Re: error with a single user

matches virtual_mailbox_recipients:kathy.lamp...@domain.com.au kathy Binary file virtual_mailbox_recipients.db matches The user should have either a local or a virtual mailbox. Not both at the same time. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save

Re: Drop the rejects from a forwarded alias

practices way given I have to do forward this email and am powerless to change the design other than our setup which may only include trying to mitigate backskatter? Then you cannot avoid being a backscatter source or a mail blackhole or both. Plain and simple. Regards Ansgar Wiechers

Re: Tons of Delivery Status Notifications from random places.

On 2010-11-25 Patric Falinder wrote: Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-24 18:11: On 2010-11-24 Patric Falinder wrote: lst_ho...@kwsoft.de skrev 2010-11-24 11:08: Be sure to limit the usage of the list to the affected account and maybe even to bounce sender addresses as a lot of legitim hosts

Re: Tons of Delivery Status Notifications from random places.

On 2010-11-25 Patric Falinder wrote: Ansgar Wiechers skrev 2010-11-25 09:44: You could try something like this: # /etc/postfix/main.cf ... smtpd_restriction_classes = backscatter_rbl backscatter_rbl = reject_rbl_client ips.backscatterer.org smtpd_recipient_restrictions

Re: Tons of Delivery Status Notifications from random places.

On 2010-11-25 Noel Jones wrote: On 11/25/2010 2:44 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: However, you can't use reject_rbl_client in these tables (see man 5 access). Yes, you can use reject_rbl_client (or any other built-in restriction) as a result of a table lookup. Restriction classes are only

Re: Tons of Delivery Status Notifications from random places.

Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: How Do I Reject Spam To 'mail' user?

local_recipient_maps = $alias_maps to prevent any local account not listed in $alias_maps from receiving mail. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: i get User unknown for legit users

On 2010-11-17 Jay G. Scott wrote: now -- my relay_recipient_maps parameter points to pfknown_users which has the form: ttt OK do i have to have ...@arlut.utexas.edu OK ? Yes. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel

Re: main.cf sanity check request

? Please elaborate. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Problem telnet postfix from a network segment not local

. tcptraceroute may help narrowing down that something. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Want description

hits=1 miss=10 success=9% Aug 27 04:23:21 dell860-504 postfix/scache[20225]: statistics: max simultaneous domains=1 addresses=1 connection=10 http://www.postfix.org/CONNECTION_CACHE_README.html Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning

Re: Rewriting Date header for local senders, or something like that.

to a doc where this is explained, that will be enough for me. What do you think on this? Fix the problem rather than the symptom. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: specify local and non local destination

you want the roaming user's mail to go, and where are they supposed to be able to send from? Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available. --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq

Re: newbie question: rbl checking

as the originating IP is listed at njabl.org AFAICS your approach is likely to generate backscatter and perhaps even violations of your clients's contracts. Don't do that. RBL filtering in your scenario should be done either at your clients' mail servers or not at all. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- All

Re: What is the proper way to deal with non-existing e-mail addresses?

after accepting them, and to make sure the latter does not happen much. What about backscatter? Doesn't bouncing generate a lot of backscatter? Bouncing does. Rejecting doesn't. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Is such an SSL attack possible against Postfix?

on the server without having to saturate the bandwidth, due to cryptographic operations required by SSL. And that it seems to use BitTorrent as a multiplicator, so it doesn't require a botnet. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel

Re: OT: ISP Blocking of port 25

thing about the violation. Sorry to burst your bubble. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: OT: ISP Blocking of port 25

is found to be doing something illegal. If you actually believe that, I suggest you move to China or someplace. Now. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Negation in header_checks doesn't work as expected?

probably because there are a *lot* headers in any given mail that don't match this pattern. ;) Try something like this: if /^To: @example\.com$/ !/^To: (.*)-keyword@(.*)$/ REJECT endif Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning

Re: email account bombarded with SPAM error bounces - what to do?

the proxy filter I wrote a while ago to take care of this problem. http://www.planetcobalt.net/sdb/backscatter.shtml WFM, but beware that it's not tested on (and probably not suitable for) high-volume servers. /shameless-plug Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working

Re: client certificate?

think I need to do something with client certificates? No. You need a server certificate, enable submission (port 587/tcp, SASL authentication), and point your clients to that port. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Multiple Users

On 2010-06-30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: Does postfix support multiple users using aliases? Yes. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: set a catch-all for users that not exists in database

...@domain.tld @domain.tld noexist...@domain.tld is there is way to do this ? The above should do what you want, provided that noexistant is an existing mailbox. If it doesn't work: please supply the output of postconf -n and a log excerpt demonstrating the problem. Regards Ansgar Wiechers

Re: set a catch-all for users that not exists in database

On 2010-06-30 Charles Marcus wrote: On 2010-06-30 10:00 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2010-06-30 David Touzeau wrote: I would like to redirect messages that recipient are not listed in aliases to a single mailbox have set virtual_alias_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/virtual use...@domain.tld

Re: smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient

On 2010-06-10 Jerrale Gayle wrote: On 6/10/2010 6:31 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Jerrale Gayle wrote: I want to accept all mail to non-existent users, then bounce, so that people can't probe for valid users to know wherer to start a brute force. This is a horrible

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

local_recipient_maps = $alias_maps and add explicit mappings for those local users that should be able to receive mail. Otherwise your Postfix will accept mail for any local user account on the system. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 2010-05-26 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Shouldn'T you use at least ONE RBL? Probably wouldn't hurt, but unless he's trying to fight off spam sent to valid users (which according to his description doesn't seem to be the case) he could go without as well. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 2010-05-26 brian wrote: On 10-05-26 03:21 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: The connections are being rejected, so unless your server resources are being exhausted by the delivery attempts I don't think you have to worry about it. As mentioned in another msg, I neglected to mention that postfix

Re: I've inherited a botnet target

On 2010-05-26 brian wrote: On 10-05-26 03:24 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2010-05-26 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Shouldn'T you use at least ONE RBL? Probably wouldn't hurt, but unless he's trying to fight off spam sent to valid users (which according to his description doesn't seem

Re: Spampd proxy bypassed by some mails

/body_checks: /^http:\/\/.+\..+\/\?email=jan\.muenn...@dotplex\.de/ REJECT Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: wildcard domains

in my sender checks. I think there was (is?) a need for the double entry (one with '.') That's controlled by presence/absence of the string smtpd_access_maps in $parent_domain_matches_subdomains. See man 5 access. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save

Re: Modifying body content before delivering

mailtextbody - it does just that: strips off all non-text parts and leaves a clean, text-only message. Sounds interesting, but how does it handle html-only mails (i.e. mails with no text/plain MIME part) or mails that are declared text/plain, but contain HTML nonetheless? Regards Ansgar Wiechers

Re: Postfix, SASL sending mail through Postfix.

]. Debugging comes as a second step when he encounters problems while following the documentation. [1] http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Postfix, SASL sending mail through Postfix.

the procedure described here: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: two domains on one server

nothing to do with your Postfix. It may be related to your DNS setup, though. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Stopping spammers extreme

) addresses to gmail mailboxes. And we still don't know how the supposed spams are entering Postfix in the first place. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Stopping spammers extreme

not supposed to listen on: configure the services to not listen on those interfaces. Do NOT let the services listen on all interfaces and then block access with a packet filter. inet_interfaces = loopback-only Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time

Re: Stopping spammers extreme

of postconf -n. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: regular expression in header_check question

...@bu.edu here is what i want to use , is this the correct syntax or do I need to double quote those quotes somehow. /^From: Viagra US supplier/ DISCARD viagra foo /^From: Viagra US dealer/ DISCARD viagra foo /^From: .*viagra/ DISCARD viagra foo Regards Ansgar Wiechers

Re: Postfix inbound message configuration

a catch-all mailbox on the Postfix host. Use procmail to store all mail to that mailbox in Maildir format. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Out of Office auto reply setting

on mailclient? Thanks but this does not work In case you actually want someone to assist you in solving your problem, you may want to elaborate on how exactly this does not work for you (i.e. provide error messages, log excerpts, etc.). You may also want to refrain from top-posting. Regards Ansgar

Re: Allow specific IP to send mail without username/password

logging in. I suppose you're talking about relaying through your MTA. mynetworks = ..., a.b.c.d/32 You need to permit_mynetworks in smtpd_*_restrictions (this is the default). Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: mailbox_command

: Danny does not inspire much confidence in the aviation industry. A bit of unsolicited personal advice to him: tone down the bragging. http://slash7.com/2006/12/22/vampires/ Reply-To set to myself, as this is getting off-topic. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working

Re: Postfix sending NDR instead of rejecting in SMTP session

On 2010-04-22 Vegard Svanberg wrote: * Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net [2010-04-21 13:11]: Example 2: u...@example.invalid is forwarded to r...@example2.invalid. r...@example2.invalid does not exist; neither as an alias nor a mailbox. SMTP dialog: rcpt to: u...@example.invalid

Re: Postfix sending NDR instead of rejecting in SMTP session

MTA does not have invalid mappings. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: how to restrict mail to only one recipient?

*_restrictions don't apply to pickup. How can I restrict my server to send mail TO u...@domain? # /etc/postfix/main.cf transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport # /etc/postfix/transport u...@domain : * error:destination prohibited Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time

Re: block specific IP addresses

On 2010-04-15 groups wrote: Syntax follow up question... 1.2.3.4 tab REJECT or 1.2.3.4 tabtab REJECT 1.2.3.4 any_amount_of_whitespace REJECT Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Trouble with virtual_alias_maps and mailman stopped working

domain? Also post the output of postconf -n rather than your main.cf. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Another option [for defragmentation] is to back up your important files, erase the hard disk, then reinstall Mac OS X and your backed up files. --http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25668

Re: RBL Usage questions

, it doesn't influence it as much as if many of them do. That works for small sites who can afford to content filter all mail. For other sites, this is no more an option. policyd-weight does the same without content filtering. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working

Re: Configuration Backup Script

of a running database. Also I'd suggest to use rsync -a instead of cp -Rp for performing file backups. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Configuration Backup Script

, not for SuSE Linux. IIRC it's a Python script, so it should be possible to modify it to be usable on Linux as well. However, right now mailbfr is distributed as a .pkg, so one would have to go to some lengths to even extract the actual script from the package. Regards Ansgar Wiechers

Re: Mailgateway

that will generate a list of valid recipients from various (file-based) recipient and domain lists. If I manage to unearth it after I get home tonight, I'll post it here. [1] http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relay_recipient_maps Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't

Re: Mailgateway

On 2010-04-08 Thomas wrote: Ansgar Wiechers schrieb: Where /etc/postfix/mydomains lists all domains to be relayed You may want to use a more speaking name for your relay domains (like, /etc/postfix/relay_domains ;). I need a file with the same content on Server B, where it is referred

Re: pop-before-smtp should not put localhost/server ip in the list then?

some broken mail client that handles neither In-Reply-To nor References header, could you *at least* leave the subject alone? So that non-broken mail clients have a chance to associate your responses with the respective thread? Thank you. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working

Re: Pop-Before-Smtp let spam through Answered More on Firewall with postfix?

with the -v and it seems to be not completed or done wrong. So I tried to post the section that fitted my question. Perhaps you should try posting what fits *our* questions. That would save yourself and us a lot of time. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us

Re: All email forward a copy to testing server

into this: /^(.*)@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.domain.com I had considered it quite clear that an if-condition without the if-keyword wouldn't make any sense. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Postfix redirection after aliase resolution

On 2010-03-26 Bob Sauvage wrote: I have a postfix server and I want to redirect my mails to another server (Spam filter) after the aliase resolution. Because this spam filter can only filter 100 adresses. When the other server has completed its work, it sends this mail to my Postfix server

Re: Spam from the same domain

sending mail over your infrastructure? Do you force them to use SMTP AUTH/SASL? If so then you might have a look at reject_sender_login_mismatch to stop forgeries from your own domain. The OP wants to block external, not internal senders. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time

Re: Directing SPAM mail to a Junk Folder

folder is inside the Maildir as .Junk. Amavisd-new tags the spam mails as [SPAM] Configure either the MDA or the user's MUA to put tagged mail into the Junk folder. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: update: Small amount of spam still routed through server and another problem with spam

, reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net, reject_rbl_client combined.rbl.msrbl.net, reject_rbl_client rabl.nuclearelephant.com smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining, reject_multi_recipient_bounce, permit Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't

Re: All email forward a copy to testing server

should be sufficient. I get this error: warning: regexp map /etc/postfix/recipient_bcc, line 2: out of range replacement index 1: skipping this rule What did I do wrong? You didn't group what the $1 is supposed to refer to. /^(.*)@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.domain.com Regards Ansgar

Re: Small amount of spam still routed through server and another problem with spam

in. Put what rules back where? (below is my postfix config file)(kinda messed up abit because of what I used to copy it) Please post the output of postconf -n instead of the contents of main.cf, so we can see the actual configuration your Postfix is using. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions

Re: Small amount of spam still routed through server and anotherproblem with spam

or a proxy filter. I seem to recall a discussion about this very topic not too long ago, but was unable to find it when sifting through the list archive. [1] http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote: Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the @ as a key to see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing. That's what address extension was invented for. See the respective section of man 8 local. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time

Re: MDN and mupliple recipients

has nothing to do with this aside from being the messenger. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Two virtual domains

. Is this a serious problem? Yes. How to resolve it? Make the virtual aliases explicit. 8 us...@domain2 us...@domain1 us...@domain2 us...@domain1 us...@domain1 us...@domain2 us...@domain1 us...@domain2 8 And make sure the mailboxes do exist. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us

Re: Two virtual domains

On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote: 2010/3/16 Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote: I set up two domain aliases: @domain1 @domain2 and @domain2 @domain1 This makes you a backscatterer, because Postfix will accept all mail for both domain1 and domain2

Re: Sender and recipient dependant header checks

on the presence of some header for the decision whether or not to spam-check an incoming mail. For relaying of outbound mail you could enable submission on the backend MTA. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Problem with Postfix/Cyrus-imap setup

$virtual_alias_maps for virtual mailboxes. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: postfix as dispatcher

similar to relay that allow to specify a list of mail server addresses and not only one Use DNS. Seriously. And please keep your mails on-list, so others can benefit from the discussion as well. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On 2010-03-03 Stan Hoeppner wrote: Ansgar Wiechers put forth on 3/3/2010 9:01 AM: I was under the impression that his Postfix and Dovecot are running on the same (remote) host, and he's using Postfix as a smarthost for his outbound mail. If that's the case, then there certainly

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On 2010-03-04 Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2010-03-03 Stan Hoeppner wrote: I suppose it might be possible to hack together a solution in the MTA or IMAP server, manually dropping copies of sent messages in the user's IMAP Sent Items folder. That would be one heck of a kludge though

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On 2010-03-04 Charles Marcus wrote: On 2010-03-03 4:49 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: Read again. The sent items folder is in the user's mailbox, which Thunderbird most certainly does *not* access via SMTP, but via IMAP. My point was, if you want this to be done *without* TB having to save

Re: Saving to Sent folder

and the server is remote. This is done via IMAP, so it's a Dovecot rather than a Postfix issue. A workaround might be to configure Thunderbird to not store a copy of your sent mail and instead have Postfix BCC a copy to yourself. Or you could simply not send large attachments via e-mail. Regards Ansgar

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On 2010-03-03 Stan Hoeppner wrote: Ansgar Wiechers put forth on 3/3/2010 6:37 AM: On 2010-03-03 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: I'm not sure if there is a solution to this, but maybe one of you folks will know a workaround. After thunderbird has sent the email, it then has to save the email

Re: postfix as dispatcher

actual problem are you trying to solve? Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Anatomy of this simple spam.

. For instance: it's not clear to me if you're talking about the From: header or the envelope-from above. Also, did you follow the procedures described in the DEBUG_README? http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time

Re: Saving to Sent folder

On 2010-03-03 Charles Marcus wrote: On 2010-03-03 7:37 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: After thunderbird has sent the email, it then has to save the email ^^ to the sent items folders. This can take a long time

Re: order in cidr_table

more specific rules would never be evaluated. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Add extra headers when forwarding

On 2010-02-23 Shameem Ahamed wrote: Can i add this in main.cf? No. I want to add the extra details only for the forward maps. Can you give me some more info on ow to add this ?. man procmail man procmailrc man procmailex Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working

Re: suppress NDRs from spoofed sender

On 2010-02-19 David Koski wrote: On Monday 15 February 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2010-02-14 David Koski wrote: How about something more simple: test for From: is the same as To: and is from MAILER-DAEMON: grep ^From:.*da...@kosmosisland.com $test \ grep Return-Path:.*MAILER-DAEMON

Re: Postfix - Timeout While Sending End of Data (slightly OT)

of their solutions is too hot in the first place). However, that doesn't change anything about the fact that there are ways to view Experts Exchange pages without having to log in. Can we now drop this boring and entirely off-topic subject? Thanks. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working

Re: Postfix - Timeout While Sending End of Data (slightly OT)

On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote: On 16-Feb-2010, at 12:11, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2010-02-16 LuKreme wrote: On 15-Feb-2010, at 03:23, Barney Desmond wrote: Experts Exchange is viewable (at least) from google searches. No it isn't. Yes it is. The link you posted had no visible answer

Re: Mail in Inbox

On 2010-02-11 Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:31, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2010-02-11 Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: As for how it got there: In-Reply-To and References headers suggest that the mail was sent from one GMail account

Re: Postfix relays to all recepients

...@dontcare.org, relay=isp.provider.org[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]:25, delay=0.43, delays=0.05/0.02/0.29/0.06, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host isp.provider.org[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] said: 550 Administrative prohibition (in reply to RCPT TO command)) Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working

Re: Mail in Inbox

: 8153f3881001311541i5ec8b3a7pa24cc99ec499d...@mail.gmail.com 8153f3881001311542j4835d189g443c4976985e2...@mail.gmail.com 8153f3881002080445y11a9e370j74f65c4914c70...@mail.gmail.com 8153f3881002100148h3ac3aa76o7915583be461f...@mail.gmail.com Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time

Re: how to allow postfix to relay a single u...@domain.com

. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: how to allow postfix to relay a single u...@domain.com

, if you want to relay through your MTA from anywhere in the world. See Postfix' TLS README: http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Mail in Inbox

On 2010-02-11 Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: As for how it got there: In-Reply-To and References headers suggest that the mail was sent from one GMail account to another. Which would also explain why there are only private IP addresses involved

Re: Maildir problem2

the output of postconf -n. I doubt that anyone will read through your heavily commented main.cf to find out what your actual configuration is. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Best Suggestion For Blacklisting Senders

, and the receiving hop is the server. Of course a user's mail client (or rather Mail User Agent, MUA) is also a client. It depends on the context who is the client in any given situation. HTH Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel

Re: address_verify_sender setup

://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callback_verification Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: address_verify_sender setup

On 2010-01-21 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.net: Sounds to me like you're trying to do something like callback verification [1]. Yes he is. We're talking about details of that here. I meant to refer him to the Limitations section of that article. Regards

Re: Error: timeout exceeded (in reply to end of DATA command)

filter or policy service taking too long for checking the mail, etc. However, since the timeout occurs on the remote side, you should contact the administrator of that server about the issue. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel

Re: Avoid Relaying

Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Avoid Relaying

this route but instead reconsider using authentication. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: suppress NDRs from spoofed sender

that don't include the above mentioned headers. However, I consider those bounces useless anyway. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Successful Delivery Notification

site, and then notifies a local process of the result? No. SMTP doesn't work that way, because the next hop isn't necessarily the final destination of the mail. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: Rejecting an address with our MX

is configured to forward all mail for your domain(s) to the mailhub, and it's left to the mailhub to check if a particular address is valid, you'll be generating backscatter. Don't do that. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

Re: a little bit of help with aliases

/aliases. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning. --Joel Spolsky

<    1   2   3   4   >