Hi all!
I have a fairly standard set of smtpd restrictions implemented and generally
I’m very happy with them (very low spam traffic and no headaches associated
with SpamAssassin or DSPAM).
However, once in a while a legitimate message is rejected because the other
side has misconfigured HELO
Hi Noel,
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 11:29 PM
If you're rejecting good mail more than "rarely", you should
reevaluate your restrictions.
In particular, most built-in HELO checks are likely to reject legit
mail, and not terribly effective again
Hello Noel,
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 12:20 AM
You want to conditionally run some extra restrictions based on the
outcome of prior restrictions? Some of the existing policy servers
do weighted scoring, which gives very similar results.
Co
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: li...@rhsoft.net
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 7:29 AM
> Actually the set I have is surprisingly effective and also surprisingly
> good in keeping FPs low -- much, much better than anything I saw from SA
> and DSPAM, and with virtually no server or m
Hello Iad,
I have a user who would like to receive a notification message on her
personal email account when she gets a new email message in > her
postfix - based MailDir. She does not want the actual message, just a ping
telling her to check her email.
I'm finding a lot info on Google that
Hello,
Your mileage likely will be different, but I stopped using (content-based)
spam filtering tools altogether several years ago (previously used
SpamAssassin and then DSPAM) in favor of a (rather conservative) set of
Postfix smtpd restrictions (including Spamhaus DNSBL).
One of the reasons
Hi Robin,
I once wrote a simple script that monitors network dump for outbound
connections and coordinates them with responsible process (with command
line) or HTTP access (with host and url) info. Maybe you will find it
useful.
(Should be very much FreeBSD-dependent).
Best wishes
Eugene
--
