Dominik George:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
>
> [ please excuse me if this kind of progress reports for learning ]
> [ and feedback are discouraged on this list ]
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:31:00AM +, Claus
Matt Saladna:
> Hello,
>
> When specifying a range of responses to ignore in postscreen_dnsbl_sites
> it appears that if a weight is zero it is ignored in favor of a non-zero
> weight.
Coming back to this thread, please ignore my previuous responses
about order dependence. They were wrong.
After some delay, I have verified that postscreen_dnsbl_sites works
as promised: it adds up the scores from all matching patterns.
This verification required some infrastructure to test postscreen's
scoring code outside of postscreen. I have written a half-dozen
tests to ensure that future
Hi,
[ please excuse me if this kind of progress reports for learning ]
[ and feedback are discouraged on this list ]
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:31:00AM +, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022, Dominik George wrote:
>
> > only that these have a very limited set of
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:01:52AM +0200, witcher wrote:
> >As to popularity, I use "mutt", which already supports setting the
> >envelope sender based on the "From:" header, passing the desired
> >envelope sender to sendmail(1).
>
> Huh, I didn't know it does that.
>From my .muttrc file:
lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> Hi.
>
> Maybe a simple thing but my head is running in circles.
>
> I'm integrating rspamd as milter like this:
> smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:11332
>
> MILTER_README says that one should use disable_mime_output_conversion=yes for
> milters and shows an example (in
On 11/08/2022 14:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2022-08-11 at 07:56:41 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:56:41 +0100)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
I can't use reject_unknown_client_hostname as I know at least one
major ISP in the UK has their mailserver announcing a ???.local
Hi.
Maybe a simple thing but my head is running in circles.
I'm integrating rspamd as milter like this:
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:11332
MILTER_README says that one should use disable_mime_output_conversion=yes for
milters and shows an example (in Workarounds):
scan unix -
On 2022-08-11 at 07:56:41 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:56:41 +0100)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
I can't use reject_unknown_client_hostname as I know at least one
major ISP in the UK has their mailserver announcing a ???.local or
???.lan domain.
On 11.08.22 09:23, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2022-08-11 at 07:56:41 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:56:41 +0100)
Nick Howitt
is rumored to have said:
I can't use reject_unknown_client_hostname as I know at least one
major ISP in the UK has their mailserver announcing a ???.local or
???.lan domain.
1. Ewww. That's so '90s.
2. The
On 11.08.22 11:43, Nick Howitt wrote:
[root@server ~]# postconf -n | grep restrictions
Sometimes I see things like:
Aug 11 05:29:50 server postfix/smtpd[22642]: connect from
unknown[103.169.188.140]
Aug 9 15:53:47 server postfix/smtpd[16934]: connect from
unknown[162.240.216.231]
On
Dnia 11.08.2022 o godz. 12:56:41 Nick Howitt pisze:
>
> Oh OK, so when it says "unknown" it only means that forward and reverse DNS
> don't match? I was reading it that the reverse DNS didn't exits.
>
> I can't use reject_unknown_client_hostname as I know at least one major ISP
> in the UK has
On 11/08/2022 11:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.08.22 11:43, Nick Howitt wrote:
[root@server ~]# postconf -n | grep restrictions
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
On 11.08.22 11:43, Nick Howitt wrote:
[root@server ~]# postconf -n | grep restrictions
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_non_fqdn_hostname,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022, Dominik George wrote:
> only that these have a very limited set of tables available, and
Have you taken a look at socketmap_table(5)?
Maybe that can be used to solve your problem.
On 11.08.22 11:36, Dominik George wrote:
I am currently integrating Postfix tightly into a web-based
system. The objective is to do as much communication between a cloud
platform and the systems using it using pure HTTP / REST APIs.
The platform provides a REST API that takes an e-mail address
There isn't.
Good to know.
As to popularity, I use "mutt", which already supports setting the
envelope sender based on the "From:" header, passing the desired
envelope sender to sendmail(1).
Huh, I didn't know it does that. I've only tried sending with
sendmail(1) via the command line
17 matches
Mail list logo
