Re: Spam filter not working with mailalias

On 12/29/10 2:44 PM, Philip Van Pelt wrote: I've set up a mailserver with postfix, dovecot, amavis and spamassassin. Everything has been up and running for a year now until I noticed my spamfilter wasn't performing as it should; spam mails sent to a normal user were getting the right treatment an

Re: Postfix queue in Mysql ?

On 12/29/10 4:14 PM, Joan Moreau wrote: But I have no " car to fix" . What is that story about ? Now, I did not rule out anything in any email. Can you just tell me how to put the mailing queue in a DB (mysql database in my case) ? Exactly which part of NO YOU CAN NOT PUT THE QUEUE IN A D

Re: mail(mailutils) appending full host name instead of domain

On 12/30/10 10:09 PM, Steve Pribyl wrote: Afternoon, I am trying to setup a null or satellite client on debian system. Then you can install a null client, such as ssmtp or nullmailer. Much easier to configure than full-blown MTA, with none of the inherent risks. -- J.

Re: mail(mailutils) appending full host name instead of domain

On 12/30/10 11:05 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:00:17PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 12/30/10 10:09 PM, Steve Pribyl wrote: Afternoon, I am trying to setup a null or satellite client on debian system. Then you can install a null client, such as ssmtp or nullmailer

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On 12/31/10 11:26 PM, jason hirsh wrote: Dec 31 00:03:02 tuna postfix/smtpd[8857]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from snt0-omc1-s51.snt0.hotmail.com[65.54.61.88]: 450 4.2.0 : Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/kasdivi.com.html; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo=

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On 1/1/11 9:36 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Wietse Venema put forth on 1/1/2011 9:50 AM: Stan Hoeppner: jason hirsh put forth on 12/31/2010 3:38 PM: Dec 31 15:24:21 tuna postfix/smtpd[2514]:> asmtpout029.mac.com[17.148.16.104]: 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients Am I the only one that noticed

Re: Change error messages returned by Postfix

On 1/4/11 8:32 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote: The only rejects that I get calls or emails about are: reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, reject_unknown_helo_hostname, reject_unknown_client_hostname, Don't blindly use that. It causes a LOT of false positives. reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostn

Re: Change error messages returned by Postfix

On 1/4/11 10:04 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote: I'm trying to stop the chain of: Sender calls recipient, recipient calls their tech, recipient's tech calls me... Then I tell them to contact the sender's admin... Then the sender's admin claims that "everyone" else accepts their email, even th

Re: Forward all local delivered mail to specific address

On 1/10/11 4:28 PM, Markus Treinen wrote: Hello list, I have a nicely running Postfix installation which uses both virtual and local users. To prevent local mail being delivered to spool files, I have to alias (via /etc/aliases) the relevant users to a virtual user, which is not very elegant.

Re: TLS Not Available, Bad Syntax

On 1/10/11 10:04 PM, Bryan Harrison wrote: I've recently migrated services to a new mailserver, which has of course promptly started kicking out dire errors that didn't show during testing. Here's an example transcript, postconf -n is below Out: 220 gilded-bat.laughingboot.net

Re: not to split message across multiple domain?

On 1/10/11 10:13 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote: Hi there, I am using local transport to process messages from Postfix. When message arrives, Postfix will call a script, passing in the message, which we will process. If user sends a message with multiple recipients (in two different domains) to Postfix, I

Re: TLS Not Available, Bad Syntax

On 1/10/11 10:40 PM, Bryan Harrison wrote: Jan 10 13:00:39 gilded-bat postfix/smtpd[3076]: warning: No server certs available. TLS won't be enabled As Victor correctly surmised. -- J.

Re: Network Ideas

On 1/11/11 11:33 AM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: Isn't it generally insecure to give direct access to each repective customer instance from outside directly? Also, how do ISPs deal with this? Each customer doesn't have their own IP... ISPs "deal with this" by allowing their customers to send ma

Re: Forward all local delivered mail to specific address

On 1/12/11 4:34 PM, Markus Treinen wrote: Hi, your point is well taken. The reason for my setup is this: I wanted to have virtual addresses for all my domains, which are mapped separately to virtual users (meaning Maildirs delivered via dovecot (mainly to use sieve)). Those virtual users would

Re: smtp content_filter help needed (Vacation.pl)

On 1/13/11 8:34 AM, Mark (Lunatechnologies) wrote: Hi there, I'm using a virtual vacation script (version 3.2), which runs as a content filter for a while - but I have one makjor problem. Yes. Why would you run a per-user reply script through a system-wide content_filter ? Enable procmail

Re: smtp content_filter help needed (Vacation.pl)

On 1/14/11 12:24 AM, Mark (Lunatechnologies) wrote: Thanks Jeroen, Finally cracked it tonight. You're right - the content filter itself was unnecessary and was being run against every mail in and out. so removed that and just left the vacation transport to handle anything with an @autoreply.do

Re: Deliver @nottheoilrig.com messages -> mailbox "nottheoilrig" on localhost via LMTP?

On 1/14/11 2:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote: Understand that address rewriting is at the heart of Postfix - but I struggle to configure Postfix to deliver messages which are sent to the domain @nottheoilrig.com, to localhost via LMTP, with envelope recipient "nottheoilrig" virtual_alias_maps: @not

Re: Forward all local delivered mail to specific address

On 1/14/11 3:41 PM, Markus Treinen wrote: Am 14.01.2011 00:02, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: You alias VIRTUAL addresses to REAL users, not the other way around. The real user already has a real mailbox - why does he need to go through at least 2 extra translation steps ? Because I don't wa

Re: way to cc one email?

On 1/16/11 9:37 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: Hi List, I want to cc one incoming email, when incoming (from) field contains one email address. Is this possible in postfix? If you're talking about the MAIL FROM address, yes; use sender_bcc_maps as documented in http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.h

Re: message_size_limit

On 1/16/11 6:33 PM, James wrote: I set message_size_limit = 0 in main.conf and postfix started ok but I wasn't getting mail so I read the docs. It said mailbox_size_limit must be larger than message_size_limit so I set it to It said mailbox_size_limit = 0 and I got mail. :-) The goal was to be

Re: Postfix and multi-core platforms

On 1/17/11 7:18 AM, Jaques Cochet wrote: If postfix alone is running on the server, let's say as a mail router or backend delivey system, would postfix processes make use of all cores? That's a loaded question, since "postfix" is not a process that consumes CPU. In one (1) postfix instance,

Re: About website www.postfix.org

On 1/17/11 8:27 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Zitat von Buzai Andras : Actually he is right. "www" is just a sub-domain. The common practice (although it is not mandatory) is to have "www" setup as a CNAME for "domain.tld". Personally I think it would be nice to have "postfix.org" and "www.pos

Re: Problem with local "relay"

On 1/19/11 8:54 PM, con...@stz-bg.com wrote: My mailserver is a low load average and i did not enable blacklists, i have them commented because i checking sieve delivery to spam folder. The things that i wanna ask it is how to disable email like this one to be received. As i see header i underst

Re: cloned mx server, strange headers in sent mail

On 1/18/11 3:55 PM, James Chase wrote: I have a workign mx server (virtual) which I cloned to create a second mx server. I changed the hostname and /etc/hosts and any reference I could find to the old "mx4" name to "mx2". I also made sure reverse dns and dns is OK. It isn't. See below. Howe

Re: Problem with local "relay"

On 1/19/11 10:15 PM, Noel Jones wrote: On 1/19/2011 3:06 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/fake_domains [, anything else you have] and in /etc/postfix/fake_domains: @yourdomain.com REJECT

Re: Sender and recipient restrictions

On 1/23/11 1:34 PM, IT geek 31 wrote: On 23 January 2011 10:15, mouss wrote: Le 23/01/2011 03:45, IT geek 31 a écrit : A recent poster asked for configuration to be checked, and it has made me question my own sender and recipient restrictions: smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_sasl_auth

Re: postfix/trivial-rewrite: warning: mysql query failed: Illegal mix of collations

On 1/24/11 4:52 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: What MySQL makes of such data is up to the MySQL client and server libraries, but Postfix does not promise that the input will be well-formed UTF-8, or ISO Latin or anything of the sort. Just an array of bytes. Right, as it should be. Envelope addresses a

Re: postfix/trivial-rewrite: warning: mysql query failed: Illegal mix of collations

On 1/24/11 8:07 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: Jeroen Geilman wrote: Urgh. Which RFC are you reading ? I quote: Systems MUST NOT define mailboxes in such a way as to require the use in SMTP of non-ASCII characters True (tell it to generators of malicious mail or just incompetent sending sw). This

Re: Inbound email into script

On 1/24/11 9:33 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: Just curious, how does the script handle BCC ? Eg. where none of the TO and CC headers actually contain a "valid" email for the domain because that was in the BCC? I suppose it doesn't matter in the slightest. If the script goes off the header addresse

Re: postfix/trivial-rewrite: warning: mysql query failed: Illegal mix of collations

On 1/25/11 1:16 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: How does MySQL know that the query parameter(s) should be UTF-8 and not ISO LATIN mumble or something else? By a client executing a command: SET NAMES 'utf8' as far as I can tell. SET NAMES indicates what character set the client will use to send SQL

Re: basic question: permit SMTP from recipients or whitelist ?

On 1/27/11 7:11 AM, sunhux G wrote: I'm setting up a postfix mailserver. Only a handful (of about 6 domains , ie x...@dsta.gov.sg , x...@starnet.gov.sg , x...@ncssmsonbehalf.com.sg , x...@accenture.com

Re: basic question: permit SMTP from recipients or whitelist ?

On 1/29/11 11:39 AM, sunhux G wrote: There's only 5 mailboxes (ie a...@mydomain.com , b...@mydomain.com , ..., e...@mydomain.com ) that I'm hosting & it's using postfix. The above 5 mailboxes only receives emails fr

Re: Question about: postfix/smtpd[ ]: connect from unknown[unknown]

On 2/2/11 7:23 PM, JKL wrote: On 02/02/2011 06:17 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:30:52PM +0100, J4K wrote: The smtpd has a 'sleep 3' at the start of it. Might this have been the cause? If so, then it served the purpose. smtpd_recipient_restrictions = sleep 3, permit_

Re: recipient_bcc_maps not working

On 2/3/11 9:18 AM, l...@ds.gauner.org wrote: l...@ds.gauner.org: I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture these mails using r

Re: Delivering Mail with priority based on domain

On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote: On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote: Hi, I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list. It seems that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not prioritized. I want to make sure that I fully understand if this applie

Re: Postscreen + SenderBase

On 2/4/11 12:33 AM, David Touzeau wrote: Sorry, I rephrase How can we set PostScreen to query SenderBase DNBSL ? Best regards Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 20:37 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit : * David Touzeaumailto:da...@touzeau.eu>>: > Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with Send

Re: Question about: postfix/smtpd[ ]: connect from unknown[unknown]

On 2/3/11 1:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Jeroen Geilman put forth on 2/2/2011 2:56 PM: Debian won't have 2.8 in stable until at least 2013, although you may be able to get it as a backport later this year: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=postfix They lag behind something

Re: Delivering Mail with priority based on domain

On 2/4/11 1:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Jeroen Geilman: [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] Oops... Bad Thunderbird. On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote: On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote: Hi, I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list. It seems that

Re: Delivering Mail with priority based on domain

On 2/4/11 3:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Jeroen Geilman: One huge improvement you can make is to specify the "relay" transport for incoming mail. To achieve what ? Postfix has separate "smtp" and "relay" transports for a good reason. The scheduler uses round-robi

Re: postfix and dns lookup

On 2/5/11 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: bullshit! Way to make your case. -- J.

Re: postfix and dns lookup

On 2/5/11 7:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.02.2011 19:05, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: On 2/5/11 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: bullshit! Way to make your case. sorry, but this was the only right answer for you can not use dns-forwarder and blacklists" I don't see any answer in

Re: How to get a list of mails from mail log?

On 2/6/11 9:23 PM, meyer-jor...@t-online.de wrote: Can someone give me a hint: I'm looking for a tool to analyze the postfix mail log. I want to get a clearly arranged list of all passed (and delivered) mails (sender, recipient, date, subject [added as warning line]). The Subject: line (or a

Re: How to get a list of mails from mail log?

On 02/06/2011 11:24 PM, meyer-jor...@t-online.de wrote: Hi Jeroen! The Subject: line (or any other headers) are not logged by postfix. You could send all mail through a filter that does this for you; you are free to do anything you want in a filter. [...] Thanks for your effort. (I

Re: check_client_access using smtp auth usernames

On 02/07/2011 11:57 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: I have parenthetically asked in another - solved - thread if postfix offers the ability to control access to specific mail addresses using as a key the authenticated usernames (and got no reply). So, I am posting this as a new thread, hoping that s

Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps vs aliases file

On 02/08/2011 08:47 PM, GB GB wrote: Hello, I noticed after configuring sender_dependent_relayhost_maps and expecting it to forward mail to my listed destination does not work as expected. I need sender_dependent_relayhost_maps to forward mail depending what the the source is. Our team has spli

Re: greylisting with postscreen?

On 02/10/2011 04:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Craig Waddington: Hi, I am trying out the postscreen server - and am very impressed so far. My original interest was in greylisting - so I have the deep protocol tests turned on so that the temporary failure code 45x is returned for non-whitelist

Re: Lower which timeout values?

On 02/10/2011 07:13 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Goal: = Make mails go to a target server within 60s. Target server is defined as either: * the MX host of the destination domain * my smtp_fallback_relay which keeps trying delivery It's really fast and can take a lot of load... ... b

Re: Postfix local users & fallback relay

On 02/11/2011 09:25 AM, Pieter Steyn wrote: Hi, We currently have mail infrastructure setup like: mail.domain.co.za (primary in our dc) ptamail.domain.co.za (pta office) jhbmail.domain.co.za (jhb office) Currently we use mail.domain.co.za as the outgoing server for all users, but I want to cha

Re: Postfix local users & fallback relay

On 02/11/2011 05:36 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:54:00PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote: I've tried simply setting: fallback_transport = mail.domain.co.za fallback_transport means "use this route if other routes are not functional". This

Re: Setting up postfix with a fallback transport

On 02/11/2011 05:50 PM, Zach Wily wrote: This was designed to implement a graveyard service for mail that can't be delivered via the preferred service. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_fallback_relay I tried this, but when a message to aws-email fails, it enters SOFTBOUNCE

Re: different server for the same domain

On 02/11/2011 05:56 PM, Simone Caruso wrote: On 11/02/2011 14:56, Matteo Cazzador wrote: Thank's, i explain better why i need it, i need to do sò because i need to reduce the traffic between server b to server a and viceversa this is for me the first priority. Why don't share email storage be

Re: Setting up postfix with a fallback transport

On 02/11/2011 06:22 PM, Zach Wily wrote: On Friday, February 11, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 02/11/2011 05:50 PM, Zach Wily wrote: This was designed to implement a graveyard service for mail that can't be delivered via the preferred service. http://www.postfi

Re: Setting up postfix with a fallback transport

On 02/11/2011 08:59 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 02/11/2011 06:22 PM, Zach Wily wrote: On Friday, February 11, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 02/11/2011 05:50 PM, Zach Wily wrote: This was designed to implement a graveyard service for mail that can't be delivered vi

Re: different server for the same domain

On 02/13/2011 06:06 PM, Simone Caruso wrote: If you mean why doesn't he synchronize all mail storage between the servers - do you really think that that will DECREASE the traffic ? doesn't a san decrease traffic between servers!? That would be the case if he specifically stated he meant

Re: Issue with header_checks

On 02/13/2011 10:33 PM, Franck MAHE wrote: Hello, I've the following in main.cf header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/regexp_table My postfix release is 2.3.8 I've the following in my header_checks regex table: # MAL FORMATED EMAIL ADDRESS /^From:.*\.@.*/ REJECT "1 - Your Email addre

Re: Issue with header_checks

3 6 6042 7249 E: m...@civis.net <mailto:m...@civis.net> *De :* owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] *De la part de* Jeroen Geilman *Envoyé :* dimanche 13 février 2011 23:49 *À :* postfix-users@postfix.org *Objet :* Re: Issue with header_checks On 02/13/

Re: Issue with header_checks

ere in the localpart: /^From:.*[[\]()`;,\^#:|\\@<>/! $"%&'].*@.*/ Repeat it in the domain part if you so desire. Franck --- E: m...@civis.net <mailto:m...@civis.net> *De :* owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix

Re: Issue with header_checks

On 02/14/2011 01:37 AM, Franck MAHE wrote: OK, so this configuration seems to work fine. /^From:.*<.*(\[|\]|\(|\)|\`|\;|\,|\^|\#|\:|\||\\|\@|<|>|\/|\!|\ |\$|"|"|\%|\&|').*@.*>/ REJECT "3 - Your Email address is not compliant with RFC, Go Away" if !/^From:.*<.*@.*>/ /^From:.*([|]|\(|\)|`|;|

Re: Issue with header_checks

On 02/14/2011 02:15 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 01:45:28AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote: Any idea for the REJECT 4 to reject the header "From: us e...@domain.tld <mailto:e...@domain.tld>", ie with a space in the first part. The example I s

Re: relay_recipient and/or relay_domains issue

On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote: I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one submission to the list: ISSUE 1 I want to forward root's mail to a local user called mike. The user's email address is m...@ascendenc

Re: relay_recipient and/or relay_domains issue

On 02/15/2011 10:56 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote: On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote: I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one submission to the list: IS

Re: Multi-homed server & inet_interfaces or smtp-bind-address

On 02/15/2011 08:21 PM, John wrote: First off I am still a bit green on this stuff. Both my servers are multi-homed, server A which runs Postfix is configured -> eth0 :n.n.n.186 and eth1:n.n.n.187. The host name for this server is mail.domain.tld which points to n.n.n.187. Up until last Fr

Re: postfix/mysql multiple hosts and non-standard-port

On 02/19/2011 09:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: OK installed a second mysql-instance on my local machine with port 3307 and killed standard mysqld for testing it works with inet:host:port please add a simple notice for others in the docs now searching if this is possible for dovecot-sasl too :-)

Re: Virtual Domains, Unix Users and No Aliases

On 02/20/2011 11:03 AM, C. Comren wrote: Hi, I unsuccessfully tried to install Postfix with Dovecot as follows: 1. I have three domains with different users, e.g., al...@alice.com, al...@bob.com, b...@alice.com, b...@bob.com 2. I have Unix users and corresponding email addr

Re: How to configure postfix to reject every incoming mail with a temporary error?

On 02/21/2011 11:09 PM, John wrote: On 2/20/2011 8:05 AM, Matthias Egger wrote: Background: After getting complaints about mails which could not be delieverd to us i checked the logfiles and found nothing. By nothing i really mean nothing. Postfix did not even log a "connect from". So i sta

Re: Postfix stable release 2.8.1 available

On 02/23/2011 03:02 PM, Christian Roessner wrote: Hi, Postfix stable release 2.8.1 is available. This release fixes one "signal 11" bug with SMTP server debug logging, and cleans up some code and documentation. Ubuntu packages done. https://launchpad.net/~christian-roessner-net/+arc

Re: Postfix stable release 2.8.1 available

On 02/25/2011 08:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Jeroen Geilman: I upgraded to these packages, thanks for that. However, I was hoping the fixes mentioned by Wietse would also get rid of the incessant "postfix/postscreen[25978]: warning: getpeername: Transport endpoint is not conn

Re: How do I set up address/domain literals?

On 02/24/2011 01:29 AM, Linda Pagillo wrote: Thank you Mouss. Yes, you are correct. I did indeed mean postmaster@[ip]. I'm not having any mail rejected. I was just wondering if Postfix accepts mail to literals by default. I'm getting ready to install Postfix and I wanted to be sure that I had thi

Re: [SENDER_RESTRICTIONS] "mail from" denied for not authenticated

On 02/26/2011 09:21 PM, aa wrote: Hi all, I'm testing postfix restrictions and I would do two things: (1) I desire that when a not-authenticated user connects to my postfix server and insert the HELO and MAIL FROM commands the mail from command gets an error like this "530 authentication requi

Re: Postfix/Upstart, the final conclusion

On 02/27/2011 08:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: sorry that was because normally i use "reply all" what is needed on some mailing-lists which are sending the message with "from" as the users address and if you use there "reply" only nobody on the list will ever see a message That is normal beha

Re: Postfix/Upstart, the final conclusion

On 02/27/2011 10:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 27.02.2011 21:55, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: On 02/27/2011 08:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: sorry that was because normally i use "reply all" what is needed on some mailing-lists which are sending the message with "fro

Re: changing domain : system wide notice for all incoming email ?

On 03/03/2011 07:53 PM, F M wrote: Hello, We need to change change one of our email domain. So I would like to send a email to all incoming email, about this change. We are using Zimbra as our mail server. I added another postfix server to handle the domain alone, change the MX and used transp

Re: Mails in database.

On 03/05/2011 02:39 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote: Hi all. Is it possible to store not only user info but also e-mails in a database such as MySQL or PostgreSQL? If yes can you share your experience? There are database mailstores, yes. www.dbmail.org is one such mailstore-plus-IMAP-server. postfi

Re: Running a script, archiving, then forwarding.

On 03/06/2011 01:16 AM, Alan Fullmer wrote: I have been trying to get this to work for a while now and have been unsuccessful in my attempts. I can do each one individually, but when I try to combine them, it doesn't work as I expected it to. And I imagine it's something I am missing. I am att

Re: submission port : "Client host rejected: Access denied"

On 03/06/2011 01:18 PM, David Touzeau wrote: dear i would like to use submission port for authenticate users from internet allowing them to the postfix smtpd server For testing purpose, i have set a network different from the LAN to be sure that postfix allow SASL connections but it seems that

Re: Dovecot, Postfix and Dovecot LDA (LMTP) delivery

On 03/06/2011 04:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Remy Zandwijk: Is there a way Postfix can be told to get rid of the domain part if mail is sent through LMTP? No. The LMTP protocol, like SMTP requires complete email addresses. Wietse Additionally, overriding local_transport

Re: Running a script, archiving, then forwarding.

On 03/07/2011 12:07 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Victor Duchovni put forth on 3/6/2011 3:05 PM: On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 03:48:34PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-03-05 9:29 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: always_bcc is exactly what I would do But isn't there a problem

Re: Pcre header checks

On 03/07/2011 12:39 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Hi all, I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian. I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net but a Message-ID ending in 'yahoo.com'. I've got th

Re: timeout after CONNECT, no HELO/EHLO response from clients

On 03/10/2011 01:00 AM, Adam N. Copeland wrote: Seeing a problem with inbound delivery from relays. Incoming client connections are timing out, but I'm able to telnet to port 25 on my host and immediately get the 220 banner every time. Sometimes the connection times out before the 220 banner is d

Re: timeout after CONNECT, no HELO/EHLO response from clients

On 03/10/2011 01:56 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:14:48AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote: Mar 9 18:38:03 pmx4 postfix/smtpd[13358]: [ID 197553 mail.info] connect from unknown[134.53.6.74] okay Mar 9 18:41:03 pmx4 postfix/smtpd[13243]: [ID 197553

Re: having and custome queue in postfix same as like HOLD queue

On 03/10/2011 08:23 AM, kshitij mali wrote: HI All , My self kshitij and i am using postfix MTA for mailing service around 1.5 year EXP. I want to built an new coustome queue same as like HOLD queue . currrent sinerio is like i donot want any mail to be rejected as per my mangement instruction

Re: round-robin sending SMTP server ?

On 03/10/2011 04:55 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello Is it possible to configure postfix to use some round-robin mechanisms to send emails with several SMTP servers ? I mean to SEND emails to the external world, not to receive. Thank you. I'm not sure what you are asking for here - do you m

Re: having and custome queue in postfix same as like HOLD queue

:/etc/postfix/access_client, permit = Regards, Kshitij +91 9967490880 On 3/10/11, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 03/10/2011 08:23 AM, kshitij mali wrote: HI All , My self kshitij and i am using postfix MTA for mailing service around 1.

Re: Running a script, archiving, then forwarding.

On 03/11/2011 12:26 AM, Alan Fullmer wrote: -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 6:26 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Running a script, archiving, then forwarding. A

Re: xfermailbox

On 03/11/2011 06:26 PM, Oscar Mauricio Cruz Lazo wrote: Hi all Im trying to migrate all my mailbox system from one server to a new server, i want to use xfermailbox tool but i have a world of doubts about how to use it ? running postfix-2.4.5 plus cyrus-imapd-2.3.8-51 in both side. Please i

Re: Domain/User path vs. user@domain in mailroot

On 03/21/2011 04:11 PM, lance raymond wrote: ok next question (a little more intelligent I would hope). I am now looking at my working mail and as some test mail comes in for some users, the path is the following; /home/vmail/u...@domain.com for each. The problem is

Re: SV: SV: postfix restarts every five minute

On 03/25/2011 01:06 PM, Peter Sørensen wrote: I've already used the proxymap solution. We ran into serious problems with the clustered mysql backend. I have 5 servers with smtd set to max 300. If you're allowing 1500 concurrent smtpd's to query - say - a dozen maps each, the default value

Re: Making my own pipe..

On 03/25/2011 12:02 AM, Simon Brereton wrote: Hi I'm still trying to get Postfix to use deliverquota to deliver the mails to my Maildirs. The only thing I could find on the net was a comment from Magnus http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0412/1673.html that I had to make my own pipe. So t

Re: minor typo in Postfix's change log

On 03/28/2011 02:59 PM, Lima Union wrote: [1] postfix/verify[3209]: close database /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db: No such file or directory Are you USING sender or recipient verification ? If so, does the verify daemon run chrooted ? -- J.

Re: Postfix problem across the LAN

On 03/28/2011 07:47 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: Back in 2006 this list helped me set up Postfix on my server box in such a way that it separated local (LAN) mail from external mail, and it has worked well ever since. On my local boxes and laptops I set up transport in a very similar way, sending exte

Re: postfix can't open local recipient file .db extension

On 03/28/2011 09:01 PM, motty.cruz wrote: Hello, I'm running Postfix on FreeBSD 8.2. Postfix complaints about this line in my configuration local_recipient_database = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/userdb, hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/uservirt ITYM local_recipient_MAPS. The error: postfi

Re: postfix can't open local recipient file .db extension

mple rules to make everybody's life easier. -motty *From:* Jeroen Geilman [mailto:jer...@adaptr.nl] *Sent:* Monday, March 28, 2011 1:19 PM *To:* motty.cruz *Subject:* Re: postfix can't open local recipient file .db extension On 03/28/2011 10:03 PM, motty.cruz wrote: Thanks for your

Re: virtual_alias_maps and recipient_delimiter

On 03/31/2011 08:41 AM, Corey Quinn wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Noel Jones wrote: On 3/30/2011 3:53 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2011-03-30 Corey Quinn wrote: On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote:

Re: SMTP client host name spoofing

On 03/31/2011 07:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Wietse Venema put forth on 3/31/2011 11:42 AM: Stan Hoeppner: Received: from mail-iw0-f176.google.com (biz88.inmotionhosting.com [66.117.14.32]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F297D6C12E for; Thu, 31 Mar

Re: Methods to limit spam sent through compromised account?

On 03/31/2011 08:36 PM, D G Teed wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Stan Hoeppner > wrote: D G Teed put forth on 3/31/2011 10:21 AM: > I'd like some idea of what real world values would be useful, or additional > suggestions > on how to

Re: Configuring TLS with sender login maps

On 04/02/2011 07:17 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, I have a fedora14 box that I'm trying to configure for use with postfix with dovecot and TLS, permitting only TLS connections after authenticating with sasl. What do you mean, *after* ? It appears to mostly be working now, but mail is rejected due to

Re: Configuring TLS with sender login maps

On 04/02/2011 09:00 PM, Alex wrote: I'm using the K9 client for Android. Using this method with TLS and SASL I need port 25 open for SMTP and TLS, and 587 for submission and SASL, correct? Um.. no. Submission can be done over port 25 or 587, and can use TLS or SASL, or both, or neither.

Re: Configuring TLS with sender login maps

On 04/02/2011 09:50 PM, Alex wrote: Okay, I think I have it working correctly now. I believe my mistake was with using the incorrect ports for authentication. Authentication doesn't have a "port" - it is an integral part of the SMTP protocol. I think I may not fully understand the logic be

Re: Configuring TLS with sender login maps

On 04/02/2011 10:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 02.04.2011 21:58, schrieb Jeroen Geilman: On 04/02/2011 09:50 PM, Alex wrote: Okay, I think I have it working correctly now. I believe my mistake was with using the incorrect ports for authentication. Authentication doesn&#

Re: FW: Newbie question - being spammed using valid recipients

On 04/04/2011 06:49 PM, Bailey, Damian S. wrote: Good afternoon! Our school district has been using a Postfix/Amavis/SpamAssassin config for over a year now with good results. Just recently, however, I've noticed that my mail filtering box has been hit by a spammer that uses a handful of em

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >