I provided a reply with info on the setup i use it in. While i do realize that it is far from big, it certainly proves that policydv2 is stable enough to be used in medium or large deployments and it does work and scale good enough.
What i don't get is why does it bother you mentioning v2. v1 won't be developed any further. Yea i know it works, our older setups use it and still do, without any problem for years, but you could be using qmail instead of postfix for the same reason. As far as the naming goes, it's up to the author to decide that. ----- "mouss" <mo...@ml.netoyen.net> wrote: > Nikolai K. Bochev a écrit : > please do not top post. > > > > my point is what I said: v2 has nothing to do with v1. it's the same > > name but it's not the same program. if you have something to say about > > this, feel free to express yourself... Until then, > > > > - v1 is a single threaded C program. v2 is a complete rewrite in perl. > > it has absolutely nothing to do with v1 > > > > - v1 was used in a large ISP setup. I have no information about v2 > being > > used anywhere > > > > ... > > > > using the same name for two different solutions is not honest. -- Nikolai K. Bochev System Administrator
