Hi,
Am 2014-09-29 18:18, schrieb Mike.:
On 9/29/2014 at 10:44 AM Mike. wrote:
|I cleaned up my pslogscan.sh script a bit. Aside from some general
|cleanup, I did some re-formatting of the output to make it look a
bit
|cleaner, and allow for some flexibility in display widths. I also
|went
hi wietse,
Am 2014-06-17 15:39, schrieb wie...@porcupine.org:
Wietse Venema:
[] Stopping Postfix Mail Transport Agent: postfix/usr/sbin/postconf:
warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
ldap_transport_result_filter=smtp:%s.24t.loc:25
Apparently, postconf 2.9-2.12 error
hello list,
on debian 7.5 i installed postfix 2.9.6 with postfix-ldap package.
in the main.cf:
...
ldap_transport_result_filter = smtp:%s.24t.loc:25
virtual_mailbox_maps =
ldap:ldap_users
## wichtig!! ldap:ldap_users muss hier mit aufgefuehrt werden, sonst
werden alle Mails
hello,
viktor or any other.
in the postfix tls readme: In order to use TLS, the Postfix SMTP server
generally needs a certificate and a private key. Both must be in PEM
format.
i have setup this way in my main.cf:
smtpd_tls_CAfile=
hi list,
sorry to ask, but i CANT remember how the option is named in the main /
master cf.
theres an option to limit outgoing mails,
lets say the mailserver has to send 1000 mails to google.com, u can say
with this
option not more then 10 mails at once to deliver.
does any know what i mean
Hello,
Am 2014-01-09 05:26, schrieb Seann:
Paul,
First thing that caught my eye, is it looks like the reason for the
bounce was the filter shell script died:
Command died with status 1: /usr/local/bin/filter.sh.
Command output:
Jan 9 02:49:28.913 [29829] warn: netset: cannot
hello list,
its me again from hamburg.
i googled some time to find a solution for following scene:
incoming mails for import...@dingdong.com , should be copied to
mob...@dingdong.com AND
if Attachements are in the mail, they should be stripped out.
Only in the account import...@dingdong.com
hello list,
we use LDAP in Postfix for User Management.
Now i should setup a second LDAP server and postfix should use the
second LDAP server when the first is not longer available.
i searched inet but didnt really find a solution. can u help me or guide
me?
thank you
marko
hallo patrick,
Am 2013-11-13 10:29, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
* Marko Weber | ZBF we...@zackbummfertig.de:
hello list,
we use LDAP in Postfix for User Management.
Now i should setup a second LDAP server and postfix should use the
second LDAP server when the first is not longer available
Hello,
Am 2013-10-14 14:12, schrieb Dan Langille:
I have a group of Postfix servers. I want communications between these
servers to be TLS and clients must present a known certificate.
These servers are also public-facing and accept incoming mail from
servers not under my control.
I just
hello,
i use list.dnswl.org in postscreen_dnsbl_sites .
in the logfiles i see:
Sep 19 12:17:18 mail postfix/dnsblog[15318]: warning: dnsblog_query:
lookup error for DNS query 35.64.91.217.list.dnswl.org: Host or domain
name not found. Name service error for name=35.64.91.217.list.dnswl.org
Hi Wietse,
Am 2013-09-04 23:45, schrieb wie...@porcupine.org:
Marko Weber | ZBF:
hello postfix list,
maybe an easy quest for you.
when i use multiple rbls in 'postscreen_dnsbl_sites'
Yes...
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
1.list.org
anotherlist.org
nsafools.org
obamaisadrama.org
hello postfix list,
maybe an easy quest for you.
when i use multiple rbls in 'postscreen_dnsbl_sites'
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
1.list.org
anotherlist.org
nsafools.org
obamaisadrama.org
at example.
are the entries of 'postscreen_dnsbl_sites' used in order like listed?
or is postscreen
Hi,
Am 2013-08-13 18:10, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
On Aug 13, 2013, at 17:34, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/13/2013 10:26 AM, Philippe Bloix wrote:
What i would like is :
For example, my postfix relay accepts about 1000 emails (1 shot)
from a SMTP client, then the postfix
hello,
Am 2013-07-23 10:19, schrieb Phil Daws:
Hello,
I would love to integrate DSPAM with AmaViS and read somewhere that
the best way for retraining would be to use a custom hook. My
thinking is that the custom hook should check the SA score and if that
believes it is SPAM then it would pass
hi,
Am 2013-07-11 12:58, schrieb wie...@porcupine.org:
Przemys?aw Orzechowski:
Hi
I need to setup server that will ratelimit outgoing mail but will
accept
all messages from authenticated users regardles of ratelimit.
I know its somewhat strange approach but ... its higherups decission
Am 2013-06-19 09:56, schrieb Grant:
I think I need to tell munin where my postfix logs are
(/var/log/mail/current) since I use metalog. How can I do that?
Instead of searching online, use the built-in pod based format, e.g.:
$ munindoc postfix_mailstats
You just improved my life.
You
Am 2013-06-04 15:00, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Grant skrev den 2013-06-04 01:45:
The big config change I see referenced with regard to 2.10 is
smtpd_relay_restrictions but I don't see how that could be related.
My smtpd_relay_restrictions is blank.
suggest to make it not in main.cf, but use
hey wietse,
Am 2013-05-23 21:33, schrieb wie...@porcupine.org:
Marko Weber | ZBF:
when i change a cidr map,
do i have to reload postfix like on chnages by texthash?
i was on http://www.postfix.org/cidr_table.5.html
and cant find that info.
It is safe to assume that if you change a file
hello list,
i find error entries like these in my logs:
postfix/smtp[16790]: warning: TLS library problem:
16790:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
number:s3_pkt.c:340:
does that mean openssl or something is broken on my machine?
thanks
marko
Am 2013-05-22 17:54, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
I find error entries like these in my logs:
postfix/smtp[16790]: warning: TLS library problem:
16790:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
number:s3_pkt.c:340
Hi Patrick,
Am 2013-05-17 00:20, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
Marko,
* Marko Weber | ZBF we...@zackbummfertig.de:
hello,
i set in amavid.conf : $final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS;
but in logs i see this lines;
May 16 23:22:11 mail amavis[15703]: (15703-13) Passed BAD-HEADER-1
,
* Marko Weber | ZBF we...@zackbummfertig.de:
hello,
i set in amavid.conf : $final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS;
but in logs i see this lines;
May 16 23:22:11 mail amavis[15703]: (15703-13) Passed BAD-HEADER-1
{RelayedOpenRelay,Quarantined}, [***.***.***.***] apache@***.de -
r...@domain.de
hello ,
i find many of these in my mail.log:
May 16 14:27:33 mail opendkim[2926]: 119CA2FB20: s=dktest
d=porcupine.org SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad
signature
is my openssl broken or something else glitchy? or does this mean the
dkim from porcupine.org ist invalid?
Am 2013-04-24 15:59, schrieb Tony Nelson:
After reading through the recent Postscreen DNSBL threads I decided
to give it a try.
I used Rob's example from http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html [1]
as a leaping off point, but chose to leave pipelining disabled until
I'm sure I understand what I
Am 2013-04-04 10:12, schrieb Muzaffer Tolga Özses:
On 04/04/2013 10:30 AM, Antoine Nguyen wrote:
Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net wrote:
Good morning everyone :)
Do you guys know of a tool that will act like pflogsumm, only based
on
domain and graphical?
Regards,
Hi,
take a look
The table was created many years ago over an extended period of
time,...::
so, its outdated?
i think its better to use postscreen and a regular updated file like
DROP from spamhaus.
i refresh this DROP every hour. so maybe wrong listed candidates are
deleted in the refreshed
i sometimes mail with the deutschebank.
when i send mails i use a tls_policy_map:
db.com secure
match=loninmrp23.uk.db.com:nyjinsmp07.us.db.com:loninmrp22.uk.db.com:loninmrp14.uk.db.com:nyginsmp02.us.db.com:nyjinsmp01.us.db.com
.db.com secure
Am 2013-03-22 18:50, schrieb Noel Jones:
On 3/22/2013 11:44 AM, Victor d'Agostino wrote:
Hi all,
I use postfix as relay server to several internal domains. xxx is
the main one.
postconfig | grep domain prints :
append_dot_mydomain = no
mydomain = xxx
myorigin = $mydomain
relay_domains =
Am 2013-03-26 10:30, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 26.03.2013 09:44, schrieb Marko Weber|ZBF:
Mar 25 14:04:35 mail postfix/smtpd[31103]: Untrusted TLS connection
established from
loninmrp15.uk.db.com[160.83.44.131]: TLSv1 with cipher
DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
why is on incoming mails
hello,
i see alot of entries from postfix/dnsblog in my logs like this:
postfix/dnsblog[30381]: warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error for DNS
query 140.99.145.217.xx.zen.dq.spamhaus.net: Host or domain
name not found. Name service error for
The one Mailserver, that is doing mailing for N Domains,
only need one Certificate.
Other thing is with websites, they need each one.
connect multiple ip´s to the server for multiple websites ssl certs.
but the mailserver only one for himself.
the other mailserver dont look what domain sends
case and not's typical to do, and for this I prefer to
comment to this list.
If anyone knows how to create this rule, be grateful
Thanks
On 25/02/2013 10:46, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
The one Mailserver, that is doing mailing for N Domains,
only need one Certificate.
Other thing is with websites
Rene,
why dont u use POLICYD for that?
It can do the things u need and much more.
have a look on http://policyd.sf.net/
dont reinvent the whhel.
marko
Am 12.07.2012 16:12, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Ren? Klomp:
Thanks. So that is the problem. What is the difference between
smtp and the pickup
rene,
sorry, look here http://www.policyd.org/content/features
Am 13.07.2012 09:23, schrieb Marko Weber:
Rene,
why dont u use POLICYD for that?
It can do the things u need and much more.
have a look on http://policyd.sf.net/
dont reinvent the whhel.
marko
Am 12.07.2012 16:12, schrieb
hello,
when i do on console
# postfix reload
i get:
/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
virtual_create_maildirsize=yes
/usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
virtual_mailbox_extended=yes
/usr/sbin/postconf: warning:
hello list,
is there a way to give postfix a fallback if amavid-new is not
reachable?
situation: when amavis is down or not reachable, postfix should skip to
deliver to amavis
and skip this step.
is there a way for this?
thank you,
marko
parameter:
virtual_maildir_limit_message=Sorry, the user's maildir has overdrawn
his diskspace quota, please try again later.
postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
transport_destination_recipient_limit=1
Am 08.06.2012 11:03, schrieb Marko Weber:
Hello,
i use virtual user
mynetworks_style=host
-o
receive_override_options=no_unknown_recipient_checks,no_header_body_checks,no_milters
all works as expected.
maybe this helps another one with same problem any day.
marko
Am 12.06.2012 13:00, schrieb Marko Weber:
hello list,
back again ;-)
on the dovecot list i got hint
Hello,
i use virtual user and virtual domains in postfix with mysql.
to existing users the mails will be delivered.
but when i create a alias (postfixadmin), the mail is bounced.
Jun 8 10:50:40 mail dovecot: auth-worker: sql(postmas...@zbfxxx.de):
Unknown user
Jun 8 10:50:40 mail
Hello,
i try to send mails to postmaster@ + abuse@ to the mailserver i work
on.
I get these log messages on the server when mails arrive for
postmaster/abuse:
Multi-recipient bounce 550 5.5.3
Jun 7 10:14:01 mail postfix/lmtp[18106]: C976F11C688:
to=postmas...@test.de,
Am 07.06.2012 14:40, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Marko Weber we...@zackbummfertig.de:
Hello,
i try to send mails to postmaster@ + abuse@ to the mailserver i work
on.
I get these log messages on the server when mails arrive for
postmaster/abuse:
Multi-recipient bounce 550 5.5.3
Jun 7 10:14
hello,
on our mx01 and mx02 we validate recipient adresses with
'reject_unverified_recipient'.
now i one case, the mx01 or mx02 connects on the destination machine
and tries to validate the recipient.
the result is:
550 5.1.1 p...@domainn.tld: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable
You can try with the default:
postscreen_greet_wait =
${stress?3}${stress:8}s
you still get error message then ?
marko
Am 15.05.2012 13:20, schrieb vishesh kumar:
Hi Members,
I have following setup related to postscreen greeting
---
WTF !
Am 04.05.2012 13:12, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067
The evidence section lists inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255,
yet
spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)!
93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche Telekom dialups
:|
hello,
is there any benefit of multiple check_helo_access?
i see in some configs check_helo_access is in smtpd_helo-
smtpd_sender- smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
my understanding is that check_helo_access is in
smtpd_helo_restrictions enough.
am i wrong?
thanks,
marko
Hello List,
is an postfix reload performing an postfix upgrade-configuration ?
Or do i have to execute postfix upgrade-configuration seperately?
when do i have to use postfix upgrade-configuration?
normal edits in the main.cf / master.cf i can activate with postfix
reload, or?
thank you,
hello,
i plan a postfix server as mx-backup.
how can i control on this mx-backup, that people dont use this server
as main mx?
is there a way to do this?
thanks from cloudy hamburg
marko
Am 23.04.2012 06:50, schrieb Olivier Pavilla:
Hi everyone.
For several months my smtp is harassing by someone located in Taiwan.
This people is using any taiwanese IP.
My logs are ful with this something like this:
Apr 23 06:35:31 corellia postfix/smtpd[26906]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from
Hello,
i see some Servers greeting with this:
250-barracuda.annonet.de Hello mail.tig.de [x8.x6.5x.1x9], pleased
to meet you
Is it possible to such personel Greetings in Postfix too?
marko
hi list,
Under MAIL EXCHANGER POLICY TESTS
i see this:
By listening on both primary and backup MX addresses,
postscreen(8) can deny the temporary whitelist status to
clients that connect only to backup MX hosts.
I dont get it at all.
When my backup MX is not on the same
hello list,
i set in my main.cf
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
but in the logfiles i find this:
Dec 1 08:25:05 fallbackhost postfix/smtp[1204]: warning: unsupported
SASL client implementation: cyrus
Dec 1 08:25:05 fallbackhost postfix/smtp[1204]: fatal:
Hello,
is it possible to rate the amount of sent mails per user?
Goal is: each mail user should not be possible to send more then 10.000
mails each day.
And is it possible to set per user (mailaccount) ?
thanks
marko
Hello i created an etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr in my postfix
dir.
now postscreen checks on connect for the entries.
i set one server in the list with reject
Is it right, that the test mail goes thru postfix?
i see in logs :
Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: CONNECT
Thanks rob0,
when i set
postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
all works like a charm.
marko, from sunny hamburg
Am 27.09.2011 17:08, schrieb /dev/rob0:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 09:52:16 Marko Weber wrote:
Hello i created an etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr in my postfix
dir.
now
55 matches
Mail list logo