This is useless here because recipient_bcc_maps are handled by
cleanup(8) and not smtpd(8). You need to use a different cleanup(8)
instance which overrides the default bcc maps setting for mail coming
through this special smtpd(8) listener.
Cool! So i wrote this, and working! Thank you!
smtps i
Hello!
In main.cf I am using a global blind carbon copy table:
recipient_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/global_bcc
I would like to ignore this table, when trusted user sends a mail so i
wrote this into master.cf:
smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_wrap
Hello!
We are maintaining a couple mail hosts (>100). It's fine, cause they
generate low e-mail traffic. Now we got some new domains, and we belive
the stress will be excessive, not just bots, but i fear hackers, ddos,
etc (but the ham would be still low). To prevent risking the 100 other
dom
If I have a box with a valid reverse DNS entry of mail.example.com that
has virtual domains of
domain.com
otherdomain.com
somedomain.com
will my "wrong" reverse DNS for the virtual domains affect delivery? Do
I need to do anything?
You can simply do the following:
domain.com. MX 10 mail.examp
Hello!
I am maintaining several virtual e-mail domains, and they're growing. I
made my own scripts to modify those, in postconf/vmailbox, then issuing
postfix reload and postmap is working fine. The mailbox backend is Cyrus
over lmtp + i am using address verification, so postfix doesn't know
15 seconds? Postfix out-of-the-box waits no more than 9 seconds
for the very probe to succeed. Perhaps you have been changing
Postfix parameters. Please follow instructions as requested in
the mailing list welcome message.
Sorry, my bad, I had the address_verify_poll_delay set to 15 seconds,
w
Postfix logs delays in fine detail including the delays of address
probe messages: time in incoming/deferred queue, time in active
queue, time to complete DNS lookup and TCP/SMTP/LMTP handshake,
time to transmit message.
Apr 10 13:02:15 mail postfix/smtpd[24851]: connect from
mycomp.mydomain.co
Hello!
I see a minor glich, doesn't hurt, just would like to know what causes it.
I am using Postfix + Cyrus, using unixsocket-LMTP transport.
I am using address verification for local destinations too (Postfix
doesn't know about the cyrus users, so it uses the LMTP to discover a
user, and reac
can you show an example?
postfix log (my contract forbids to put client data here, so masqueraded
the real hostnames and IPs):
Mar 6 19:01:41 mail postfix/smtpd[6930]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
www.XXX.hu[X.X.X.X]: 450 4.1.7 : Sender address
rejected: unverified address: connect to www.XX
Hello!
I don't need to say, if your server is popular, you'll get a dozens of
spam too. Lately i am getting random mails from
www-d...@www.some.hackedsite.com . I am using address verification, so
they usually not coming in, cause port 25 is not open on
www.some.hackedsite.com (no MX record o
Halassy Zoltán írta:
(sorry pushed the send button accidentally previously)
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unverified_recipient_reject_code
> man 5 postconf
>
>reject_unverified_recipient
Yes, i know this one exists. But i guess this one would rej
(sorry pushed the send button accidentally previously)
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unverified_recipient_reject_code
> man 5 postconf
>
>reject_unverified_recipient
Yes, i know this one exists. But i guess this one would reject mails
with 5xx, when the foreig
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unverified_recipient_reject_code
Hello!
I am using Address verification now with ~90% success (using it over a
year now).
The only flaw i didn't find a solution yet is the following:
When a server rejects an e-mail address with 5xx, mine rejects it only
with 4xx. But! I would like to reject them with 4xx if the foreign
ser
Hello!
(sorry for my trash-english)
Will Postfix handle properly multiple PTR records when
reject_unknown_client_hostname is in effect?
Like would it accept an e-mail when it comes from 1.2.3.4 and
2001::1234:2 if smtp_helo_name is mail.example.com when the DNS records
are the following?
15 matches
Mail list logo