Re: Header Check Assistance

2009-05-15 Thread mouss
Drew Tomlinson a écrit : [snip] OK, I think I understand now. uribl is a way to check mail content for domains that *appear* in spam, not from where the mail is sent. Good idea! I will see about adding that to SpamAssassin. yes. and also consider adding the BRBL (Barracuda DNSBL) to

Re: Header Check Assistance

2009-05-14 Thread mouss
Drew Tomlinson a écrit : Is there some rule about submitting questions with the string Help in the subject? I've tried posting the following note with the subject of Help With header_checks and received a bounce message indicating this error: BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org: Admin

Re: Header Check Assistance

2009-05-14 Thread Drew Tomlinson
mouss wrote: Drew Tomlinson a écrit : Is there some rule about submitting questions with the string Help in the subject? I've tried posting the following note with the subject of Help With header_checks and received a bounce message indicating this error: BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org:

Re: Header Check Assistance

2009-05-14 Thread Drew Tomlinson
mouss wrote: Drew Tomlinson a écrit : mouss wrote: I have no preference for header_checks. What makes client_access better? Is it less expensive? it's time to learn how smtp works. in particluar, the fact that the message is sent after the DATA command. which means that if you

Header Check Assistance

2009-05-13 Thread Drew Tomlinson
Is there some rule about submitting questions with the string Help in the subject? I've tried posting the following note with the subject of Help With header_checks and received a bounce message indicating this error: BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org: Admin request: /^subject:\s*help\b/i