RE: [Pound Mailing List] Follow-Up to help with Pound, Web browsers and Certificates

2017-08-01 Thread Warren Perdue
Than k you D, I will try that next. -Original Message- From: D. Hampton Finger [mailto:loc...@austin.utexas.edu] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 10:35 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Follow-Up to help with Pound, Web browsers and Certificates I Have had this issue

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Follow-Up to help with Pound, Web browsers and Certificates

2017-08-01 Thread Warren Perdue
Than k you D, I will try that next. -Original Message- From: D. Hampton Finger [mailto:loc...@austin.utexas.edu] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 10:35 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] Follow-Up to help with Pound, Web browsers and Certificates I Have had this issue

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Follow-Up to help with Pound, Web browsers and Certificates

2017-08-01 Thread D. Hampton Finger
I Have had this issue over several refreshes, and finally just broke it out into a more manageable setup. Cert"/etc/pki/tls/certs/quest-pound.pem" VerifyList "/etc/pki/tls/certs/incommon_interm.pem" CAlist "/etc/pki/tls/certs/incommon_interm.pem" I am running 2.6 and keep the ce

RE: [Pound Mailing List] Follow-Up to help with Pound, Web browsers and Certificates

2017-08-01 Thread Warren Perdue
*** UPDATE ** Hey guys, I need your help. I am trying to create a Cert Directive for my server and no matter what I try I cannot get the sequence right. Do you all know the order in which I have to place the keys and certs being private, intermediate, chain and server? I have: ca.key.pem ca.c

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Delay in Request Running over pound

2017-08-01 Thread Emilio Campos
Dear Stefan, José Pablo pasted in this thread a direct link to a git with the patch https://github.com/zevenet/pound/commit/dcbbff5b7514c267b8a9caa5c336479a99cce8d4 This patch adds a new Global Directive called: Ignore100continue Described in the pound manual as follows: Ignore100continue: Ign

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Delay in Request Running over pound

2017-08-01 Thread Stefan Bauer
Hello Emilio. Thanks for the reply. Might you be so kind an provide me some details regarding your solution. A first search in github does not give me any results. I found two patches regarding the issue (one for 2.6 and one for 2.8a). Tried to use the 2.8a one, but that patch did not apply corre

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Delay in Request Running over pound

2017-08-01 Thread José Pablo García Liébana
Hi all, If you are interested in supporting 100-continue header, there is a patch available here: https://github.com/zevenet/pound/commit/dcbbff5b7514c267b8a9caa5c336479a99cce8d4 Regards Jose Jose Pablo GarciaDevelopment and Support Departmentwww.zevenet.com

Re: [Pound Mailing List] Delay in Request Running over pound

2017-08-01 Thread Emilio Campos
We had a similar issue with an app of a vendor, the 100 continue header in the backend was mandatory and we solved this after to support 100continue from Pound. You can find some pound fork in github including this patch, if needed. Joe and Robert, I think that supporting 100continue header would

Re: [Pound Mailing List] large peaks of connect_nb

2017-08-01 Thread Emilio Campos
THis log message is related with the backend check Alive directive, it tries to do a tcp connection every "Alive" seconds in order to check if the backend is resurrected, If you have several pounds running or several services in the same pound you are not able to detect what backend is being checke