mouss escribió:
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez a écrit :
Why is the mail not being rejected due to
reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch? I must have a silly bug but I
couldn't find it... :-(
I got to solve it by:
smtpd_sender_login_maps = $virtual_mailbox_maps
do not reuse maps
On 3-Dec-2008, at 15:44, DJ Lucas wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is
to
On 3-Dec-2008, at 16:53, mouss wrote:
DJ Lucas a écrit :
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope
sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can
DJ Lucas wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
Very likely there are other, better ways to combat this spam. Look
for other traits you can use to reject it.
I am, by no means, anything even close to expert WRT the whole SMTP
process, but, I do think that I can provide (or at least what I believe
to
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is to intentionally
deceive the recipient. Is there any other
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is to intentionally
deceive the recipient. Is
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is
to intentionally deceive the recipient. Is there
DJ Lucas a écrit :
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is
to intentionally deceive the
DJ Lucas escribió:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C222318376
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Jul
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez escribió:
DJ Lucas escribió:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
DJ Lucas escribió:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Received: from gangotri.ubuntu.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gangotri.ubuntu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C222318376
J.P. Trosclair wrote:
I have been working on a similar if not the exact same problem from what
I've seen in this thread. The problem being from = to address and how to
stop spam that does this. My idea for a solution to this problem was to
require any mail claiming to be from a local account
Noel Jones wrote:
Very likely there are other, better ways to combat this spam. Look
for other traits you can use to reject it.
I am, by no means, anything even close to expert WRT the whole SMTP
process, but, I do think that I can provide (or at least what I believe
to be) a valid,
Noel Jones escribió:
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
Hello,
Spammers often send (forged) mail where mail from address is the
same as
rcpt to address. An extension of that could be using a mail from
address where src domain is one of our valid virtual domains. I can only
think of 3
Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
Noel Jones escribió:
You are (again) right, perhaps spamassasin is better for performing this
kind of check... with the added bonus that filtered mail is not dropped,
but quarantined (so you could always rescue a false negative). Do you know
how well does
15 matches
Mail list logo
