mouss wrote: > Drew Tomlinson a écrit : > >> mouss wrote: >> I have no preference for header_checks. What makes client_access >> better? Is it less expensive? >> > > it's time to learn how smtp works. in particluar, the fact that the > message is sent after the DATA command. which means that if you reject > before DATA, you avoid having to read the message (including the headers). >
Thank you. This makes sense to me. >>> .[snip] >>> >>> but you'll have a lot of work to track the domain names. See if uribl is >>> good for you... >>> >>> >> Yes, I'm using several blacklists. >> > > you didn't understand what I was suggested. > OK, I think I understand now. uribl is a way to check mail content for domains that *appear* in spam, not from where the mail is sent. Good idea! I will see about adding that to SpamAssassin. [snip] Thanks for your help. I appreciate it. Drew -- Be a Great Magician! Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com
