[pfx] temporary lookup error with utf8mb4 characters

2023-04-16 Thread Víctor Rubiella Monfort via Postfix-users
Hi, I have more info and I try to explain it better: First of all I have smtputf8_enable = no (disabled). I have several databases related with several mysql_virtual maps: - Some with utf8 + utf8_general_ci collation - Another ones with latin1 + latin1_spanish_ci. I'm using mysql-postfix

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users : > > Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users: >> Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: >>> >>> Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route >>> via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users: > Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: > > > > Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route > > via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most > > likely because the spam

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread John Levine via Postfix-users
It appears that Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users said: >Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: >> >> Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route >> via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most >> likely

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze: > > Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route > via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most > likely because the spam probability is higher in this context. This

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Oleksandr via Postfix-users
Dear Viktor, I'm is an old grandfather, and I'm already not thinking straight in Linux and I'm confused about these adjustments. But I very need to get this stubborn and also old Videocam to work :-) You have already helped me a lot in solving this problem, for which I thank you very much! If

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:05:02PM +0300, Oleksandr wrote: > > You now need to again post your configuration settings. Post the output > > of: > > ># postconf -nf smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file smtpd_tls_chain_files ># ls -l $(postconf -xh smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Oleksandr via Postfix-users
> You now need to again post your configuration settings. Post the output > of: > # postconf -nf smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file smtpd_tls_chain_files # ls -l $(postconf -xh smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file smtpd_tls_chain_files) # grep -E '^-(BEGIN|END) ' $(postconf

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 09:24:09PM +0300, Oleksandr wrote: > I think I've followed all your instructions, and now I've got another > mistake: That means that either my instructions had a typo, or your implementation of correct instructions had a typo. > Apr 16 21:20:29 mailserver

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Oleksandr via Postfix-users
I think I've followed all your instructions, and now I've got another mistake: Apr 16 21:20:29 mailserver postfix/smtps/smtpd[2496]: warning: No server certs available. TLS won't be enabled Apr 16 21:20:30 mailserver postfix/smtps/smtpd[2496]: connect from unknown[192.168.8.144] Apr 16 21:20:30

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:49:00PM +0300, Oleksandr wrote: > > Did you reconfigure Postfix to use the generated PEM file > > as your certificate and private key file? > > I didn't know it had to be done... I just do what you recommend. How > do I need to do this reconfiguration? Please tell

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Oleksandr via Postfix-users
> Did you reconfigure Postfix to use the generated PEM file > as your certificate and private key file? I didn't know it had to be done... I just do what you recommend. How do I need to do this reconfiguration? Please tell me about this in more detail. And another question: do these commands

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 06:03:09PM +0300, Oleksandr via Postfix-users wrote: > Okay, Viktor! I executed these commands and got this result: > > $ dnsname=mailserver.mail.lan > $ rm certkey.pem > rm: Unable to delete 'certkey.pem': No such file or directory > user@mailserver:~$ openssl req -new

[pfx] Re: Postfix refuses to accept email from video camera

2023-04-16 Thread Oleksandr via Postfix-users
Okay, Viktor! I executed these commands and got this result: $ dnsname=mailserver.mail.lan $ rm certkey.pem rm: Unable to delete 'certkey.pem': No such file or directory user@mailserver:~$ openssl req -new -nodes -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout /dev/stdout \ -config <(printf

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> John Levine via Postfix-users : > [...] > If you are a customer, what happened when you contacted them through > their customer support channels and asekd for the support you are > paying for? Web.de is a german freemail provider like gmail. They might provide support for paid accounts only.

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> one of web.de's sender IPs is listed into zen.spamhaus.org as the following > info. > > 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.165.159.35] blocked using z > en.spamhaus.org; https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL175032 Try to send your email via web.de (browser), which might use

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread John Levine via Postfix-users
It appears that tom--- via Postfix-users said: >$ dig -x 82.165.159.35 +short >mout-xforward.web.de. > >Can anyone from web.de help with this? The only people who should be able to send mail through that server are web.de customers. If you are a customer, what happened when you contacted them

[pfx] Re: any web.de staff here?

2023-04-16 Thread Jan Ceuleers via Postfix-users
On 16/04/2023 05:57, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote: > Intentionally at the request of web.de it seems.  Did you read: >> >>     https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL175032 >> >> If your message was blocked, and was not spam, contact: >> >>     https://postmaster.web.de/en/case?c=uar > > I sent