On 2023-04-28 10:21, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 08:32:29AM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users
wrote:
I have a local real mailbox: u...@foo.com. When I setup this alias
map in virtual_alias_maps file:
u...@foo.com u...@gmail.com
(then postmap this fil
Tom Reed via Postfix-users writes:
> (...)
> How can I setup it to both reach local mailbox and forwarding?
>
You first have to read 3 times very carefully:
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/175365?sjid=13805511033984428370-AP
I read all emails at Gmail. Yes i'm forwarding user like you.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 08:32:29AM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
> I have a local real mailbox: u...@foo.com. When I setup this alias
> map in virtual_alias_maps file:
>
> u...@foo.com u...@gmail.com
>
> (then postmap this file). The message sent to u...@foo.com won't
> reach in
Hello list,
I have a local real mailbox: u...@foo.com
When I setup this alias map in virtual_alias_maps file:
u...@foo.com u...@gmail.com
(then postmap this file).
The message sent to u...@foo.com won't reach into mailbox, but just
forwarded to gmail.
How can I setup it to both reach local m
Eray Aslan via Postfix-users:
> Some links seem to be broken in postfix.org downloads page
> http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html. Example:
> http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-3.9-20230419.tar.gz
>
> I also do not see a link to postfix-3.7
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:13:13AM -0300, Rejaine Monteiro via
Postfix-users wrote:
> And is there any way to not send bounces to a specific email (ex:
> don't send bounces to nore...@domain.com)
Em qui., 27 de abr. de 2023 às 11:57, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:15:38PM -0300, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
> I know that bounces are necessary..
> but addresses like "noreply" are usually automation robots and do not
> receive responses and can generate double bounces..
Responses may not be read (or, in particular, *replied-to*), but bo
I know that bounces are necessary..
but addresses like "noreply" are usually automation robots and do not
receive responses and can generate double bounces..
Not be fixed (not an error), I just want to know if there is a way to avoid
bounces to specific addresses (like nore...@somedomain.com)
.. s
On 4/27/23 04:47, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Ken Peng via Postfix-users:
Using rspamd instead of postscreen?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.
If you suggest relying on rspamd only, and forgo postscreen, I have to
disagree. In my experience, postscreen has proven highl
Some links seem to be broken in postfix.org downloads page
http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html. Example:
http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-3.9-20230419.tar.gz
I also do not see a link to postfix-3.7.5, 3.6.9 etc
--
Eray
* Sebastian Wiesinger [2023-04-27 17:59]:
> root@alita:/etc/postfix# postmap -q - regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks.pcre
> Message-ID:
> reject SPAM backscatter with forged domain name in Message-ID header
And of course I ran into my own filter when I got the mail back from
the mailingli
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure if I'm missing something but I can't find out why my
body_checks doesn't catch all the backscatter I'm getting right now.
I've it configured like this:
root@alita:/etc/postfix# postconf -n body_checks
body_checks = pcre:$config_directory/body_checks.pcre
root@alita:/e
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:13:13AM -0300, Rejaine Monteiro via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I have a Postfix 3.4.13 that sends non-delivery notifications with a blank
> "from" address, like so:
>
> postfix/bounce[3337994]: 536301634D8: sender non-delivery notification:
> 421CF1634EB
> postfix/qmgr[22
Hi
I have a Postfix 3.4.13 that sends non-delivery notifications with a blank
"from" address, like so:
postfix/bounce[3337994]: 536301634D8: sender non-delivery notification:
421CF1634EB
postfix/qmgr[2272522]: 421CF1634EB: from=<>, size=8212, nrcpt=1 (queue
active)
How can I fix this?
And is th
Do you know any plugins for scoring a domain?
For example, new registered domain, free domain get the low scores.
Thanks.
--
https://kenpeng.pages.dev/
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-u
On 26.04.23 19:40, Ken Peng via Postfix-users wrote:
Using rspamd instead of postscreen?
no, using spamassassin or rspamd in addition to postscreen.
postscreen is great for eliminating bots, which is something other spam
filters only hardly detect.
It's also can machines listed in multiple
Hi
In old version 3.4.x problem not exists
W dniu 27.04.2023 o 14:50, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
SATOH Fumiyasu (TSUCHIDA Fumiyasu) via Postfix-users:
I see the following problems.
1. `postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix ...'` will duplicates entries
in master.cf.
Nice find: postconf s
SATOH Fumiyasu (TSUCHIDA Fumiyasu) via Postfix-users:
> I see the following problems.
>
> 1. `postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix ...'` will duplicates entries
> in master.cf.
Nice find: postconf should reject this request, because the key
(bar/unix) does not match the content (foo unix ...).
> 2. `p
Hi
In centos7
root@node2-klone:~# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 3.4.23
root@node2-klone:~# postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix - n n - - pipe
argv=/bin/false'
root@node2-klone:~# postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix - n n - - pipe
argv=/bin/false'
root@node2-klone:~# postconf -M bar/unix='foo unix
* Ken Peng via Postfix-users:
> Using rspamd instead of postscreen?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.
If you suggest relying on rspamd only, and forgo postscreen, I have to
disagree. In my experience, postscreen has proven highly useful in spam
prevention, in particular when DNSBL lookup
20 matches
Mail list logo
