El Miércoles 22 Junio 2016, Admin Beckspaced escribió:
> Am 22.06.2016 um 15:32 schrieb Christian Schmitz (list):
> > Hi:
> > I have a postfix running on opensuse LEAP42.1. This distro have journal
> > as default logging system, i really dislike this system and i want that
>
Hi:
I have a postfix running on opensuse LEAP42.1. This distro have journal as
default logging system, i really dislike this system and i want that postfix
create their own "/var/log/mail-postfix" file.
Is possible?
If yes, How i can do it?
If no, how i can change the logging system?
Best regar
We would like to use the Cassandra database to persist the state of
abusive IPs which we would block from connecting in one of the
smtpd_xxx_restrictions clauses. We have systems that exist in multiple
data centers and Cassandra works really well for persisting data between
them, but Postfix d
I would like to transport messages for a specific address to a python
application to do a few things then push the message back to postfix for
delivery to their maildir. I am wondering what is the best way to put
that message back into postfix without it looping back through the
transport?
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:05:26 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Mail List :
>> I am in the process of setting up postfix 2.9.6, postgrey, and dovecot
>> 2.1.7 on a clean install of Debian wheezy 7.6 AMD. I'm doing this very
>> systematically in a VirtualBox virt
5 14:29:31 VMailServerTest postfix/smtpd[16181]: fatal: no SASL
authentication mechanisms
I'm probably doing something very simple wrong, but I can't see it. I
was hoping some of the august lurkers on this list could take a look at my
settings and see where I'm going wrong.
Here are
On 08/04/2014 01:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> However, this is generally a waste of
> time, nobody cares what the server's banner or EHLO name says.
I care that EHLO contains something reasonable, or I will reject the
connection. But that's me.
(signed)
Bastard Mail Admin from Hell
Hi we have a virtual domain setup when sending emails from a virtual
somain dont want the local domain to appear in the headers.
For example as you can see bellow when sending emails from a virtual
email account (con...@vmail.eu) .
inside the header information the localhostt is sent(
lkjsdfgsa
On 4/23/14, 3:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
List:
Are there any plans or existing projects that support connecting Postfix
to a Cassandra cluster to execute CQL queries for table lookups? Or any
other NoSQL databases?
If someone has a plan, then they are welcome to implement it!
For a simple
Are there any plans or existing projects that support connecting Postfix
to a Cassandra cluster to execute CQL queries for table lookups? Or any
other NoSQL databases?
On 4/15/14, 3:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:25 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 3:12 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:02 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using
On 4/15/14, 3:12 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 3:02 PM, List wrote:
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does
not appear
On 4/15/14, 2:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/15/2014 2:27 PM, List wrote:
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access
using a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does
not appear to be rejecting clients when the query returns "REJECT"
(whic
I am running postfix 2.6.6 and trying to setup check_client_access using
a mysql lookup under the smtpd_client_restrictions, which does not
appear to be rejecting clients when the query returns "REJECT" (which
has been confirmed to return "REJECT" using postmap -q xxx mysql:..).
When I change
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:44:07AM -0500, Ron Scott-Adams wrote:
>
> I?ve updated a working user on this test server from r...@tohuw.net to
> r...@joab.tohuw.net. Under the previous address, I could successfully
> complete a telnet session and convey mail for r...@tohuw.net to the local MTA.
>
deed, this has nothing to do with your local resolver.
>
> > Hmmm... Hover.com is still not supporting DNSSEC, but I can still
> > validate my domains?
> >
> > That's not exactly what you said, is it?
>
> Does your domain registrar control (or even ask to contro
Hello Michael,
On 02/03/2014 02:41 PM, m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
> 3 feb 2014 г. 17:08:31 GMT+04:00, IMAP List Administration
> wrote:
> >
> >Indeed, the problem was being caused by bug(s) in the OpenBSD
> >implementation of
> >gethostbyaddr().
>
> Care to gi
[resending to list, where I meant to send it...]
Hi Wietse,
On 01/31/2014 04:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> IMAP List Administration:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4,
>> and
>> at the same time w
Hello List,
a week or so ago I upgraded my OpenBSD mail server from OpenBSD 5.3 to 5.4, and
at the same time went from postfix-2.9.6 to postfix-2.11.20130710.
postfix-2.11.20130710 is the OpenBSD 5.4 default package, in case someone is
wondering "why that?".
I
> Yes. But, are you sure the problem is the mail header and not the
> MAIL FROM command?
No, I'm not sure. However, considering some servers will also reject
mail where the From: header domain is inconsistent with envelope
hostnames, I suppose it doesn't matter. Either way, I need postfix to
som
So here's the problem:
An unusual server rejects mail on the basis that the domain portion
of the FROM address in the header does not match the IP address of
the server.
So I need to compose a message like this:
From: anything@
To: ...
Subject: ...
and I need postfix to replace the
On 11/13/13, 11:52 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:18:32AM -0600, List wrote:
I am building a script to handle some specific recipients so I will
be using transport to handle their domain. The script may run for a
long period of time (up to 30 seconds) and I am wondering
I am building a script to handle some specific recipients so I will be
using transport to handle their domain. The script may run for a long
period of time (up to 30 seconds) and I am wondering if there is a way
for the script to let postfix know I have received the message and let
it continue
On 10/19/13 3:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:56:59AM -0500, List wrote:
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which
is an alias to 3000 local users.
What kind of "alias"? Are you using virtual(5) aliases via
virtual_alias_maps, and wi
I wanted to confirm the behavior we are experiencing at the moment when
delivering messages to addresses aliased to thousands of local users.
For example we have the address distgr...@domain.tld which is an alias
to 3000 local users. When our inbound spam filter connects to the
Postfix server
On 10/2/13 10:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:17:16AM -0500, List wrote:
We are currently using dovecot for smtp auth, and due to an increase
in spammers abusing smtp auth we setup dovecot to return an invalid
login for user's that have been set to "disabl
We are currently using dovecot for smtp auth, and due to an increase in
spammers abusing smtp auth we setup dovecot to return an invalid login
for user's that have been set to "disabled" in our provisioning system.
This seemed to work for a while (preventing spammers that are using
auth), but
On 2013-05-02 23:02, Nick Bright wrote:
On 5/2/2013 10:53 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
Greetings,
After having a problem with a lot of mail being queued by a
compromised end users mailbox, I was unable to find a script able to
remove messages from the queue based on the sasl_username.
The pfdel s
2012 at 09:55:11PM +0100,
>IMAP List Administration wrote:
>> I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on
> That's a pre-release snapshot. Postfix 2.9 is up to patchlevel 4.
so now I have a release version of postfix.
> That's very old. 9.4.3 was
On 11/27/2012 12:40 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm facing a boring problem for few accounts ( less than 10 over 2000 )
> on my freebsd 9.0 mailhub , see below the error message I get in maillog
>
>
> Nov 27 17:59:45 mail postfix/local[11988]: 3Y9n2B5TH9zYmgf:
> to=, orig_to=, relay=local,
On 11/14/2012 11:06 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> I've been getting client requests from this ip as well, i've put it into a
> permenant spamd(8) blacklist.
that's highly interesting, but:
1) the sender was legitimate
2) my problem is some sort of intermittent DNS lookup failure
3) that addre
Hello Folks,
I'm running a postfix (postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2) server on OpenBSD v5.1. We
have a number of anti-UCE postfix measures in place, including
"reject_unknown_client_hostname", which we quite like. It's hard to believe
there are so many spammers that can't overcome such a low obstacle.
On 10/10/2012 11:04 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I think I may not what's wrong. Here's the master.cf settings:
>
> In reading the docs it says to comment out the smtp line and uncomment
> the one that routes to postscreen. I have both uncommented.
>
> # grep -v "#" /usr/local/etc/postfix/master.cf
>
> Now can anyone point me to the part in the RFC that prohibits the "-" at the
> start of the local part? Because this limitation only exists for domain parts
> afaik. -u...@domain.com should be OK! u...@-domain.com should NOT!
As noted on this list by Noel Jones two days
On 9/7/2012 4:44 PM, General Mail wrote:
> On 9/7/2012 4:04 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> General Mail:
>>> On 9/7/2012 3:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
General Mail:
> /etc/postfix/access
> ad...@bombshellz.net OK
> no-re...@bombshellz.net OK
> * REJECT "$access_map_reject_code Y
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Jack S wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a problem that I am trying to resolve in emergency mode.
> I have a bunch of email in the derferred queue for a domain, their
> destination server will be down for a while so I need to create a way
> to get messages to them no
Hello Folks,
I'm using postfix-2.9.20120102-sasl2 with cyrus-imapd-2.4.13p0 on OpenBSD v5.1.
There are unix-users and pure-cyrus-users on the system. Most of the unix-users
have mail delivered to an identical cyrus-user, but for a few "local" transport
should be used.
What is the best way to ar
On 8/27/2012 3:03 PM, Juerg Reimann wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Please excuse my probably rather novice question but I couldn't find any hint
> on this. The document at http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html says
> it should be possible to reject an email with a before-queue content fil
On 8/21/2012 11:02 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
>
> On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
>>
>>> Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
>>>
>>> [root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
>>> Host 107.178.2
On 8/21/2012 10:03 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
> configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
> working.
>
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
On 8/15/2012 6:41 AM, Sense Zeng wrote:
> postfix version: 2.9.3-2
> system: ubuntu 12.04
>
> postfix is configure as a smarthost
> How can I permit some localuser send mail in shell (run sendmail) and
> deny other users?
Please refer to 'man 5 postconf' and search for authorized_submit_users
or ht
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
>>
>> In summary,
>>
>> Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft
On 8/8/2012 3:03 PM, email builder wrote:
>
> I don't think mine is so confusing as you suggest if you take a second to
> understand it. Maybe if you read it with some whitespace:
>
> select
> if ('%d' = 'example-2.com',
> IFNULL(
> (select dest from aliases where addr =
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:21 AM, mailing list subscriber
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have two issues.
> After hard reading of MULTI_INSTAN
update: interesting, header_check gives 5xx but user unknown gives
correct 4xx response:
Jul 30 01:49:01 mailhost postfix-in/smtpd[3685]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from relay3.isp.ro[IP_ADDR]: 450 4.1.1 :
Recipient address rejected: User unknown;
from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
On 7/26/2012 8:31 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Den 2012-07-26 13:16, Wietse Venema skrev:
>
>>> will it be possible at all to drop berkdb now ?
>>
>> Postfix has always supported systems without Berkeley DB. Such
>> systems have some other default_database_type setting. For example,
>> SunOS, HP-U
Ok, this¹ has been raised over a few times in the past, but I'm not
satisfied with the answer (referral to man page of lmtp/smtp instead
of idiot-proof narrative version like other *_README howtos).
1. Do the cached file contents still apply to current release version
of postfix?
2. If yes, why is
On 7/10/2012 1:36 PM, Feel Zhou wrote:
> Thanks for Brian's answer*
> *
> 1 I add the missed,such as
> [root@mail postfix-2.9.3]# make -f Makefile.init makefiles
> CCARGS="-DHAS_MYSQL -I/usr/local/mysql/include"
> AUXLIBS="-L/usr/local/mysql/lib -lmysqlclient"
> and still have the pr
On 7/10/2012 11:52 AM, Feel Zhou wrote:
> Hello My friend
>
> My system is Centos 6.2 with postfix-2.6.6, When I use command
> postconf -m, and got many support:
> btree;cidr;environ;hash;ldap;mysql;nis;pcre;proxy;regexp;static;unix;
> So I down the new version postfix-2.9.3, and use make install,
On 7/3/2012 11:02 AM, Marko Weber wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> when i do on console
>
> # postfix reload
>
> i get:
>
> /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
> virtual_create_maildirsize=yes
> /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter:
> virtual_mai
On 6/26/2012 2:46 AM, Ram wrote:
> I have a custom milter in C ( for email archiving ) which works fine
> on my servers with postfix 2.8+. ( RHEL 5.5 )
>
> When I tried to install the milter on a ubuntu box with postfix 2.7 ,
> unless I create the socket inside spool directory for eg.
> /var/spool/
On 6/15/2012 9:26 AM, Alain Deseine wrote:
> When i try locally, using telnet, it's ok again :
>
> *ks3094730:~ # telnet localhost 25
> Trying ::1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 xxx..fr ESMTP Postfix
> EHLO TETE
> 250-AUTH GSSAPI LOGIN PLAIN DIGEST-MD5
> *
Notic
On 6/4/2012 2:07 PM, james wrote:
> We are seeing a message that I don't understand on our postfix servers
> with postscreen enabled. Here is a rejection message from maillog when
> a test tries to e-mail abuse@ address:
>
> 2012-06-04T12:45:23.773219-04:00 mx2 postfix/postscreen[4312]:
> NOQUEUE:
On 5/25/2012 1:13 PM, JL Picard wrote:
> #Here are some modifications (in diff format) to master.cf to get more
> logging:
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -v
> smtp unix - - n - - smtp -v
Please do not post or enable verbose logging unless asked. It generally
masks the real issue.
> #Here is the lo
On 5/22/2012 10:33 AM, varad gupta wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
> I need to replace all occurences of "text1" in mailbody with "text2".
>
> The regexp =>
>
> /^(.*)text1(.*)$/ REPLACE $1text2$2 works if there is only one
> occurence of "text1" in a line.
>
> It changes only the last occurence of "text1" in
On 5/16/2012 2:07 PM, James Lay wrote:
> On May 16, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> The answer to that question can be found in "man 5 transport".
>> However, you don't want to mess around with a reject-users table in
>> the first place (particularly not as a transport map). Instead jus
gt; hope that makes sense…thank you.
>
> James
The expected behavior is to reject unknown users.
You should list valid users as noted in the ADDRESS_CLASS_README.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html
Once this is accomplished, unknown recipients will be rejected individually.
Most
mail.
In addition, be careful how high you set this or issues may arise.
There have been reports to this list where overflows have occurred.
It may be platform dependent, but my minimal research found the
(message|mailbox)_size_limit parameters are a signed 32-bit integer.
This will limit the parame
On 4/17/2012 3:55 PM, n756...@50mail.com wrote:
>
> FROM: "n###@###.com"
> TO: b...@domain.com, m...@domain.com
>
> For that message send, postfix logs on my end show:
>
> Apr 17 11:52:48 mail postfix/smtpd[23367]: connect from
> smtp.myprovider.com[1.2.3.4]
> Apr 17 11:52:48
is could not allow postfix to restart.
> That is why I resort to this. Is there another way around this?
Welcome to the list!
Unfortunately, you seem to have missed the important welcome message:
"TO REPORT A PROBLEM, PLEASE SEE
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail";
Specifically
On 4/3/2012 9:32 AM, Kizito Thomas wrote:
> Dear good people,
> I am trying out Mailscanner for the first time in my life, I have this
> test postfix server that has been working properly until when I added
> a line:
> /**/
>
I highly recommend to use amavisd-new instead of Mailscanner.
The former
On 3/29/2012 6:56 AM, Phill Edwards wrote:
>
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
> > permit_mynetworks, check_relay_domains
>
> You'll want a reject_unauth_destination after these.
>
>
> Sorry but I don't have any idea what that means. Could you please
> explai
On 3/28/2012 5:19 AM, Priscilla V wrote:
> We have configured to consider ldap users also in /etc/nsswitch.conf.
I'm not an LDAP expert, but it seems as if you are looking up a full
email address.
Please be aware that alias_maps lookups only send the bare user name.
Queries targeting "j...@exampl
t my VPS end up as an open relay.
>
> Long story short, heres my main.cf:
This list prefers 'postconf -n' because of mistakes people make,
including spelling and listing a parameter twice.
The command shows what Postfix is running and in alphabetical order for
easy rea
On 3/5/2012 1:08 PM, James Chase wrote:
> Is there any postfix configuration that will allow rejected mail to be
> viewed or mail from a certain user to be saved despite reject/accept
> status for debugging? Postfix is blocking an incoming message saying
>
> mx1 postfix/cleanup[7139]: 6F3FBE4079:
On 3/1/2012 11:49 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> I had thought it was related, but another issue I'm trying to figure
>>> out is how to prevent a single remote server from sending thousands of
>>> messages at a time, filling the queue, and causing significant
>>> delivery delays for all mail.
>> Is it
On 2/28/2012 1:54 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/2012 12:25 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> On 2/28/2012 11:48 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>> I'm new to postfix so I've got a lot of learning to do.
>> Welcome to Postfix.
>>
On 2/28/2012 11:48 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I'm new to postfix so I've got a lot of learning to do.
Welcome to Postfix.
>
> One of the basic questions I have is this:
>
> I'm wanting to use bl.spamcop.net. From what I can discern, I've got
> to put this in my main.cf in a section named
> smtpd
On 2/16/2012 2:15 PM, Toomas Vendelin wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have set up a home e-mail server with Postfix and Cyrus, and
> everything seems to work. There is one matter I'd like to clarify,
> though.
> Is it so, that if I use "non-Postfix" virtual mail
On 2/15/2012 11:57 AM, Jack Knowlton wrote:
> On Wed, February 15, 2012 5:37 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Jack Knowlton wrote:
>>> I'm looking into implementing a check_recipient_access as a table
>>> inside a MySQL database. It&
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:19:05 -0800, Ori Bani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts or opinions about the
> best linux filesystem to use for an email system. There will be some
> small amount of website data on the system (including webmail to read
> the emails), althoug
On 2/8/2012 12:07 PM, Mr fix wrote:
> Just tried that brute force and worked.your reference validates the issue.
>
> These things generally happen when we jump 4 versions in one shot, thank you
> very much for pitching in.
>
> We have multiple instances running so as per older way they distrib
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:32:55 +, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:25:04PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> SIX major releases is a lot, even having the fact
>> that Wietse is very careful with changes in mind
>>
>> the problem is that even he can not say what exactly
>> has
Wondering if anyone has made this leap recently, and what changes/gotchas
might be pertinent?
ther, and maybe
> temporarily disabled depending on site policy.
>
> I'm not quite sure how an RBL would be useful here.
>
>
> -- Noel Jones
What we were thinking was using RBLs to dynamically block known malicious
IPs before allowing SMTP Auth to occur, hopefully seeing a decrease in
spam. Not sure if this would have unintended consequences, which is why I
am consulting the list.
We run a small cluster of postfix servers that are dedicated outbound
relayhosts for our customers. Beyond the outbound postfix cluster we have
another cluster of mail filtering appliances that have served their purpose
very well, but we are starting to get more compromised account due to
phishing
On 1/31/2012 9:54 AM, Eric Jacobs wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> I'm new to postfix. Been working with sendmail forever but for a new
> mailserver my boss (actually his boss) has a thing for postfix and
> against sendmail. So I'm scrambling to learn.
>
> One thing that has come up is that in the near fut
On 1/18/2012 12:10 PM, Jon August wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We
On 1/18/2012 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:59, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We have a postfix machin
On 1/18/2012 11:41 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2012 17:36, schrieb Jon August:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a postfix machine setup as described here:
>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-11.10
>>
>> and we would like to use a t
On 12/13/2011 2:17 PM, Gonzo Fernandez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not too familiar with postfix but our server seems to stop sending
> emails usually only on the weekends. The rest of the week it's fine
> but once it gets to about Saturday/Sunday morning it gets stuck. I've
> come in usually on Mond
We currently run three load balanced outbound postfix servers and need to
integrate a policy service that can track messages per hour for SASL users.
We hope to have a service that can be cluster aware, or know how many
cumulative messages have been sent by all the servers in the cluster per
user p
On 12/8/2011 2:17 PM, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_auth_destination,
This restriction at this location will IGNORE all RBL lookups when mail
is destined for your system.
I suggest removing it as it is implied if reject_unauth_de
und so far are with Cyrus or
> Dovecot.
>
> P.
The Postfix documentation is quite extensive on this subject.
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_sasl
Brian
>
>
> - Αρχικό μήνυμα -
> Απο: Brian Evans - Postfix List
> Προς: postfix-users@postfix.org
>
On 11/30/2011 12:55 PM, Peter Tselios wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I would to like to enable SMTP authentication, as an option feature for our
> users, but I have some questions before doing so.
> 1st: Is it possible to enable it, without Cyrus of Dovecot? I do not want to
> install Cyrus of Dovecot on my
On 11/22/2011 6:35 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Mark Goodge :
>> I am suffering from AOL numpties who click "this is spam" on
>> notification emails they get (by their request!) from a forum and
>> mailing list hosted on my server. In order to trap these, I'v
n the past week, Postfix logs to your syslog
daemon.
It will basically only send the facility, level and message.
It does not choose what to do with it.
Some syslog daemons, such as syslog-ng, can log to a database.
This is beyond the scope of this list and you should really find support
for your s
On 11/15/2011 3:48 PM, Justin wrote:
> New to postfix please bare with us. :)
>
> We like to accept special characters in email id so surrounding the
> email names with "", but still these emails are sent to fallback maildir.
>
> Followed this man page --> http://www.postfix.org/aliases.5.html
> T
On 11/10/2011 7:26 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I have configured two instances of postfix 2.8 and it’s working fine
but I want to separate logs of each instance to be different than the
other instance .
How can I do that?
Regards
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#syslog_name
Rea
permit_sasl_authenticated,
>> reject_unauth_destination
>>
>> However I am getting relay denied errors for clients using an IP in
that
>> range:
>
> CIDR notation is not supported in indexed files.
>
> If you want to use CIDR notation, you must either use
Kshitij,
To clarify we have three methods of relay. The first being the
mynetworks, the second a dynamically generated file (popimap_access) that
has remote ips for pop and imap clients added for relay, and the third is
smtp auth. We need to be able to do all three methods.
Thanks
On Thu, 3 No
In mynetworks I have the following IP configured (among others):
204.9.157.0/24 OK
In main.cf mynetworks is listed in the recipient restrictions:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/popimap_access,
permit_sasl_a
On 11/3/2011 9:32 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi I am just trying to run policyd-spf and postgrey. However whatever I do I
> seem to get errors of the form:
>
> [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# postfix reload
> postfix: fatal: /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf, line 227: missing
ty
> strategies.
>
> Can anybody point me to examples, howtos, or what have you on building a
> high-availability mail cluster - I'm running Postfix, Amavisd,
> Spammassassin, ClamAV (plus Sympa for list management, and UW IMAP - but
> those aren't technically par
On 10/10/2011 2:32 PM, Erik Christiansson wrote:
> I'm trying to get postgrey up and running, but I seem to have a
> problem with the ordering of my restrictions.
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> permit_mynetworks,
> reject_invalid_helo_hostn
On 10/5/2011 4:01 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> But dspam crashed and I removed dspam again to get mail traffic up.
>
> My problem is now that some mails are queued and I cannot resend them
> because it seems that postfix want to use a content filter I alread
> disabled.
> The old line in master.cf
We currently have a system setup to allow mass mailings sent via a single
one time address with an :include: statement that points to a list of local
users. We would like to simplify the process by having this done using the
existing mysql database of users based on their gid, but not sure how
I was wondering if ODBC support was on the road map for Postfix, or if it
has ever been discussed?
Thanks.
ative packages to the CentOS 5 version.
They have been discussed many times on this list.
Alternatively, if you must stay with pure CentOS, version 6 includes
Postfix 2.6.6 (http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos).
Version 2.3.x (and 2.4.x) has expired in support for development update
On 9/2/2011 12:28 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using postfix 2.3 on CentOS and I would like to disable SSLv2. If
> I do the following:
>
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = SSLv3, TLSv1
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = medium, high
>
> but despite the fact that this configuration has b
1 - 100 of 590 matches
Mail list logo