Message-
From: Terry Barnum [mailto:te...@dop.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 8:04 PM
To: Marius Gologan
Cc: postfix users
Subject: Re: spam fighting
On Apr 28, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Marius Gologan marius.golo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Terry,
I use amavisd-new/spamassassin in post
users
Subject: spam fighting
We've been using postscreen and dspam for quite some time but in the past
couple months more spam is making it through. I realize there's no
one-size-fits-all approach but because dspam isn't actively developed
anymore I've started looking around and am curious
to manually block or whitelist
certain Domains, IPs and Name Servers (mostly private).
-Original Message-
From: Terry Barnum [mailto:te...@dop.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:08 PM
To: Marius Gologan
Cc: postfix users
Subject: Re: spam fighting
On Apr 28, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Marius Gologan
, 2015 1:15 AM
To: postfix users
Subject: spam fighting
We've been using postscreen and dspam for quite some time but in the past
couple months more spam is making it through. I realize there's no
one-size-fits-all approach but because dspam isn't actively developed
anymore I've started looking around
in reducing
spam load are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Terry
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Terry Barnum
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 1:15 AM
To: postfix users
Subject: spam fighting
We've
-15k messages a
day.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Barnum [mailto:te...@dop.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 8:04 PM
To: Marius Gologan
Cc: postfix users
Subject: Re: spam fighting
On Apr 28, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Marius Gologan marius.golo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Terry,
I use
attack from those IP pools.
-Original Message-
From: Marius Gologan [mailto:marius.golo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 10:34 PM
To: 'Terry Barnum'
Cc: 'postfix users'
Subject: RE: spam fighting
Shared DNS as Google's 8.8.8.8 is not accepted by some RBLs such as
spamhaus
We've been using postscreen and dspam for quite some time but in the past
couple months more spam is making it through. I realize there's no
one-size-fits-all approach but because dspam isn't actively developed anymore
I've started looking around and am curious what others are using. Is
Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Sat, October 4, 2008 1:03 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's STILL smtp rejection - he was thinking of using it from e.g.
SpamAssassin. But I personally think that dsn.rfc-ignorant.org is safe
for smtp rejection :)
thanks, Ralf
(after all, it was your suggestion
Hello All,
I just updated my rbl list since dsbl.org is out and wanted to see if anyone
has any new lists that are conservative enough to use in the war against
spam.
I use in this order the following:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
Joey schrieb:
I use in this order the following:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
for us bl.spamcop.net has produced quite a lot false positives in the
past, that's why we only use it for scoring, but things may have changed.
Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Fri, October 3, 2008 11:07 pm, Udo Rader wrote:
Joey schrieb:
I use in this order the following:
we use these:
blocked using bl.spamcop.net (total: 491)
blocked using combined.njabl.org (total: 77)
blocked using dsn.rfc-ignorant.org (total: 368)
rfci
On Fri, October 3, 2008 11:36 pm, mouss wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
rfci is not safe for smtp rejection. It is not intended for such use.
mouss, thanks
so, should be like this ?
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
blocked using dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
* Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rfci is not safe for smtp rejection. It is not intended for such use.
mouss, thanks
so, should be like this ?
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
That's STILL smtp rejection - he was thinking of using it from e.g.
* Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rfci is not safe for smtp rejection. It is not intended for such use.
mouss, thanks
so, should be like this ?
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
That's STILL smtp rejection - he was thinking of using it
* Joey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's STILL smtp rejection - he was thinking of using it from e.g.
SpamAssassin. But I personally think that dsn.rfc-ignorant.org is safe
for smtp rejection :)
We had a lot of problems when we used rfc-ignorant.org because of Exchange
servers not being
On Sat, October 4, 2008 1:03 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
That's STILL smtp rejection - he was thinking of using it from e.g.
SpamAssassin. But I personally think that dsn.rfc-ignorant.org is safe
for smtp rejection :)
thanks, Ralf
(after all, it was your suggestion from
17 matches
Mail list logo
