Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-25 Thread Nikolai K. Bochev
I provided a reply with info on the setup i use it in. While i do realize that it is far from big, it certainly proves that policydv2 is stable enough to be used in medium or large deployments and it does work and scale good enough. What i don't get is why does it bother you mentioning v2. v1 wo

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-24 Thread mouss
Nikolai K. Bochev a écrit : > And your point is ? please do not top post. my point is what I said: v2 has nothing to do with v1. it's the same name but it's not the same program. if you have something to say about this, feel free to express yourself... Until then, - v1 is a single threaded C pr

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-24 Thread Bas Mevissen
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 19:31 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > > Anyway, the solution is simple > > u...@example.com = Rejected as spam > user+extens...@example.com = possibly accepted. > Good point. Bas.

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread LuKreme
On 23-Mar-2010, at 19:31, LuKreme wrote: user+extens...@example.com = possibly excepted. ACCEPTED. Doh. -- Windle shook his head sadly. Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind. --Reaper Man

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread LuKreme
On 23-Mar-2010, at 03:55, Bas Mevissen wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:24 +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote: Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the "@" as a key to see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing. That's what address extension was i

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread LuKreme
On 22-Mar-2010, at 05:17, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: you really should take a look on it. http://www.policyd.org/ I did take a look at it, built the database for it, read the INSTALL document very carefully. I get to step 10. 10. Fire everything up and browse to the web gui to configu

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Matias wrote: > Hi, > > I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so that I > can access the greylist database from more than one server. > > I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc... > > Can you recommend any of these? > > > Which

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread Nikolai K. Bochev
And your point is ? - "mouss" wrote: > Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit : > note that v2 has nothing to do with v1. It is unfortunate to see the > > same product name used for two different things. v1 was a single > thread > > C program. v2 is a perl program (I like perl. this isn't the > issu

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread mouss
Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit : > > gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic when > i used it. > > i switched to policyd and never had problems it's MySQL based > and can implement greylist and some other features. > > i'm still using policyd v1, i didnt migr

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread mouss
Luciano Mannucci a écrit : > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:17:42 -0300 > Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: > >> gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic >> when i used it. > I use gld on a dedicated server. > It scales very well :-) > Never had a problem either... > > luciano. goo

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread Nikolai K. Bochev
I've been using policydv2 for quite a while now. It's easy to install and manage, it's under active development ( well maybe not so active but oh well ) and it plays nice. I am using it for both greylisting and accounting. Especially i found the accounting feature very useful, since my primary o

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread joe
On 03/22/2010 02:23 AM, Matias wrote: Hi, I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so that I can access the greylist database from more than one server. I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc... I've used postgrey and sqlgrey, but for the past few years I'

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread Bas Mevissen
wasn't added to some spam list behind the scenes. But there too, I'm > able to say that spam is not a major problem for me. HELO checks and > Zen catch all but a few. > That's my experience too. I used to have a few hand-written rules and SA working together with over 95% p

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread /dev/rob0
o be fair, I have used user+t...@addresses in other situations, and in those cases it's not possible to say with certainty that user@ wasn't added to some spam list behind the scenes. But there too, I'm able to say that spam is not a major problem for me. HELO checks and Zen catch all

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread Bas Mevissen
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:24 +0100, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote: > > Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the "@" as a key to > > see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing. > > That's what address extension was invented for. See the respective > secti

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2010-03-22 Bas Mevissen wrote: > Why catch-all? Because I often use the part before the "@" as a key to > see the origin of the e-mail when subscribing. That's what address extension was invented for. See the respective section of man 8 local. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "Abstractions save us

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-23 Thread Angelo Amoruso
Matias wrote: Hi, I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so that I can access the greylist database from more than one server. I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc... Hi, I've tried gld with success and satisfaction. I recommed it to you! Angelo

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-22 Thread Bas Mevissen
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:23 +0100, Matias wrote: > Hi, > > I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so > that I can access the greylist database from more than one server. > > I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc... > I use sqlgrey on CentOS 5.4 with postfix

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-22 Thread Luciano Mannucci
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:17:42 -0300 Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: > gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic > when i used it. I use gld on a dedicated server. It scales very well :-) Never had a problem either... luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino,

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-22 Thread Gmail-teopro
Hello Leonardo, I use sqlgrey on several slack machines form more than 3 years and I'm totally satisfied. Give it a try. It worth. Monday, March 22, 2010, 1:17:42 PM, you wrote: > gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic > when i used it. > i switched to poli

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-22 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Matias : Hi, I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so that I can access the greylist database from more than one server. I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc... Can you recommend any of these? You can easily access postgrey from more than

Re: Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-22 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues
gld is very outdated, it couldnt handle medium to large traffic when i used it. i switched to policyd and never had problems it's MySQL based and can implement greylist and some other features. i'm still using policyd v1, i didnt migrated to v2 yet. Anyway, V1.82 can handl

Greylist server recommendations?

2010-03-22 Thread Matias
Hi, I want to move away from postgrey to a sql based greylist service, so that I can access the greylist database from more than one server. I've been reading about sqlgrey, gps, gld, etc... Can you recommend any of these? Which one are you using? Thanks!