On 3/11/2009 10:44 AM, mme...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yeah i know. It's better to discard the message.
Actually, its best to REJECT the message...
--
Best regards,
Charles
LuKreme escribió:
On 10-Mar-2009, at 18:15, mme...@gmail.com wrote:
when postfix wants to send a bounce message (notifying the
rejected message), my mail system will always try to deliver it
directly to the recipient server (i'm not using a relayhost)... i
think i need to change <> to _r
On 10-Mar-2009, at 18:15, mme...@gmail.com wrote:
when postfix wants to send a bounce message (notifying the rejected
message), my mail system will always try to deliver it directly to
the recipient server (i'm not using a relayhost)... i think i need
to change <> to _real_send...@realdomai
mme...@gmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> Let see how to explain this...
>
> The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my
> rules is to reject a message and notify sender.
Don't do that. By bouncing crap to the sender you are harassing
innocent people about mail that they did not sen
Hi,
Let see how to explain this...
The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my
rules is to reject a message and notify sender, in this step, postfix
uses <> as mail from, this is a normal behavior i think; but in my
scenario where i have one fake domain and using se