On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:33:31PM +1000, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > [ Yes, one could also craft "classless" access(5) tables, ... and rely
> >only on explicit transport(5) table entries, opting out of all the
> >taxonomy that makes it easier to reason about Postfix mail
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users writes:
> (...)
> [ Yes, one could also craft "classless" access(5) tables, ... and rely
> only on explicit transport(5) table entries, opting out of all the
> taxonomy that makes it easier to reason about Postfix mail routing,
> but this is not a good
On 5/05/2023 11:52 am, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users wrote:
While Wietse has his word processor open, I'd like to share a few of
my greatest misdirects in my evolving understanding of Postfix.
To quote a like minded individual
I simply want to help others avoid my points of confusion, in
[ Yes, one could also craft "classless" access(5) tables, ... and rely
only on explicit transport(5) table entries, opting out of all the
taxonomy that makes it easier to reason about Postfix mail routing,
but this is not a good idea, and users advanced enough to do that
aren't the
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:00:55AM +1000, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users
wrote:
> check_rcpt_maps() in smtpd_check.c first looks for the recipient in
> rcpt_canon_mapsand virt_alias_maps, that's the class-less part. Then it
> classifies the recipient domain and checks the relevant recipient
On 8/05/2023 10:19 am, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users:
ADDRESS_CLASS_README:
The most misleading place for me was the ADDRESS_CLASS_README
For "The virtual alias domain class" it says:
"Valid recipient addresses are listed with the virtual_alias_maps
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:55:28AM +1000, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Q: how would an entry in virtual_alias_maps like
> localpart@$virtual_alias_domains localpart@$virtual_alias_domains be
> handled?
> A: It would stay in $virtual_alias_domains and be handed to
>
Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users:
> ADDRESS_CLASS_README:
>
> The most misleading place for me was the ADDRESS_CLASS_README
>
> For "The virtual alias domain class" it says:
> "Valid recipient addresses are listed with the virtual_alias_maps
> parameter"
> which is of course true, but there is
ADDRESS_CLASS_README:
The most misleading place for me was the ADDRESS_CLASS_README
For "The virtual alias domain class" it says:
"Valid recipient addresses are listed with the virtual_alias_maps
parameter"
which is of course true, but there is nothing special about the virtual
alias domain
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> I looked at docs (*README) and haven't found any.
>
> I'd still prefer to explicitly note that virtual_alias_maps are applied
> even for non-local e-mail
> ...you use "all email deliveries", I wonder if something like
> "all emails processed (even
On 05.05.23 11:52, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users wrote:
>While Wietse has his word processor open, I'd like to share a few of
>my greatest misdirects in my evolving understanding of Postfix.
>
>To quote a like minded individual
>
>I simply want to help others avoid my points of confusion, in
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> On 05.05.23 11:52, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users wrote:
> >While Wietse has his word processor open, I'd like to share a few of
> >my greatest misdirects in my evolving understanding of Postfix.
> >
> >To quote a like minded individual
> >
> >I
On 05.05.23 11:52, Sean Gallagher via Postfix-users wrote:
While Wietse has his word processor open, I'd like to share a few of
my greatest misdirects in my evolving understanding of Postfix.
To quote a like minded individual
I simply want to help others avoid my points of confusion, in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
