Till,
Upgrade to 1.3.5 at least. There were massive memory leaks in comes
cases of point-in-polygon tests in the early 1.3 series.
P
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Till Kirchner
till.kirch...@vti.bund.de wrote:
Hi together,
I have a memory problem when executing a Point-In-Polygon function.
There is code for this in the lwspheroid.c file in liblwgeom. Note it
is GPL. It's not exposed in SQL at the moment, I didn't realize people
would have that use case. So file a ticket to make azimuth/bearing
translations on the spheroid available in SQL.
P
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Luke
Try this:
SELECT name, the_geom,
ST_AsText(the_geom),ST_GeomFromText(ST_AsText(the_geom),ST_SRID(the_geom)) FROM
nyc_subway_stations WHERE name = 'Broad St';
The trouble is that ST_AsText drops the SRID information, so when you
convert that back into a binary geometry, it has a different
And that DBF field dates from the Time Before UTF-8, so there won't be
a UTF8 number to put in it, in any event. DBF files with UTF in
them (OSM!) are scary scary scary (for example, should your code for
reading a CHAR(8) field in DBF expect 8 bytes, or 8 characters? yay!)
It would be nice to
.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org wrote:
And that DBF field dates from the Time Before UTF-8, so there won't be
a UTF8 number to put in it, in any event. DBF files with UTF in
them (OSM!) are scary scary scary (for example, should your code for
reading a CHAR(8
And there is a more recent tutorial available here:
http://workshops.opengeo.org/postgis-intro/
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:00 AM, MarkW mark.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
Nitesh,
(There is a good tutorial about mapserver here:
http://mapserver.org/tutorial/index.html )
As for the PostGIS part, it's
...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:22 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] shape to postgis inporter fails or crashes
Just use the -w switch to specify WINDOWS-1252 as your encoding.
Should work fine from there.
P.
BTW
There's no such thing as a PostGIS SRID, the SRID only has true
meaning local to a database instance. Now, because we happen to
install a spatial_ref_sys.sql file which not only has SRID values but
makes them identical to the EPSG numbers, there is an assumption that
the SRID == EPSG number, but
Interesting paper:
http://dke.cti.gr/pubs/confs/adbis02.pdf
P
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
You could use ST_Dump() to split your multipolygon up and then run
validity check/fix on the individual components...?
P
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:44 AM, L Bogert-OBrien dlaw...@ncf.ca wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is a way to minimize the extent on which
the cleangeometry()
If this isn't a ticket for qgis, it should be. They should be able to do
readonly access to tables and views that do not have unique keys, no excuses.
P.
On 2010-08-18, at 10:51 AM, William Furnass w...@thearete.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
QGIS requires that all PostGIS tables/views have a numeric
It should be, our spatial_ref_sys is generated from gdal which
generates from epsg. You have a pretty recent postgis, so I'm
surprised it's missing.
P
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Erik Rehn e...@slagkryssaren.com wrote:
Thank you guys! You were right, I had flipped the coordinates in the
Aman,
Thanks for the informative post. Could you put the relevant parts and
your example file into the issue tracker at
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis
so we have a record of it? I can see the benefit in handling data in
the way others do for maximum ease of use.
Yours,
Paul
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010
the overhead of the create table as
... approach, though I am not smart enough to tell you why.
Kevin has many experiences and useful tips on handling really large tables.
P.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Mauricio Miranda
mmira...@xoomcode.com wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 15:56 PM, Paul Ramsey
Seems to be an underlying problem with proj4:
echo 59 21 | proj +init=epsg:3021 | invproj +init=epsg:3021
58d49'47.733E 21d2'54.745N
And that's without doing the datum shift part.
P
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Erik Rehn e...@slagkryssaren.com wrote:
Hello Postgis Users!
This is my
58d49'47.733E 21d2'54.745N
P.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org wrote:
Seems to be an underlying problem with proj4:
echo 59 21 | proj +init=epsg:3021 | invproj +init=epsg:3021
58d49'47.733E 21d2'54.745N
And that's without doing the datum shift part.
P
Indeed, the code is there, it just needs to be exposed to SQL. Do you
build your own PostGIS Francis? If so you can open a ticket for the
feature and I'll provide a patch there you can apply. If not, it could
be a long wait for PostGIS 2.0 and new features. (several months)
P
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010
Add a +to_meter parameter to your proj4 definition, that might nail
it. I'm not sure specifying +units actually does any math.
P
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:48 AM, robert_cl...@doh.state.fl.us wrote:
Good afternoon all:
I'm working on a project in which I feed parameters to our intern for
Chris,
The advice from the manual stands... Your best bet will be to chop up your big
polygons into smaller regions. My personal preference is to use a grid for the
chopping. You can then test fir containment by checking to see that all the
fragments your test polygon intersects share the
Not sure if I mentioned this earlier, but in case I failed to:
http://www.osgeo.org/node/1057
--
The Open Source Geospatial Foundation would like to open nominations
for the 2010 Sol Katz Award for Geospatial Free and Open Source
Software.
The Sol Katz Award for Geospatial Free and Open Source
It's still on an experimental branch... but who knows, maybe someone
has a big production deployment :) people are strange (like the
folks who deployed PostGIS 0.1 in Solothurn, right Horst?)
You might want to at least try it and see... the two days you invest
in research are probably well worth
Are you using 1.4? The pip shortcuts all got into that release series...
P.
On 2010-07-22, at 1:17 PM, Dan Putler dan.put...@sauder.ubc.ca wrote:
Hi Tim,
A point-in-polygon test approach would seem to make sense. I did a quick
Google search and ran into posting on Paul Ramsey's Clever
, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Stefan Priess stefan.pri...@iav.de wrote:
Hey Paul,
i need the ST_Expand() function with a radius/expand of 10 Meters, how i will
do that?
The Point to expand is in SRID 4326 .
Thanks
Stefan
Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org
Gesendet von: postgis-users-boun
There is no recommended way right now. It's a core development
activity I'd love to have funded... :)
http://opengeo.org/products/coredevelopment/postgis/pointclouds/
In the meanwhile a approach might be to put the x/y/z into a postgis
geometry and stuff the rest of the data into an array of
array query language on top. See www.rasdaman.org.
-Peter
Paul Ramsey wrote:
Oh, actually one-row-per-point is a bad idea, because the size of
lidar sets mitigates against that. Putting them into multipoint
collections of 50 or 100 points is better. But that implies
preprocessing things
David,
Consider using the GEOGRAPHY type if your queries are just going to be
ST_DWithin style. That will remove all projection issues.
P.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:19 AM, David Jantzen djant...@ql2.com wrote:
Hey All,
It's been a couple years but happily I have a reason to work with PostGIS
.com wrote:
Sweet! It must do on-the-fly projections under the covers, right? That's a
huge improvement since I used PostGIS last time.
On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
David,
Consider using the GEOGRAPHY type if your queries are just going to be
ST_DWithin style
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org wrote:
ST_Buffer(geography, float8) returns geography
ST_Intersection(geography, geography) returns geography
These last two actually *do* carry out projections under the covers,
so watch out.
P
acknowledge the work of
community members, and pay tribute to one of its founders, for years
to come.
It should be noted that past awardees and selection committee members
are not eligible.
Past Awardees:
2009: Daniel Morissette
2008: Paul Ramsey
2007: Steve Lime
2006: Markus Neteler
2005: Frank
GeoHash doesn't cut it? It's space partitioned, just not as balanced
as a kd-tree, but for points... no? I'll look up my info on the GiST
work that was done, but note that it didn't make it into 9.0, but into
9.1, and as I recall Oleg and co did not seem to think the kd
implementation was going to
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Greg Militello j...@thinkof.net wrote:
Why isn't this possible?
CREATE TABLE parks (
park_id INTEGER,
park_name VARCHAR,
park_date DATE,
park_type VARCHAR,
parks GEOMETRY(128, 'MULTIPOLYGON', 2)
);
Until recently (pgsql 8.3), PostgreSQL
OS/X includes it's own iconv, and somehow you're getting a conflict
based on the software you've installed. It looks like you've compiled
against GNU libiconv (hence 'libiconv_open') but are linking against
OSX iconv (which uses plain 'iconv_open').
Hope that helps you track things. Watch what
João Paulo,
If you could provide the shapefile in question (or, even better, a
reduced version with just the one polygon that causes trouble) that
would make it easier for us to fix things up!
Thanks
P
2010/6/22 João Paulo Hespanha jphespa...@gmx.com:
Dear Sirs:
While importing a shapefile
(a) ensure you have the gtk libs and devel support packages installed
(gtk+-dev) including pkg-config
(b) ./configure including the --with-gui directive
P
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Bruno Friedmann br...@ioda-net.ch wrote:
Hi Regina, may I ask a question about building this under linux ?
If you plan to come to Barcelona, Spain for the Free and Open Source
Software for Geospatial conference in Semptember this year, then you
best register right now, as early bird registration ends this Tuesday
15 June 2010.
http://2010.foss4g.org/registration.php
FOSS4G is the international Free
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Paragon Corporation l...@pcorp.us wrote:
On that thought. Remember how geometry intersects performance significantly
increased with prepared geometry algorithm, are we using that same kind of
prepared geometry logic for geography.
No, we are not. The
...@refractions.net wrote:
Perhaps it could use an in-memory bounding prism index? You're using a
disk-based one used for geography types, right?
Paul Ramsey wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Paragon Corporation l...@pcorp.us wrote:
On that thought. Remember how geometry intersects performance
Actually it's slower because the calculations require lots of
transcendental math. Anyhow, it's slower. If anyone wants a quote on
speed improvements, I'm happy to provide one, I have some good ideas
about how to speed things up with some better data structures and
caching.
P.
On Mon, May 31,
for intersecting 150k polygons is not stellar given how we've
been spoiled with geometries in the past.
Anyway, maybe a warning is in order for people considering moving
across what do you think?
On 1 June 2010 07:00, Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org wrote:
Actually it's slower because
Sounds like all calls to st_isvalid fail, yes? As you can imagine,
this is not behaviour we see on other platforms. I wonder if anyone
else on Win2008 Server using the EBD distribution see a similar thing?
P
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Colin East
colin.e...@geospatial-ict.com.au wrote:
Run
ldd /usr/local/pgsql/lib/postgis-1.5.so
And see what it says...
BTW, you shouldn't install PostGIS into template1 unless you want all
your databases to be PostGIS enabled. A better practice is to make a
template_postgis database and install into that.
Paul
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:06
Yes, after installing a new library, run ldconfig as root. This
informs the linker to check for new libraries (in the directories
listed in /etc/ld.so.conf)
P
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Kai Behncke kai-behn...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi you
I bet on missing ldconfig after libproj install.
/postgis-1.5.so: undefined symbol: GEOSHausdorffDistance
--
That is really weird??
Best regards, Kai
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:39:10 -0400
Von: Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org
An: PostGIS Users Discussion postgis-users
You should file a ticket on it... I think if you create a function
geography(bytea) that just call the ST_GeogFromWKB() function that
should get around your casting problem.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION geography(bytea)
RETURNS geography
AS 'SELECT ST_GeogFromWKB($1)'
3857 is a Mercator projection. Your coordinates are geographics. If
you mis-declare your SRS (as, in your case, declaring that geographics
are mercators) then transform will spit out funny numbers on the basis
of that initial mistake.
P
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Ronald Phillips
While the underlying map tiles in GMaps are mercator, the actual API
only talks to you in geographics. This causes many people, including
you, confusion. Either of the form of the map is in lat lon (it's
not) or, in your case the coordinates I'm working with are in the
Google projection (they
ST_NDims() returns the number of dimensions, but that doesn't
distinguish between XYM and XYZ.
The ESRI compatibility functions SE_IsMeasured() and SE_Is3D() (hey,
they are useful after all!) return the information you are looking
for.
P
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, 孙琦 qsu...@gmail.com
If you have an older version of PostGIS, the zmflag() function also
returns the information you need.
P
2010/5/19 Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org:
ST_NDims() returns the number of dimensions, but that doesn't
distinguish between XYM and XYZ.
The ESRI compatibility functions SE_IsMeasured
No, it's still around.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:25 AM, strk s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:43:03AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
If you have an older version of PostGIS, the zmflag() function also
returns the information you need.
Which was even more useful as you could get
Those are the correct answers...
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Charles Galpin cgal...@lhsw.com wrote:
Steve, I get the same results on 1.4 and 1.5 (but they differ from yours)
On 1.4
PostgreSQL 8.4.2, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400, 32-bit
POSTGIS=1.4.1 GEOS=3.2.0-CAPI-1.6.0
Bad sentence construction in the error, perhaps? The restriction only
polygon and point means that one argument must be a polygon and one
must be a point. Both your arguments are polygons.
P.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Nicholas Bower n...@petangent.net wrote:
I've read the 1.5 reference
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Nicholas Bower n...@petangent.net wrote:
On 12 May 2010 08:14, Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org wrote:
The doc example appears to not mention the limitation in the geography
implementation, which can be fixed. The example is correct, insofar
as it is against
cushioned as you would expect. Maybe it's just a
compromise we have to live with for not returning views of New Zealand in
searches of the Indian Ocean. ;-)
On 12 May 2010 10:08, Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Nicholas Bower n...@petangent.net
wrote
No, seems to compile and install perfectly fine under OS/X.
Two regression failures (*sigh*) due to a slight change in output from
SQL (select queries that don't return rows now return 'SELECT number
of rows' instead of just 'SELECT')
P.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Joel Pearson
Even-yet-random :) nice requirement. How about just starting with a
regular grid and then perturbing the elements randomly with a radius
of a cell size? You can use the area of the polygon and number of
needed points to calculate the appropriate cell size and go from
there.
P
On Thu, May 6, 2010
It's that time of year again! The Community Program Review for FOSS4G has begun!
http://2010.foss4g.org/review/
If you're going to FOSS4G, or seriously thinking about going, the
review is a way to ensure that the program includes topics you are
interested in. You scroll through a list of all the
version: 2.6.16
PostGIS debug level: 0
Documentation Generation
xsltproc: /usr/bin/xsltproc
xsl style sheets:
dblatex:
convert:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:46:44 -0700, Paul Ramsey
pram...@cleverelephant.ca
wrote:
What happens when you run 'touch
(first use in this
function)
g_box.c:596: error: 'COLLECTIONTYPE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
g_box.c:597: error: 'LWCOLLECTION' undeclared (first use in this function)
g_box.c:597: error: syntax error before ')' token
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:43:34 -0700, Paul Ramsey
pram
Since you're compiling from source, get it straight from the
elephant's mouth: postgis.org
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, John Connors jconn...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Ok. That's what I thought. I downloaded the source from KyngChaos.
-John
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:50:45 -0700, Paul Ramsey
pram
What happens when you run 'touch test'?
P
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:33 PM, John Connors jconn...@berkeley.edu wrote:
I am trying to build the PostGIS 1.5 files in Mac OSX and I am getting the
following error:
make -C liblwgeom
gcc -g -O2 -fno-common -DPIC -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -c -o
They don't, at least for me:
postgis14=# select st_length_spheroid(GeomFromText('LINESTRING(0 0,180
0)',4326),'SPHEROID[WGS 84,6378137,298.257223563]')
;
st_length_spheroid
20037508.3427892
(1 row)
postgis14=# select
If you change the 180 to 179 do the results match up again? (ie, do
any distance less than a perfect half-sphere?)
P
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Olivier Courtin
olivier.cour...@oslandia.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
They don't, at least for me:
postgis14
, at 6:54 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
If you change the 180 to 179 do the results match up again? (ie, do
any distance less than a perfect half-sphere?)
Yes, right assertion.
Values are the same below 180
--
Olivier
___
postgis-users mailing list
Explication http://a.mongers.org/clueful/20020402-peopleware-blackteam
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Paul Ramsey pram...@cleverelephant.ca wrote:
You're such a Black Team member, Regina :)
I think the geography spheroid calculation falls back to a sphere
calculation if it is handed the 180
Dunno if you have control over it, but the -xc99=none flag is
worrisome if it means no c99 since postgis does in fact include a
number of c99 constructs.
P
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Teresa Fazio fa...@planetek.it wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install postgis 1.5.1 on a Solaris Sparc 64 bit,
Nicholas,
Could you confirm that the crash is building an index on a *geography*
column, not a *geometry* column? Ie, the problem has not been
introduced to old geometry code, it's something in the new geography
code.
After that I'm going to need the data that causes the error...
Paul
On Thu, Apr
-
From: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:59 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Conversion from undefined geometry to
geography?
Just use
Yes, the numbers will probably be slightly different as the floating
point calcs will come out slightly different. And the WKT encodes
slightly less precision than the WKB, so it's visible in the latter
and not the former.
P
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Tobias Sauerwein
Just use geography(the_geom), it'll work fine. If you fine you have
srid issues (I don't think you should) use
geography(setsrid(the_geom,4326))
P
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Nicholas Bower n...@petangent.net wrote:
We have some tables in which we've used Geometry to store polygon and
Does apt have a search function? Probably the proj packagers broke the
grid files out into a different proj-something package?
P
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Bryan Keith br...@ideotrope.org wrote:
Something is definitely strange with the PROJ.4 installation on that
one system. If I had
It's probably a function of your installation, I get the same results
as cs2cs on my PostGIS;
postgis15=# select astext(transform(setsrid(makepoint(1234488,
744181), 32003), 32100));
astext
--
POINT(366704.349230461 199132.534090009)
(1
:43 PM
To: Paul Ramsey
Cc: PostGIS Users Discussion; Paragon Corporation
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] ERROR: array size exceeds
themaximumallowed(134217727)
Ok,
I've attached the smallest version of this query I can make before the
error goes away. It seems to be very particular
Mike,
See if this patch makes anything better. It matches tlane's changes to
the 8.4 agg finalfunc.
P.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Paul Ramsey pram...@cleverelephant.ca
wrote:
Did you already try replacing your postgis
This looks like a winner, at least insofar as it removes the max array
error condition for me in OS/X. Huge thanks to Greg Stark for digging
up the references to Tom Lane's changes in the array agg stuff...
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Paul Ramsey pram...@cleverelephant.ca wrote:
Mike,
See
-
From: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 8:23 PM
To: mgle...@alumni.uwaterloo.ca; PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] ERROR: array size exceeds
of the statement, are
you able to get a segfault?
Mike
On Sunday 21 March 2010 12:57:03 Paul Ramsey wrote:
As I was installing KUbuntu, I realized I should try the query on my
own system, and under OS/X 10.6 I see the array error, though it seems
to be cleanly trapped, there is no segfault.
crashdb
Actually, memunion does the opposite, it passes the resultant and
preserves mem. The default behavior is fast-but-memory-hungry. And has
been for some time, though in different forms. There were some bugs in
the array handling code, but Mark CA killed most of them, so the
latest 1.5 and 1.4
-Original Message-
From: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
Paul Ramsey
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 10:56 AM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion; mgle...@alumni.uwaterloo.ca
Subject: Re: [postgis-users
Yes, there's patches to our shapelib that don't exist in the mainline.
The process needs to identify our changes to feed back to mainline,
update mainline, then bring that in.
P.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Peter Hopfgartner
peter.hopfgart...@r3-gis.com wrote:
Paul Ramsey wrote:
I
From the Committee:
--
We are pleased to announce that the deadline for Abstract submissions
(General and Academic Sessions) has been postponed to April 15th,
2010.
== General Sessions ==
FOSS4G presentations are 25 minute talks, with a 5 minute question and
: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 6:25 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] PostGIS/PostGres Configuration
Don't need to... run this command
Very reasonable... ticket that as an enhancement please!
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis
p
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Jerry Carter je...@jerrycarter.org wrote:
Thanks. I've already started down that path.
The real issue in my mind is the error text. If GEOS throws an error,
couldn't
: (250) 381-9295
Cell: (250) 516-2481
-Original Message-
From: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:38 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis
Services Coordinator, ICIS
www.icisociety.ca
Office: (250) 381-9295
Cell: (250) 516-2481
-Original Message-
From: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 5:31 PM
.
Steffan Chmuryk
Technical Services Coordinator, ICIS
www.icisociety.ca
Office: (250) 381-9295
Cell: (250) 516-2481
-Original Message-
From: postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent
Put your files in a dropbox folder.
http://dropbox.com
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Wenbert Del Rosario wenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am new comer to the GIS world. I hope you will be able to help me with my
problem.
But first, I have some questions:
Will ArcMap work directly with
What does from base repositories mean? If you compiled from source,
and you had proj-devel installed, it would pick up your system proj
library. Perhaps you haven't installed proj-devel?
P
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Pedro Monteiro
monteiro.s.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I've installed
not compiled it from source, Postgis it's working except functions
related to proj.I
've been checking my installation and postgis was installed via yum from
EPEL repositories and proj from centos base repositories.
Pedro
2010/3/15 Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org
What does from base
Steffan,
Leave your localhost entry in place, it's useful. Make a copy of the
line and edit the copy.
Change localhost to 192.168.0.0 and change 32 to 16.
Ensure that listen_addresses = '*' in your postgresql.conf file.
Restart the database
Try again.
P
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Steffan
] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:15 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] PostGIS/PostGres Configuration
Steffan,
Leave your localhost entry in place, it's useful. Make a copy of the
line and edit the copy.
Change localhost to 192.168.0.0
Paolo,
Put the shapefile somewhere I can pull it and I'll see if I can
replicate. You haven't specified your PostGIS version, which is
important.
P
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
Hi all.
While importing a shapefile into postgis, I see that the
That appears to have fixed things on OS/X. Can you port back into 1.5 branch?
P
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Sandro Santilli(strk) s...@keybit.net wrote:
I found memory errors in the loader, and fixed in trunk
with commit 5430.
Please test again with the new version.
--strk;
()
It looks to me like ST_AsSVG doesn't very carefully handle empty
geometry inputs, so you're getting a non-terminated string back.
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/463
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Vyron Antoniou v.anton...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
Check this out:
select assvg(difference(
Patch releases of the 1.5 and 1.4 PostGIS series are now available!
http://postgis.org/download
Fixes in 1.5.1:
* #333, remove unnecessary VACUUM from install file (Kevin Neufeld)
* #410, update embedded bbox when applying ST_SetPoint, ST_AddPoint
ST_RemovePoint to a linestring (Paul Ramsey
Wrong PostgreSQL version? We only support 8.3+ on PostGIS 1.5.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Sachin Srivastava
sachin.srivastava1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am building postgis-1.5.0 with proj-4.7.0, geos-3.2.0, libxml2-2.7.6,
postgresql-9.0alpha4 on Windows7 (MinGW)
lwgeom_accum.c:
:
9.0alpha4 is 8.3+ or i am missing something??
On 3/10/10 8:44 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
Wrong PostgreSQL version? We only support 8.3+ on PostGIS 1.5.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Sachin Srivastava
sachin.srivastava1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am building postgis-1.5.0 with proj-4.7.0
OK, patched in the 1.5 branch
http://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/branches/1.5
another release to push 1.5.1 out...
P
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Paul Ramsey pram...@opengeo.org wrote:
No, it was me missing something. Perhaps something has changed since
our last compatibility patch
Does
select ST_AsSVG('GEOMETRYCOLLECTION EMPTY'::geometry,0,5);
give the same odd result? (Should, it's the same fundamental input...)
I'm not sure what you're seeing though, as all attempts in the
database to find anything odd in the input fail for me:
geog=# select
All notices, non-harmful. We recognize that this amount of noise is
probably counter-productive...
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/415
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:14 PM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded to Postgis 1.5.0, but in the process, encountered the
following
I was never certain that ESRI software actually respected the DBF code
page flags, but your reference indicates they do, so this seems
reasonable. Some investigation of the current state of shapelib WRT
encoding would be wise, as I think we should update our shapelib to
the current version when we
201 - 300 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
