* Sam Jones :
> I guess what I'm querying in a way is some of the sales blurb from
> people like PowerMTA & GreenArrow and the remarks they make about open
> source solutions like Postfix etc. This one in particular: "Open source
> Mail Transfer Agents (MTAs) often max out between 20 and 30 thousan
On Sep 3, 2012, at 03:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:14:35PM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
>
>> I guess what I'm querying in a way is some of the sales blurb from
>> people like PowerMTA & GreenArrow and the remarks they make about open
>> source solutions like Postfix etc. Thi
Hi all,
I am familiar with yahoo being difficult to send email to, as i'm sure
most all of us here are. I am now faced with needing to increase my
server's throughput to yahoo's MTA's. I was scouring the net and what
caught my attention on the postfix mailing list archives was a reply
from *V
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:14:35PM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> I guess what I'm querying in a way is some of the sales blurb from
> people like PowerMTA & GreenArrow and the remarks they make about open
> source solutions like Postfix etc. This one in particular: "Open source
> Mail Transfer Agents
Il 02/09/2012 11:43, Sam Jones ha scritto:
> More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else, I'm wondering about
> the performance that could be squeezed out of Postfix in a bulk mailing
> capacity.
>
> I have a client that currently uses and ESP who have an astounding
> throughput of up to a
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 22:46:10 +0200
Lorens Kockum wrote:
> The exact same question was sent by someone calling himself
> "Ron White" to the exim mailing list at almost exactly the same
> time. Peddling one's services by soliciting comparisons with
> competitors is so passé . . .
I find it rather u
The exact same question was sent by someone calling himself
"Ron White" to the exim mailing list at almost exactly the same
time. Peddling one's services by soliciting comparisons with
competitors is so passé . . .
Sam Jones:
> I guess what I'm querying in a way is some of the sales blurb from
> people like PowerMTA & GreenArrow and the remarks they make about open
> source solutions like Postfix etc. This one in particular: "Open source
> Mail Transfer Agents (MTAs) often max out between 20 and 30 thousand
>
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 15:39 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:43:07AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
>
> > More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else, I'm wondering about
> > the performance that could be squeezed out of Postfix in a bulk mailing
> > capacity.
>
> Runni
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 15:53:28 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/28/2012 3:38 PM, Gábor Lénárt wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:33:16PM -0400, Jon A. wrote:
> >> I'd like to immediately reject mail for all destinations with ONLY a
> >> fakemx.net record. While I could block these as I find the
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 10:43:07AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else, I'm wondering about
> the performance that could be squeezed out of Postfix in a bulk mailing
> capacity.
Running a high volume bulk email platform is not a software problem.
It is a
Am 02.09.2012 11:43, schrieb Sam Jones:
> More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else, I'm wondering about
> the performance that could be squeezed out of Postfix in a bulk mailing
> capacity.
>
> I have a client that currently uses and ESP who have an astounding
> throughput of up to a mi
More to satisfy my own curiosity than anything else, I'm wondering about
the performance that could be squeezed out of Postfix in a bulk mailing
capacity.
I have a client that currently uses and ESP who have an astounding
throughput of up to a million messages per hour. This brought up a
discussio
13 matches
Mail list logo
