On 2022-01-16 04:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Not keeping the mail in memory for to better support large mails is on
my TODO
list for dkimpy-milter.
fuglu is already using dkimpy, but not dkimpy-milter, would you help
fuglu devs on make fuglu support milters ?
both is python btw
On Saturday, January 15, 2022 8:08:51 PM EST Robert Siemer wrote:
> > > Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
> > > and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the
> > > previous step in the headers.¹
> >
> > Prepending a header does not
> > Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
> > and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the
> > previous step in the headers.¹
>
> Prepending a header does not require rewriting the message body.
> Postfix queue files support efficient
> > So far I see that the after-queue content filter mechanism
> > (FILTER_README) forces you to write the email to disc again. (And
> > for no good reason, unfortunately: pipe should pass a read-only
> > file descriptor of the queue file to filter?s stdin. The filter
> > can use lseek() on that.)
Robert Siemer:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
>
> Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
> and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of
> the previous step in the headers.?
>
> A DKIM signer can do
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 08:01:05PM +0100, Robert Siemer wrote:
> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
No worries, you can do this with a milter, without storing
an extra copy of the complete message.
> Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
>
It appears that Benny Pedersen said:
>On 2022-01-15 20:01, Robert Siemer wrote:
>
>> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
>
>insane
agreed
>> A DKIM signer can do this by either keeping the message in memory (a
>> no-go for me) or write it to a file.
>
>will a mount point on
Robert Siemer wrote:
> Gmail allows 150MB. Ok? And with that they are right. That is not
> "insane". Insane is the opposite: to reject an email, because a
> single file attachment ended up a little bigger than expected. Total
> user experience disaster.
I think you have me confused with someone
Gmail allows 150MB. Ok? And with that they are right. That is not “insane”.
Insane is the opposite: to reject an email, because a single file attachment
ended up a little bigger than expected. Total user experience disaster.
So could we concentrate on answering my question or solving the
On 2022-01-15 20:01, Robert Siemer wrote:
I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
insane
Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate
and sign the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the
previous step in the headers.¹
what is your
Robert Siemer wrote:
> I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
I know you say you need this. But even if you had it would it
actually be useful to you?
DKIM is needed to interchange email with random email servers around
the Internet. Because said random servers will reject the
Hello everyone,
I need to DKIM sign possibly huge emails (up to 150MB).
Conceptually DKIM needs to go over the email twice: once to calculate and sign
the checksum and once to write it out with the result of the previous step in
the headers.¹
A DKIM signer can do this by either keeping the
12 matches
Mail list logo
