Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 03:35:09PM -0600, Robert Lopez wrote: > > Please see: > > http://www.postfix.org/DATABASE_README.html#safe_db > > The question "So these errors happen while the file is being rebuilt, > right?" is a very good question but it is difficult for me to answer > with certainty.

Thank you, Wietse

2014-10-10 Thread Stephen Satchell
Sometimes we just need to say this.

Re: Compiling new postfix same as the old postfix

2014-10-10 Thread Wietse Venema
LuKreme: > I seem to have mislaid the note file in which I kept the build > options that I built postfix with, and I am planning on recompiling > a new version of postfix soon (It was supposed to be last month). > > What can I look at to figure out what the build options were for > the currently in

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-10 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 10.10.2014 um 23:35 schrieb Robert Lopez: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Please see: http://www.postfix.org/DATABASE_README.html#safe_db The question "So these errors happen while the file is being rebuilt, right?" is a very good question but it is difficult for me to

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-10 Thread Robert Lopez
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 10/10/2014 2:21 PM, Robert Lopez wrote: >> Problem: Valid email addresses being rejected. >> Problem appears to be intermittent; difficult to tell most rejections >> are legitimate. >> Not found in a hash named virtualaliases.db >> virtual_a

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/10/2014 2:21 PM, Robert Lopez wrote: > Problem: Valid email addresses being rejected. > Problem appears to be intermittent; difficult to tell most rejections > are legitimate. > Not found in a hash named virtualaliases.db > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtualaliases > When the pro

Re: Postfix 3.0

2014-10-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Stephen Satchell: > On 10/10/2014 12:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > It is, and always has been, called "release notes", and it will be > > no different than with other Postfix releases. The big-ticket items > > are detailed in INSTALL (build system) and COMPATIBILITY_README > > (managed transition

Re: valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-10 Thread motty cruz
is that a new Account maybe? have you postmap virtualaiases file? Also, I would make sure there is no miss-spelling? On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Robert Lopez wrote: > Problem: Valid email addresses being rejected. > Problem appears to be intermittent; difficult to tell most rejections > ar

valid email addresses being rejected

2014-10-10 Thread Robert Lopez
Problem: Valid email addresses being rejected. Problem appears to be intermittent; difficult to tell most rejections are legitimate. Not found in a hash named virtualaliases.db virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtualaliases When the problem has been reported the addresses are found in the f

Re: Postfix 3.0

2014-10-10 Thread Stephen Satchell
On 10/10/2014 12:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > It is, and always has been, called "release notes", and it will be > no different than with other Postfix releases. The big-ticket items > are detailed in INSTALL (build system) and COMPATIBILITY_README > (managed transition to new default settings).

Re: Postfix 3.0

2014-10-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Stephen Satchell: > On 10/10/2014 10:55 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > However with the incompatible changes in 2), I think that a major > > version number change is necessary. This may cause some delays in > > adoption, but I think it is only fair to people who have come to > > expect that upgrading

Re: Postfix 3.0

2014-10-10 Thread Stephen Satchell
On 10/10/2014 10:55 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > However with the incompatible changes in 2), I think that a major > version number change is necessary. This may cause some delays in > adoption, but I think it is only fair to people who have come to > expect that upgrading Postfix is a no-brainer, be

Postfix 3.0

2014-10-10 Thread Wietse Venema
I think it is time to consider a jump in the Postfix major version number, so that the next stable release will be Postfix 3.0 and not 2.12. 1) There are changes in the Postfix build system that are visible only to people who build Postfix from source (mainly distribution maintainers and some hard

Re: Another policy server question...

2014-10-10 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <5437738e.70...@b1-systems.de>, Lothar Gesslein wrote: >This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) >--S3jn7wKsBSncUVQTga7T8Np436be1Lonq >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On 10/09/2014 08:25 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette

Re: Postfix forwarding mail that should be handled locally

2014-10-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:46:47PM -0400, Cary Lewis wrote: > I figured it out. There are default aliases for support and sales. > > It's too bad the logs don't show what the alias engine is doing. They did, the local delivery agent reported forwarding the message and the new queue-id. Forwar

Re: Postfix forwarding mail that should be handled locally

2014-10-10 Thread Cary Lewis
I figured it out. There are default aliases for support and sales. It's too bad the logs don't show what the alias engine is doing. > On Oct 10, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Cary Lewis wrote: >> >> alias_database = hash:/etc/ali

Re: Postfix forwarding mail that should be handled locally

2014-10-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Cary Lewis wrote: > alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases > mydomain = roadpost.org > mydestination = roadpost.org, localhost, $mydomain, mail.roadpost.org, > www.$mydomain, ftp.$mydomain > myorigin = roadpost.com > > Here are some fragments from the maillo

Re: recipients attribute, policy daemon.

2014-10-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Jan P. Kessler: > > >> Or what the limitations are. > > > > Note that you can not return different results for different > > recipients at data or end_of_data stage. You can only pass or reject > > the whole mail at all. > > > > p.s. the policy server example included in the postfix docs would

Postfix forwarding mail that should be handled locally

2014-10-10 Thread Cary Lewis
I have set up postfix to receive email from one of my domain, roadpost.org I have set up two mailboxes - supp...@roadpost.org and suppo...@roadpost.org When I send email to the support2 account, postfix delivers the mail to a local mailbox as is expected. When I send email to the support account

Re: recipients attribute, policy daemon.

2014-10-10 Thread Jan P. Kessler
Or what the limitations are. Note that you can not return different results for different recipients at data or end_of_data stage. You can only pass or reject the whole mail at all. p.s. the policy server example included in the postfix docs would break. substr(0,512) is to small for a

Re: recipients attribute, policy daemon.

2014-10-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Patrik B?t: > I'm writing a incoming policy daemon and want to look where the mail > ends up, if there is more then 1 recipient I'm out to just see > rcpt_count, that will not state the destinations. Invoke the policy service in smtpd_recipient_restrictions, so that it will be invoked once per rec

Re: recipients attribute, policy daemon.

2014-10-10 Thread Jan P. Kessler
"The "recipient" attribute is available in the "RCPT TO" stage. It is also available in the "DATA" and "END-OF-MESSAGE" stages if Postfix accepted only one recipient for the current message." You can use the instance attribute to collect the list of recipients at RCPT TO stage. That informati

recipients attribute, policy daemon.

2014-10-10 Thread Patrik Båt
Hello! Is there ever going to be a recipient(s) attribute from postfix to policy daemon? "The "recipient" attribute is available in the "RCPT TO" stage. It is also available in the "DATA" and "END-OF-MESSAGE" stages if Postfix accepted only one recipient for the current message." Or might I requ

Re: Compiling new postfix same as the old postfix

2014-10-10 Thread A. Schulze
LuKreme: What can I look at to figure out what the build options were for the currently installed version so I can try to match them as closely on the new compile? search a file makedefs.out for current buildoptions information about building: http://www.postfix.org/INSTALL.html for postf