On Monday 20 October 2008 13:51:45 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > There are two loop detection mechanisms. You override one with []
> > around the next-hop domain. This mechanism is based on MX lookups.
> > You override the second one with myhostname, or a non-standard TCP
> > server port. This mechanis
Wietse Venema:
> Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
> > On Friday 10 October 2008 15:46:46 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
> > > > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
> > > > > Will the FILTER action accept an empty nexthop?
> > > >
> > > > It seems it does not (
Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Friday 10 October 2008 15:46:46 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
> > > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
> > > > Will the FILTER action accept an empty nexthop?
> > >
> > > I
On Friday 10 October 2008 15:46:46 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
> > On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
> > > Will the FILTER action accept an empty nexthop?
> >
> > It seems it does not (at least not correctly). If the nexthop is empty,
> > it seems to as
Victor Duchovni:
> > example-smtp unix - -n- - smtp
> > -o smtp_bind_address=ip.add.re.ss
> > -o myhostname=example-smtp.example.org
> > example-rewrite unix - -n- - trivial-rewrite
> > -o default_transport=exampl
Янченко Игорь wrote:
Wietse Venema пишет:
Янченко Игорь:
Victor Duchovni ?:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o cleanup_service_name=example-cleanup
-o myhostname=examp
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:57:45PM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
> Wietse Venema ??:
> > ?? ??:
> >> Victor Duchovni ?:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
> >>>
> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n -
Wietse Venema пишет:
> Янченко Игорь:
>> Victor Duchovni ?:
>>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
>>>
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o cleanup_service_name=example-cleanup
-o myhostname=examp
Янченко Игорь a écrit :
> Wietse Venema пишет:
>> Янченко Игорь:
>>> Victor Duchovni ?:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o cleanup_service_name=example-cleanup
?? ??:
> Victor Duchovni ?:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
> >
> >> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
> >> -o cleanup_service_name=example-cleanup
> >> -o myhostname=example-smtp.exa
Victor Duchovni пишет:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
>
>> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
>> -o cleanup_service_name=example-cleanup
>> -o myhostname=example-smtp.example.org
>> -o smtpd_client_res
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:39:58AM +0300, ?? ?? wrote:
> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o cleanup_service_name=example-cleanup
> -o myhostname=example-smtp.example.org
> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=
> -o smtpd_h
Tomasz Chmielewski пишет:
> mouss schrieb:
>> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
>>> Basically, if Postfix can specify the source IP address, that should
>>> be fine for me... provided that it can make some decisions here
>>> (i.e., which outgoing interface to choose, depending on From: or
>>> Received:
Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH):
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
> > Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > The SMTP client's source IP address is controlled with smtp_bind_address,
> > > otherwise it is inherited from inet_interfaces (when this specifies
> > > one non-localhost IP address
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:10 Noel Jones wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The SMTP client's source IP address is controlled with smtp_bind_address,
> > otherwise it is inherited from inet_interfaces (when this specifies
> > one non-localhost IP address).
> >
> > However, making the IP addr
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:32:21AM +0200, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:15 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > It is possible to cause the outgoing transport to depend solely on the
> > incoming IP in some special cases, but this is not something I am inclined
> > t
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:52:15 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> It is possible to cause the outgoing transport to depend solely on the
> incoming IP in some special cases, but this is not something I am inclined
> to recommend to anyone. So I would prefer to pretend it is generally not
> possible, r
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:09:48PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> However, making the IP address dependent on the sender domain is
> not yet implemented. This it requires a sender-dependent transport
> map.
It is possible to cause the outgoing transport to depend solely on the
incoming IP in some
Wietse Venema wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski:
mouss schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Basically, if Postfix can specify the source IP address, that should
be fine for me... provided that it can make some decisions here (i.e.,
which outgoing interface to choose, depending on From: or Received: etc
Tomasz Chmielewski:
> mouss schrieb:
> > Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
> >> Basically, if Postfix can specify the source IP address, that should
> >> be fine for me... provided that it can make some decisions here (i.e.,
> >> which outgoing interface to choose, depending on From: or Received: etc)
mouss wrote:
> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> mouss schrieb:
>>> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>
Basically, if Postfix can specify the source IP address, that should
be fine for me... provided that it can make some decisions here
(i.e., which outgoing interface to choose, depending on Fro
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
mouss schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Basically, if Postfix can specify the source IP address, that should
be fine for me... provided that it can make some decisions here
(i.e., which outgoing interface to choose, depending on From: or
Received: etc).
since
mouss schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Basically, if Postfix can specify the source IP address, that should
be fine for me... provided that it can make some decisions here (i.e.,
which outgoing interface to choose, depending on From: or Received: etc).
since you have one network card,
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:31:40PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one
network card), running Postfix.
The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the
users (foru
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Wietse Venema schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski:
I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one
network card), running Postfix.
The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the users
(forums, automated responses for queries etc.).
I woul
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:31:40PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one network
card), running Postfix.
The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the users
(forums, automated responses for
Wietse Venema schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski:
I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one network
card), running Postfix.
The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the users
(forums, automated responses for queries etc.).
I would like to configure each "w
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:31:40PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one network
> card), running Postfix.
>
> The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the users
> (forums, automated responses for queries etc.).
>
Tomasz Chmielewski:
> I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one network
> card), running Postfix.
>
> The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the users
> (forums, automated responses for queries etc.).
>
> I would like to configure each "website" to se
I have a server with several public IP addresses (aliases on one network
card), running Postfix.
The machine also runs several websites, which interact with the users
(forums, automated responses for queries etc.).
I would like to configure each "website" to send mails via a different
IP add
30 matches
Mail list logo
