Sorry i ve found the problem, i putted domain to be sent in "mydestination"
Thx.
Le 25/05/2018 à 13:00, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> pat G:
>> Ok it is better now than yesterday, it can receive requests.
>> However, when one of our internal mails server send a messa
, but like if he wanted to send message in local
mailbox...
Did i miss something for that it send in external domains/server ?
Thanks,
Le 24/05/2018 à 16:22, Dominic Raferd a écrit :
> On 24 May 2018 at 15:01, pat G wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i am working on a relay server
Hello,
i am working on a relay server, but it isn't functionnal.
my main.cf is :
http://paste.debian.net/1026390/
but i ve theses errors in logs :
http://paste.debian.net/1026400/
did i miss something or did i do something wrong ?
Thanks,
Patrice G
what can be the solution ? i use :
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
here my postconf -n :
<http://paste.debian.net/970772/>http://paste.debian.net/971113/
thx for your help,
Pat.
ate/lmtp
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
did i miss something ?
thx
pat.
. I'd like postfix to rewrite the
envelope to match.
Thanks.
--Pat
etc, etc, etc). It just seems to make a lot more sense to set it
at the edge of what I control.
Thanks!
--Pat
As you can see, although DKIM and SPF pass individually, the DMARC
policy still marks SPF as "fail" simply because the 5322.From is
"somedomain.com" and 5321.MailFrom is "mymailserver.com".
Is there a simple directive to give Postfix so that it always passes
"MAIL FROM" matching the "From" for trusted hosts?
Thanks a million,
--Pat
.14.101]:25, delay=0.4,
delays=0.08/0/0.05/0.27, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0
<20140603223145.5990.41578.78@tuxcard.com> [InternalId=33291352] Queued
mail for delivery)
Jun 4 07:33:24 dilbert postfix/qmgr[23578]: 2B907BF76A5: removed
Pat Hirayama
CIT / Infrastructure Operations
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
phira...@fhcrc.org
hi,
I have a server on which a restore job went wrong and all files in Maildir
have the date of the restore, not of the file creation. Is there a script
to extract the correct date from the mail headers and touch the files
itself with the correct date?
PAT
--
*Pat Erler*
Gtalk/G+: per
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:13:59 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>> Does anyone has ever use Plesk or another graphical interface
>> to manage Postfix ?
>
> postfixadmin just works, so i keep my problem :-)
We're equally happy with Postconf (postconf.com).
Pat
d security. A secondary problem is the sending of non-RFC
compliant 7 bit clean headers. My preferred solution would be tagging for
evaluation but a web search has turned up nothing straightforward.
Pat
among other
factors).
Speaking only for myself, for the foreseeable future we are not interested in
experimental code and do not want to use a version of bind or postfix that
cannot
be compiled to refuse IDNs.
Pat
mmand ?
We use postconf (.com) for exactly this (web queue management), over a half
dozen
postfix servers. It has buttons for sa-learn, hold, unhold, delete, ... Only
thing
missing is a tool to work across the queue i.e., delete all messages on hold
where
subject == xyz.
Pat
a direct option, but you should be able
> to source them similarly.
What we have is a password file and Dovecot sockets (as defined in dovecot.conf
and
master.cf). How would one source them directly for user validation? What
would the
corresponding main.cf section look like?
Pat
could find was to set the primary
domain up as a virtual but that won't work in this environment.
Seems like such a simple problem, to use an alternate passwd file or query
Dovecot directly before accepting a recipient. What am I missing?
Pat
: Hirayama, Pat
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Alias Expansion Problem
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:52:33PM -0700, Hirayama, Pat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently converted from sendmail, and postfix seems to be having problem
> with a recursive alias we use.
>
> So,
7;ve tried adjusting virtual_alias_expansion_limit and
virtual_alias_recursion_limit -- but even upping them to 1 doesn't seem to
remedy the situation.
Any thoughts on what I should be setting to address this issue?
Thanks,
-p
--
Pat Hirayama
IT / Server Operations
Fred Hu
e processed,
or will it then move onto the "reject_unknown_hostname" and get rejected
because it does not not have a dns entry?
If this is the case is there some way around this?
Thanks,
Pat Grogan
19 matches
Mail list logo