Am 10.03.23 um 17:12 schrieb Marvin Renich via Postfix-users:
Additionally, every MUA that I know of recognizes a subject beginning
with "Re:" or "RE:" and when replying avoids duplicating this in the
reply subject.
While I have used mutt exclusively for a long time to send email, I
Am 10.03.23 um 11:07 schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users:
Dnia 10.03.2023 o godz. 18:18:50 Phil Biggs via Postfix-users pisze:
Likewise, To keep my mail client's threaded view sane I resorted to using
header_checks:
/^Subject: \[pfx\] (.*)$/ REPLACE Subject: $1
What a mail client has
* Robert A. via Postfix-users Cooper:
> Some of us don't have a choice and are stuck with MS mail products due
> to work policies. while OWA does now support header filtering, that
> has not always been the case.
So you are saying that even Microsoft has finally seen the light. Good,
it took
Reichelt via Postfix-users
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 13:21
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: [pfx] Re: The joke writes itself.
This message is from an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization
* Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
> * Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
> > I don't need tags.
> Seconded. Do we really need to cater for software that's unable to use
> the "List-Id" headers? These are mailing lists for Postfix users and
> devs, not for a knitting circle, so I
On 3/10/23 13:54, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
I don't need tags.
Seconded. Do we really need to cater for software that's unable to use
the "List-Id" headers? These are mailing lists for Postfix users and
devs, not for a knitting circle,
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
> I don't need tags.
Seconded. Do we really need to cater for software that's unable to use
the "List-Id" headers? These are mailing lists for Postfix users and
devs, not for a knitting circle, so I think it is fair to assume we
subscribers all use decent
* Cooper, Robert A via Postfix-users [230310 09:59]:
> I posted about the List-ID changing three days ago, but it seems to
> have gotten lost in the prefix discussion. for the record, I like
> list prefixes. It's easier to filter on subject than on headers that
> may or may not be present from
Hi.
On Fri Mar 10, 2023 at 14:57:41 +, Cooper, Robert A via Postfix-users wrote:
> I posted about the List-ID changing three days ago, but it seems to have
> gotten lost in the prefix discussion. for the record, I like list prefixes.
> It's easier to filter on subject than on headers that
ia Postfix-users
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 07:16
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: [pfx] Re: The joke writes itself.
This message is from an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization
--
* Mal v
* Mal via Postfix-users [230310 03:23]:
>
>
> On 10/03/2023 5:24 pm, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> > I was also quite happy with
> > no tags at all.
>
> +1 no tags
I wholeheartedly agree. The subject tag hinders, rather than helps,
reading list mail. The List-Id provides better
11 matches
Mail list logo
