Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-21 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Mike Guelfi wrote: If people want to use a non RFC compliant verification system, then they're going to have problems with false positives on their spam filter. The operative word being: they. Your customer needs to get their email vendor to whitelist your trac

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-21 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, Peter wrote: I would move your check_recipient_access to smtpd_data_restrictions, then it should work that it will not reject until the DATA command, but servers performing address verification will have bailed by that point. So you end up rejecting actual messages but not

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-20 Thread Mike Guelfi
If people want to use a non RFC compliant verification system, then they're going to have problems with false positives on their spam filter. The operative word being: they. Your customer needs to get their email vendor to whitelist your trac instance. You don't need to do anything

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-19 Thread Peter
On 19/03/17 02:26, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > Hello, > > I'm operating a bug tracker which sends out emails to participants > notifying of ticket changes. For new submitters it often happened, that > they simply did reply by mail which wont work with this instance. > > Now I changed our setup a bit >

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Dirk St?cker: > On Sat, 18 Mar 2017, Richard Damon wrote: > > >> - On your side, don't reject RCPT TO for the no-reply address. > >> > >> - On your side, add a telepathic policy service that can distinguish > >> between RCPT TO to verify an address, and RCPT to deliver mail. > >> > >>

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-18 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017, Richard Damon wrote: - On your side, don't reject RCPT TO for the no-reply address. - On your side, add a telepathic policy service that can distinguish between RCPT TO to verify an address, and RCPT to deliver mail. smtpd_recipient_restrictions =

Re: [SPAM?] Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-18 Thread Richard Damon
On 3/18/17 11:39 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Dirk St?cker: : host mail.remotemail.tld[X.X.X.X] said: 550-Verification failed for 550-Called: Y.Y.Y.Y 550-Sent: RCPT TO: 550-Response: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Dirk St?cker: > : host mail.remotemail.tld[X.X.X.X] said: > 550-Verification failed for 550-Called: > Y.Y.Y.Y 550-Sent: RCPT TO: > 550-Response: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient address > rejected: THis trac does

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-18 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017, Wietse Venema wrote: I'm operating a bug tracker which sends out emails to participants notifying of ticket changes. For new submitters it often happened, that they simply did reply by mail which wont work with this instance. Now I changed our setup a bit In postfix

Re: How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Dirk St?cker: > Hello, > > I'm operating a bug tracker which sends out emails to participants > notifying of ticket changes. For new submitters it often happened, that > they simply did reply by mail which wont work with this instance. > > Now I changed our setup a bit > > In postfix main.cf:

How to setup a no-answer email properly

2017-03-18 Thread Dirk Stöcker
Hello, I'm operating a bug tracker which sends out emails to participants notifying of ticket changes. For new submitters it often happened, that they simply did reply by mail which wont work with this instance. Now I changed our setup a bit In postfix main.cf: smtpd_recipient_restrictions