On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>>Yes, but this was causing lots of issues, as I'm sure you remember.
>
> Actually not - apart from my commiting changes in insufficient
> granularity. Happy to take your word for it, though.
A few other things spring instantly to mind - an i
#3989: Wrong data entered for agricultural field
-+--
Reporter: HillWithSmallFields | Owner: potlatch-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: m
Ok, I'm just going to rebut everything because I'm in that sort of mood.
>P2 has a strong sense of design
>and authorship, as do JOSM and osm.org itself. We don't accept any and
>every patch - that way would lie chaos.
It would be good if the mechanism by which this happens were a little
more tra
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
> Yes, but this was causing lots of issues, as I'm sure you remember.
> Think of it instead as being a much more relaxing way of developing -
> you can make your changes public without needing to worry about
> stepping on anyone's toes - I can (a
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
>>If there's any gotchas let me know.
> Ok, since you asked:
>
> "First you need to get a copy of the potlatch2 repository from
> somewhere. It doesn't really matter where it comes from..."
On 31/08/2011 10:46, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
If there's any gotchas let me know.
Ok, since you asked:
"First you need to get a copy of the potlatch2 repository from
somewhere. It doesn't really matter where it comes from..."
...
"There's many di
On 31/08/11 10:46, Steve Bennett wrote:
I find this bit of using git somewhat deflating. With SVN, I was able
to commit my changes into "the" repository. Although the changes
weren't immediately in the production release (fortunately), other
developers would immediately see them next time they d
Steve Bennett wrote:
> I find this bit of using git somewhat deflating. With SVN, I was able
> to commit my changes into "the" repository. Although the changes
> weren't immediately in the production release (fortunately), other
> developers would immediately see them next time they did an update.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
>If there's any gotchas let me know.
Ok, since you asked:
"First you need to get a copy of the potlatch2 repository from
somewhere. It doesn't really matter where it comes from..."
...
"There's many different ways to share your changes with the r
