On 3-Dec-2008, at 16:53, mouss wrote:
DJ Lucas a écrit :
LuKreme wrote:
On 2-Dec-2008, at 20:21, DJ Lucas wrote:
I can find absolutely no reason to inadvertently mislead, or worse,
intentionally deceive the recipient by forging the envelope
sender's
address. In fact, the only reason I can see, is
to intentionally deceive the recipient. Is there any other reason?
Sure there is.
No there isn't.
Yes. there is;-p can we agree to disagree or do we need to contact
the UNO?
Maybe.
The FROM_ (the envelope from, the SMTP transaction from, etc) should
always be the actual source of the message. If acme.tld is sending a
message on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] then the FROM_ has to be
acme.tld. The From: should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is no reason to
lie in the SMTP transaction about who you are, and spoofing that is
going to be a spam-tag to many servers.
I touched on this in a previous message, the FROM_ and the Received
headers should match up in some way, even if 'matched up' is simply an
SPF match for the FROM_
--
Well I've seen the Heart of Darkness/Read the writing on the
wall/an the voice out in the desert/Was the voice out in the
hall
