On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:56:17PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:33:46AM -0800, Jon Leech wrote:
>
> > The only meaningful messages in the mail logs were
> >
> > Dec 10 00:01:58 celly postfix/smtp[21050]: warning: relayhost configuration
> > problem
> > Dec 10
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:33:46AM -0800, Jon Leech wrote:
> The only meaningful messages in the mail logs were
>
> Dec 10 00:01:58 celly postfix/smtp[21050]: warning: relayhost configuration
> problem
> Dec 10 00:01:58 celly postfix/smtp[21050]: send attr reason = unable to look
> up host
On 12/10/20 6:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Str?der:
>> Is it possible to compile postfix without support for tables based on
>> Berkeley's libdb statically linked in? Just like building lmdb support
>> into shared lib
>> /usr/lib/postfix/postfix-lmdb.so.
>
> To enable/disable build
100% agree that PF mailer is not the best place to discuss this so
absent any other suggestion, does Reddit make sense? Please let me know
if anyone has picked up this discussion somewhere else…
Thanks…
- - -
On 9 Dec 2020, at 9:35, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
I don't think this is the right
Michael Str?der:
> HI!
>
> Is it possible to compile postfix without support for tables based on
> Berkeley's libdb statically linked in? Just like building lmdb support
> into shared lib
> /usr/lib/postfix/postfix-lmdb.so.
To enable/disable build options:
$ make makefiles CCARGS="-DNO_DB"
HI!
Is it possible to compile postfix without support for tables based on
Berkeley's libdb statically linked in? Just like building lmdb support
into shared lib
/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-lmdb.so.
I read through README_FILES/DB_README but did not find advice similar to
that using AUXLIBS_LMDB (as
DNS lookups are done by SYSTEM LIBRARY functions, and these log
nothing no matter how you twiddle Postfix options. Postfix is the
messenger of bad news; don't blame the messenger.
Consider using strace (see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html)
and find out what if you have a 'missing file'
On 10 Dec 2020, at 6:48, @lbutlr wrote:
On 10 Dec 2020, at 03:58, Vincent Pelletier
wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure what the "silent drop" is about...
Some recipient server is setup to pretend-accept your emails when you
are listed on that DNSBL ?
Some setups do this. Certainly before psotscreen
I'm using postfix 3.4.14-0+deb10u1 as the MTA on my Debian machine,
with
disable_dns_lookups = yes
relayhost [mail.sonic.net]:587
This has worked fine for many years until on 12/3, without any
changes in my local OS / postfix configuration, it started failing to
deliver mail to the
On 10 Dec 2020, at 03:58, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:38:30 +1300, David Neil wrote:
>> Evidently we share frustration.
>
> This is an understatement :) .
> Just seeing the subject of your original email made my blood pressure
> go all over the place.
One of the early
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:38:30 +1300, David Neil wrote:
> Evidently we share frustration.
This is an understatement :) .
Just seeing the subject of your original email made my blood pressure
go all over the place.
> The 'silent drop' bothers me - the message author went to some trouble
> to
11 matches
Mail list logo
