On 19.08.22 09:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps allows specifying transport,
with some limits
I see! It *seems* to use the correct transport for the server now, but
now I'm getting another error:
```
Aug 19 23:02:43 portable-navi postfix/smtp[385223]:
On 19.08.22 02:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
you can define multiple transports in master.cf and use them if you
need different client settings.
That's interesting, thank you for the tip and example configuration!
so you can use transport like "smtpssl:" in your *relayhost_maps:
smtpssl
On 19.08.22 02:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
you can define multiple transports in master.cf and use them if you
need different client settings.
That's interesting, thank you for the tip and example configuration!
so you can use transport like "smtpssl:" in your *relayhost_maps:
smtpssl
On 19.08.22 10:47, Sam R wrote:
So I am a little divided,
On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit mails locally,
I guess by "locally" you mean "on the local network".
port 25 is standard for server-server communication, 465/587 are standard
for client-server communication
On 8/19/22 07:08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 19.08.22 10:47, Sam R wrote:
>> So I am a little divided,
>> On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit mails locally,
>
> I guess by "locally" you mean "on the local network".
>
> port 25 is standard for server-server
Understood, I adopt the communication in starttls port 25 between my
servers.
Thanks again to all.
Samuel
Le ven. 19 août 2022 à 13:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a
écrit :
> On 19.08.22 10:47, Sam R wrote:
> > So I am a little divided,
> >On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit
On 19.08.22 13:27, witcher wrote:
I've set up Postfix for use as a relayhost, using multiple SMTP servers
via `sender_dependent_relayhost_maps`.
The issue I have is that one needs to use the settings
`smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt` and `smtp_tls_wrappermode = yes`,
while another one needs
Hello,
I've set up Postfix for use as a relayhost, using multiple SMTP servers
via `sender_dependent_relayhost_maps`.
The issue I have is that one needs to use the settings
`smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt` and `smtp_tls_wrappermode = yes`,
while another one needs `smtp_tls_security_level =
On 19.08.22 10:47, Sam R wrote:
So I am a little divided,
On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit mails locally,
I guess by "locally" you mean "on the local network".
port 25 is standard for server-server communication, 465/587 are standard
for client-server communication
Hello all,
Just Stumbled upon a mail from Wietse Venema Nov 14, 2014, 8:41:10 PM
to Matthias Schneider:
Quote "
> Hello,
>
> I had a very high I/O load on process tlsmgr because the smtp_scache and
> smtpd_scache files are written to often (smtp_scache.db ~70mb) .
>
> data_directory =
Dnia 19.08.2022 o godz. 10:47:25 Sam R pisze:
> So I am a little divided,
> On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit mails locally,
> on the other hand I think that an encryption would be better, especially on
> the dmz.
Mail transmission on port 25 usually uses encryption (via
So I am a little divided,
On the one hand I think that port 25 is enough to transmit mails locally,
on the other hand I think that an encryption would be better, especially on
the dmz.
Also, I have 20 servers that send logwatch locally and I don't see myself
creating a tunnel for each of them.
On 2022-08-16 13:17, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jonathan S?lea:
>
> All recipients[1], or only "valid" recipients[2]??
>
> [1] Makes sense if the mail is NOT delivered. Examples of that are
> spamtraps or honeypots.
Yes, that is the case here - honeypots/spamtraps.
Postfix can do that (bit see
13 matches
Mail list logo
