Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Linux Addict wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Blake Hudson wrote: > >> >> Original Message ---- >> Subject: Re: Header Time >> From: Linux Addict >> >> >>> I dont think th

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Blake Hudson wrote: > > Original Message > Subject: Re: Header Time > From: Linux Addict > > >> I dont think this is something to do with outlook as I tested with yahoo >> and gmail as well. I see the same p

Re: Header Time

Original Message Subject: Re: Header Time From: Linux Addict I dont think this is something to do with outlook as I tested with yahoo and gmail as well. I see the same pattern. Looks to me message leaves postfix with updated time stamp. �Is there any verbose can enabled

Re: Header Time

Linux Addict wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sahil Tandon > wrote: On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict mailto:linuxaddi...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe < g...@slsware.com

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:17 PM, ghe wrote: > I can't say much because I know next to nothing about Outlook and friends, > but MS keeps time in local time (I hear), and *nix goes on GMT, and there's > a 4 hour time correction for your local time, and you're seeing a 4 hour > time change in your h

Re: Header Time

I can't say much because I know next to nothing about Outlook and friends, but MS keeps time in local time (I hear), and *nix goes on GMT, and there's a 4 hour time correction for your local time, and you're seeing a 4 hour time change in your headers in mail being passed between *nix and MS. B

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe < > g...@slsware.com>wrote: > >> On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: >> >> A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them i

Re: Header Time

On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe wrote: On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems to doing

Re: Header Time

On 6/25/09 12:06 PM, Linux Addict wrote: I am curious where its getting the -400(EDIT) from. It's EDT, not EDIT. It means that the local time (Eastern Daylight Time) is 4 hours less than GMT... -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com

Re: Header Time

* Linux Addict : > We are, but these aren't even going out. There is a transport map which > directs it to internal exchange servers. > > I am curious where its getting the -400(EDIT) from. Please show the exact header... and 2 lines before and after. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT

Re: Header Time

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:41 PM, ghe wrote: > On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: > > A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in >> outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems >> to doing -400 (EDT). >> > > Hmmm. 4 hours. Are you usin

Re: Header Time

On 6/25/09 9:50 AM, Linux Addict wrote: A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems to doing -400 (EDT). Hmmm. 4 hours. Are you using greylisting? -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com

Header Time

Hi, I am sure someone can clarify it for me. A device uses postfix relay to send mails out. When I receive them in outlook, they are 4 hrs behind. When I looked at the header, postfix seems to doing -400 (EDT). by postfixmta.domain.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 62B1257AB5 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:16