Re: Strange behavior Postfix 3.1.4 address verification

Hello. Here is the log after disabling the reject reasons: Jul 28 07:44:04 mail postfix/smtpd[12265]: connect from itexchange16.itbspa.local[192.168.116.200] Jul 28 07:44:05 mail postfix/smtpd[12265]: Anonymous TLS connection established from itexchange16.itbspa.local[192.168.116.200]: TLSv1.2

RE: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

>Did you configure your content filter to send a bounce message? Not intentionally. >Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/smtpd[11093]: 67FB13910: >client=localhost[127.0.0.1] > >Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/cleanup[11094]: 67FB13910: >message-id= > >That is

RE: List posting question

>Do you have concrete evidence that the posting actually reaches the list host, >and isn't blocked at a point closer to you? Yes, but I figured it out. It was right there in front of me in the auto-reply/bounce message. Just missed it. Apologies for the static.

Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

Did you configure your content filter to send a bounce message? Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/smtpd[11093]: 67FB13910: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/cleanup[11094]: 67FB13910: message-id= That is not a Postfix-generated

Re: List posting question

techlist06: > I'm trying to post: a question, a copy of 20 lines or so of a maillog, and > the output of postconf -n . > > The list does not seem to be accepting it. Maybe because the log has some > IP's and and address of a spammer? What should I do to sanitize it so it > will post? Not sure

Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

Postfix 3.2.2, Centos7, amavisd, clamav Upgrading my server, and recently migrated one of my older domains that gets more spam. When checking my mail queue I saw a few deferred messages to addresses that alarmed me. I had a moment of panic thinking maybe I had configured something allowing a

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 28/07/17 08:31, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Yep, I know; As I've mentioned, I prefer to build against ltb openldap, > which has proved to be well-updated and trustworthy. Ok, I prefer to stick to stock CentOS packages where I can and do so as a policy to avoid too many 3rd-party deps. > [I must

List posting question

I'm trying to post: a question, a copy of 20 lines or so of a maillog, and the output of postconf -n . The list does not seem to be accepting it. Maybe because the log has some IP's and and address of a spammer? What should I do to sanitize it so it will post? Not sure what's triggering the

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 27/7/2017 10:45 μμ, Peter wrote: You don't have to actually rebuild the src.rpms, although you certainly can if you want. There are binary rpms you can just install as per the directions at: http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfix3 Yep, I know; As I've mentioned, I prefer to build

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 28/07/17 01:51, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 27/7/2017 1:50 μμ, Peter wrote: > >>> http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Packages >> Right, that one is highly recommended, much better than attempting to >> install from source. > > OK, I followed your advice and I rebuilt the rpm(s) using: > >

Re: Strange behavior Postfix 3.1.4 address verification

> unverified_recipient_reject_reason = User unknown > unverified_sender_reject_reason = User unknown Please disable these two settings, for example: $ postconf -# unverified_recipient_reject_reason unverified_sender_reject_reason $ postfix reload and report the logs of the problem with these

Re: Change gateway on bounce

Peter, As of Postfix 2.3 you can use smtp_fallback_relay. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_fallback_relay Optional list of relay hosts for SMTP destinations that can't be found or that are unreachable. With Postfix 2.2 and earlier this parameter is called fallback_relay. --

Re: Strange behavior Postfix 3.1.4 address verification

postconf -Mf: smtp inet n - y - 1 postscreen smtpd pass - - y - - smtpd -o smtpd_proxy_filter=127.0.0.1:10024 -o smtpd_client_connection_count_limit=20 -o smtpd_proxy_options=speed_adjust dnsblogunix -

Re: Strange behavior Postfix 3.1.4 address verification

Waschl: > Hello, > > first the logs: > > Jul 27 12:52:46 mail postfix/smtpd[4341]: connect from > itexchange16.itbspa.local[192.168.116.200] > Jul 27 12:52:46 mail postfix/smtpd[4341]: Anonymous TLS connection > established from itexchange16.itbspa.local[192.168.116.200]: TLSv1.2 with > cipher

Re: Change gateway on bounce

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Peter wrote: > > I have been thinking if postfix has capability to forward a bounced email to > another server. I know I can relay emails using transport but can I relay > (retry) an email from a different server? Let's say the target

Change gateway on bounce

Hey guys, I have been thinking if postfix has capability to forward a bounced email to another server. I know I can relay emails using transport but can I relay (retry) an email from a different server? Let's say the target server says 'blacklisted' and I'd just forward that email to another

Re: Protecting mail addresses using check_sasl_access

On 26/7/2017 2:09 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote: Can you please confirm that this is a valid configuration? In the meantime I tested this configuration and it does work fine (as I expected)! Any other suggestions, pitfalls and/or comments? I surely appreciate any suggestions, pitfalls and/or

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 27/7/2017 1:50 μμ, Peter wrote: http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Packages Right, that one is highly recommended, much better than attempting to install from source. OK, I followed your advice and I rebuilt the rpm(s) using:

Strange behavior Postfix 3.1.4 address verification

Hello, first the logs: Jul 27 12:52:46 mail postfix/smtpd[4341]: connect from itexchange16.itbspa.local[192.168.116.200] Jul 27 12:52:46 mail postfix/smtpd[4341]: Anonymous TLS connection established from itexchange16.itbspa.local[192.168.116.200]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 27/7/2017 1:02 μμ, Pinter Tibor wrote: # rpm -ql postfix | grep files /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files Thank you all for your responses. Please see below: # rpm -ql postfix | grep files /usr/share/postfix/postfix-files rpm -qa postfix | grep postfix

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 27/07/17 22:44, Postfix User wrote: > You might try one of these URLs: > > http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Packages Right, that one is highly recommended, much better than attempting to install from source. Once again, though, I'd like to know where the OP got his postfix from, I get the

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:20:36 +1200, Peter stated: >On 27/07/17 21:54, Nikolaos Milas wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We are moving to a new (virtual) server (from CentOS 5 with Postfix >> 2.11.6 to CentOS 7 with Postfix 3.2.2). > >Where did you get Postfix 3.2 from? > > >Peter You might try one of

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 27/07/17 21:54, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Hello, > > We are moving to a new (virtual) server (from CentOS 5 with Postfix > 2.11.6 to CentOS 7 with Postfix 3.2.2). Where did you get Postfix 3.2 from? Peter

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

On 07/27/2017 11:59 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear Nikolaos, On 07/27/17 11:54, Nikolaos Milas wrote: We are moving to a new (virtual) server (from CentOS 5 with Postfix 2.11.6 to CentOS 7 with Postfix 3.2.2). I have moved the original configuration to the new server and Postfix won't

Re: Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

Dear Nikolaos, On 07/27/17 11:54, Nikolaos Milas wrote: We are moving to a new (virtual) server (from CentOS 5 with Postfix 2.11.6 to CentOS 7 with Postfix 3.2.2). I have moved the original configuration to the new server and Postfix won't start; I am getting: # systemctl status postfix

Migrating 2.11 to 3.2

Hello, We are moving to a new (virtual) server (from CentOS 5 with Postfix 2.11.6 to CentOS 7 with Postfix 3.2.2). I have moved the original configuration to the new server and Postfix won't start; I am getting: # systemctl status postfix postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent

Re: Use 1 TLS certificate for multiple domains

Thank you Viktor! Totally clear to me now. Greetings 2017-07-26 16:43 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni : > > > On Jul 26, 2017, at 6:01 AM, Z3us Linux wrote: > > > > I'm running Postfix with MailScanner as a spamfilter for multiple >