On 2018-03-01 05:16, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:49 PM, MRob wrote:
OK thanks Victor a lot. Does that mean I should also remove
smtp_tls_session_cache_database?
NO.
I typoed in my last email (YES/NO), so anyways I think I understand
thanks to your
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:14 AM, MRob <mro...@insiberia.net> wrote:
>
> If I was useing smtpd_tls_session_cache_database does it disable session
> tickets?
No, but it wastes space on the server, caching sessions the client is unlikely
to use.
> BTW, are smtpd session ticke
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:49 PM, MRob wrote:
>
> OK thanks Victor a lot. Does that mean I should also remove
> smtp_tls_session_cache_database?
NO.
--
Viktor.
On 2018-03-01 04:49, MRob wrote:
On 2018-03-01 04:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob <mro...@insiberia.net> wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
an
On 2018-03-01 04:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob <mro...@insiberia.net> wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
You're
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob <mro...@insiberia.net> wrote:
>
> I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you shouldn't
> set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see anything in the docs
> now.
You're better of without it, becau
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
Reading docs still it seems smtpd_tls_session_cache_database can be
useful. What is behavior when its empty(default)?
On 8/12/2010 9:50 AM, Clayton Keller wrote:
I've been reading up on the use of the value and have notice a
few different pieces of information that contradict each other
and was hoping to get some possible clarification/insight from
the list.
The postconf(5) page and TLS_README file indicate:
LuKreme a écrit :
[snip]
Figured that out right after sending last. Everything works in postfix
right now as it is. I am only able to auth against the salsdb with
$ cat smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: auxprop
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN
Any changes I've tried to make to that file so far have
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:27:37PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:$data_directory/smtpd_sessions
postfix/smtpd[67779]: fatal: open database /var/db/postfix/
smtpd_sessions.db: No such file or directory
smtpd never uses
On 15-Mar-2009, at 14:25, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:27:37PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:$data_directory/
smtpd_sessions
postfix/smtpd[67779]: fatal: open database /var/db/postfix/
smtpd_sessions.db: No such file or directory
LuKreme a écrit :
I can connect now to the submission port from my MUA (mail.app) as long
as I authenticate against the sasldb. I cannot connect from the
command-line with openssl s_client:
no you can't. which is why Noel added connectivity to his
recommendation. only use openssl to see what
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 03:32:26PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
$ openssl s_client -connect mail.covisp.net:587
CONNECTED(0003)
4001:error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown
protocol:s23_clnt.c:601:
This is SMTP inside SSL, Postfix does STARTTLS inside SMTP, so this
is not
On 15-Mar-2009, at 17:08, mouss wrote:
LuKreme a écrit :
I can connect now to the submission port from my MUA (mail.app) as
long
as I authenticate against the sasldb. I cannot connect from the
command-line with openssl s_client:
no you can't. which is why Noel added connectivity to his
In reading http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html and all the posts
in the last 15 months with 'smtpd_tls_session_cache_database' in the
subject (all 7 of them!), it is not clear to me how the
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database file is created, or what exactly it
contains. If the file
LuKreme:
In reading http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html and all the posts
in the last 15 months with 'smtpd_tls_session_cache_database' in the
subject (all 7 of them!), it is not clear to me how the
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database file is created, or what exactly it
contains
Dave a écrit :
The cache file previously listed (/var/run/smtpd_tls_session_cache) is
not present. I didn't delete it. Maybe postfix did?
no. the file has a .db sufix.
BTW, an answer as simple as use rm is helpful because (I'm told) there
are certain files that should not be deleted
which of these lines is more correct? I'm guessing the 2nd line is better.
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtpd_tls_session_cache
or
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
same question here:
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:55:43AM -0800, MountainX wrote:
which of these lines is more correct? I'm guessing the 2nd line is better.
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtpd_tls_session_cache
or
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
MountainX wrote:
which of these lines is more correct? I'm guessing the 2nd line is better.
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtpd_tls_session_cache
or
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
same question here
MountainX wrote:
which of these lines is more correct? I'm guessing the 2nd line is better.
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/run/smtpd_tls_session_cache
or
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
same question here
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:01 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
MountainX a écrit :
MountainX wrote:
which of these lines is more correct? I'm guessing the 2nd line is
better.
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database =
btree:/var/run/smtpd_tls_session_cache
22 matches
Mail list logo