Wayne Brissette / 04.3.12 / 1:44 PM wrote:
>Threading is more complicated than that. It's the ability to maintain the
>relationship of the message to another. Usually this consist of being
>able to track using Message-Id, References, and In-Reply-To headers.
There is also a drawback on Message-I
Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Friday, March 12, 2004 stated:
>On 12 3 2004 at 1:17 pm -0500, Richard Hart wrote:
>
>>I would like to send a message to a group of people but not have anyone
>>on the list see the name of anyone else on the list.
>
>Add everybody as Bcc: recipients, and provide n
Richard Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Friday, March 12, 2004 stated:
>Barbara Needham wrote:
>
>>It would be great if some sort of message threading
>>were to be included in the new PM.
>
>Sorry if I'm misinterpreting what you need, but sorting by Subject
>displays threads for me. It should for you
Richard Hart / 04.3.12 / 1:17 PM wrote:
>I would like to send a message to a group of people but not have anyone
>on the list see the name of anyone else on the list.
>
>I cannot find a way to address undisclosed recipients in the PowerMail
manual.
Would BCC work for your purpose?
--
- Hiro
On 12 3 2004 at 1:17 pm -0500, Richard Hart wrote:
>I would like to send a message to a group of people but not have anyone
>on the list see the name of anyone else on the list.
Add everybody as Bcc: recipients, and provide no To: nor Cc: recipients.
-ben
--
Ben Kennedy, chief magician
zygoat
I would like to send a message to a group of people but not have anyone
on the list see the name of anyone else on the list.
I cannot find a way to address undisclosed recipients in the PowerMail manual.
Richard Hart
Barbara Needham wrote:
>It would be great if some sort of message threading
>were to be included in the new PM.
Sorry if I'm misinterpreting what you need, but sorting by Subject
displays threads for me. It should for you too.
RH
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Maybe, but why? If you don't have BBEdit just use the script for
TextEdit. Fundamentally I wouldn't write this script for Word either,
it's overkill. Why use AppleWorks when TextEdit is all you really need?
--
Andy Fragen
It would be great if some sort of message threading were to be included
in the new PM.
I tried the application Mail for a while, since they started a sort of
threading. However it is more of a lumping that a threading; and I missed
"view unread only."
I was very pleased with the export and import
Hi,
At times I get mails that look as below. The message is a reply to an
earlier mail from me, and my message started with the line "(Por favor --
remita este email a un administrador que hable inglés.)".
What is this? Can something be done to:
a) avoid getting the text formatted this way?
b)
Any chance of adapting this to use AppleWorks?
I've poked around but the combination of my Applescript illiteracy with
the variability of the Applescript dictionary between applications is
beyond me at the moment...
TIA
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
Don V. Zahniser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday,
11 matches
Mail list logo
