Re: changing sender null address...

2009-03-11 Thread Charles Marcus
On 3/11/2009 10:44 AM, mme...@gmail.com wrote: > Yeah i know. It's better to discard the message. Actually, its best to REJECT the message... -- Best regards, Charles

Re: changing sender null address...

2009-03-11 Thread mmelyp
LuKreme escribió: On 10-Mar-2009, at 18:15, mme...@gmail.com wrote: when postfix wants to send a bounce message (notifying the rejected message), my mail system will always try to deliver it directly to the recipient server (i'm not using a relayhost)... i think i need to change <> to _r

Re: changing sender null address...

2009-03-11 Thread LuKreme
On 10-Mar-2009, at 18:15, mme...@gmail.com wrote: when postfix wants to send a bounce message (notifying the rejected message), my mail system will always try to deliver it directly to the recipient server (i'm not using a relayhost)... i think i need to change <> to _real_send...@realdomai

Re: changing sender null address...

2009-03-10 Thread Wietse Venema
mme...@gmail.com: > Hi, > > Let see how to explain this... > > The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my > rules is to reject a message and notify sender. Don't do that. By bouncing crap to the sender you are harassing innocent people about mail that they did not sen

changing sender null address...

2009-03-10 Thread mmelyp
Hi, Let see how to explain this... The issue is that I'm using sieve for my filtering rules, one of my rules is to reject a message and notify sender, in this step, postfix uses <> as mail from, this is a normal behavior i think; but in my scenario where i have one fake domain and using se