On 4/27/23 04:47, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Ken Peng via Postfix-users:
Using rspamd instead of postscreen?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.
If you suggest relying on rspamd only, and forgo postscreen, I have to
disagree. In my experience, postscreen has proven highly useful in spam
prevention, in particular when DNSBL lookups are configured in addition
to the standard tests. The latter already catch many spammers in a
hurry, though.
Postscreen is good for rejecting the low-hanging fruit in fast
before-accept checks. It's not so good at deep inspection. If you want
deep inspection, do it after acceptance using a more suitable tool ...
such as rspamd. Don't try to do it in postscreen. That's not its
intended purpose.
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.ordinate.org
Landline: +1.603.293.8485
Mobile: +1.603.998.6958
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
