> On Nov 6, 2019, at 11:45 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> can other confirm it ?
>
> _ is not an ip
This could well happen, since RBL DNS servers are custom software
that does not necessarily handle empty-non-terminals.
There are more reasons to avoid qname-minimization on MTAs, I don't
Benny Pedersen skrev den 2019-11-07 05:45:
can other confirm it ?
_ is not an ip
forgot its on https://www.isc.org/blogs/qname-minimization-and-privacy/
can other confirm it ?
_ is not an ip
Richard James Salts skrev den 2019-11-07 02:03:
email address in their outgoing mail you're going to have some
collateral
damage from p=reject.
sure dmarc breaks dkim :(
On Thursday, 7 November 2019 4:23:20 AM AEDT Dominic Raferd wrote:
> ...
> The main problem with DMARC is that some mailing lists (not this one,
> I believe) mess it up, so I would suggest not to use it with
> p=quarantine or p=reject on any domain where users are likely to post
> to mailing
Roberto Carna skrev den 2019-11-06 17:11:
Is it possible to implement DKIM only in my Postfix server for all the
outgoing @example.com [1] mails ??? Or doing this I affect the
outgoing mails from my Exchange server because it sends @example.com
[1] mails withouth DKIM mechanism ???
is this
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 11:16:17AM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> On port 25 server to server connections, I agree with the sentiments of
> others on this thread and think disabling TLS1.0/1.1 is a bit premature at
> this time for most organizations.
Thanks, Victor and Blake! Your replies
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:04, Roberto Carna wrote:
> El mié., 6 nov. 2019 a las 13:48, Dominic Raferd ()
> escribió:
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:12, Roberto Carna wrote:
>> > My cooperative mail server is an Exchange which does not implement DKIM at
>> > all.
>> > But also I have a Postfix
I found that when clients are using common software like Windows 7 and
Windows Live Mail, Outlook 2013, or recent versions of Thunderbird you
are still likely to see TLS 1.0 connections. If your mail server only
serves an organization where you control the client software you could
probably
Dear Dominic, thanks for your interesting comments.
I administrate the Postfix mail server, not the Exchange, so I can't do
anything to implement DKIM in the second one.
In my Postfix mail server I've just have SPF implemented for outgoing
mails.Maybe it's better to add DKIM + DMARC in place
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:12, Roberto Carna wrote:
> My cooperative mail server is an Exchange which does not implement DKIM at
> all.
> But also I have a Postfix mail relay for the "example.com" domain.
> Is it possible to implement DKIM only in my Postfix server for all the
> outgoing
> On Nov 6, 2019, at 10:17 AM, Bastian Blank
> wrote:
>
>> Now, I know that what is good for web servers/browsers, isn't
>> necessarily the same for SMTP servers. For example, I've learned from
>> this mailing list that public facing MTAs should not require
>> super-strong ciphers because that
Dear, my domain is "example.com".
My cooperative mail server is an Exchange which does not implement DKIM at
all.
But also I have a Postfix mail relay for the "example.com" domain.
Is it possible to implement DKIM only in my Postfix server for all the
outgoing @example.com mails ??? Or doing
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0600, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla have all announced that they will
> be deprecating TLS 1.0 and 1.1 in March 2020, in their web browsers.
Mail is not a web browser.
> Similarly, SSL Labs has announced that they will be
Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla have all announced that they will
be deprecating TLS 1.0 and 1.1 in March 2020, in their web browsers.
Similarly, SSL Labs has announced that they will be downgrading web
server scores to a maximum of B, starting in January 2020, if that
webserver supports TLS
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2019-11-06 10:26:
this looks like a job for spam filter, not opendmarc.
opendmarc is not spam, its forged protection
i have posted how to avoid dmarc reject on maillist
Chi Min Wang skrev den 2019-11-06 03:30:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
why have you configured opendmarc to put anything on hold based on
dmarc when you now ask how to do something with it ?
The OpenDMARC just informs Postfix to put the suspicious mail into its
HOLD queue(Postfix's quarantine)
Benny Pedersen wrote:
why have you configured opendmarc to put anything on hold based on dmarc
when you now ask how to do something with it ?
On 06.11.19 10:30, Chi Min Wang wrote:
The OpenDMARC just informs Postfix to put the suspicious mail into its
HOLD queue(Postfix's
18 matches
Mail list logo
