Robert Moskowitz skrev den 2013-01-13 19:49:
I did take this off list to Wietse, but it is worst than you make it
out to. It can even vary by sender to a list.
reply-all in roundcube sends ONLY to maillist not private
while reply ONLY reply private
why cant all others copy that ? :)
On 1/12/13 9:55 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and that is the really sad thing of this thread
the subject is about REPLY-TO headers
but WTF - there is NO reply-to header at all
reply goes back to the sender while it would go back
to the list if the messages WOULD contain Reoly-To
so if your
I am surprised by all the apologetic replies about mailing lists,
when Reply-To: is in fact standardized for more than 30 years,
and it has nothing to do with mailing lists.
Wietse
Citing from RFC 5322 section 3.6.2 (published 2008):
When the Reply-To: field is present, it indicates
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:41:26AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I am surprised by all the apologetic replies about mailing lists,
when Reply-To: is in fact standardized for more than 30 years,
and it has nothing to do with mailing lists.
Furthermore, way upthread the original request was to
I did take this off list to Wietse, but it is worst than you make it out
to. It can even vary by sender to a list.
I apologize, a little for top posting. Another deadly list sin, but I
did not want this buried all the way at the end.
This message from Harald, if I reply to sender it goes
On 01/12/2013 04:35 PM, Peter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level - dbmail
i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
supressed so i do not need them too in a
Speaking of broken, this thread exists because software ignores the
Reply-To: header which was defined in RFC 822 30+ years ago, and
which exists to this date in RFC 5322.
So if you guys could file a bug report, that might help more than
apologizing for user interface issues.
Wietse
On 01/13/2013 02:15 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Speaking of broken, this thread exists because software ignores the
Reply-To: header which was defined in RFC 822 30+ years ago, and
which exists to this date in RFC 5322.
So if you guys could file a bug report, that might help more than
apologizing
Richard Damon:
On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
your email until you play by the same
Am 12.01.2013 14:49, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Richard Damon:
On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will
On 1/12/2013 7:49 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Richard Damon:
On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
Am 11.01.2013 15:33, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
Sorry
Am 12.01.2013 15:18, schrieb Matthias Andree:
Am 11.01.2013 15:33, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I WILL work more at paying attention to what works here.
Your headers reveal you are using Thunderbird; it can't be that hard to
click List reply or whatever the button inscription translates to in
On 12-01-13 15:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
but as said - there are a lot of mailing-lists out there which are
configured by morons where this all does not work as it should or
is destroyed because many users on other lists are doing permanently
reply-all and if your server is configured like
Am 12.01.2013 17:45, schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 12-01-13 15:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
but as said - there are a lot of mailing-lists out there which are
configured by morons where this all does not work as it should or
is destroyed because many users on other lists are doing permanently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level - dbmail
i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
supressed so i do not need them too in a different folder to save
two seconds
Am 12.01.2013 22:35, schrieb Peter:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level - dbmail
i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
supressed so i do not need them too in
On 1/12/13 8:49 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Richard Damon:
On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
mean? grep of this message-source from the list
does not contain any REPLY-TO headers to respect!
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~/Desktop]$ cat source.txt | grep -i reply-to
Subject: Re: Learning how to respecth REPLY-TO headers
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Learning how to respecth REPLY-TO headers
In-Reply
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
Wietse
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
Sorry about that last transmission.
Your request would
Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
Sorry about that last
On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
your email until you play by the same rules as everyone
23 matches
Mail list logo
