Re: CPU Usage query_PowerMail V. 5.1b3 demo

2004-10-19 Thread John Leiher
On 10/19/04 at 8:01 PM, PowerMail discussions (powermail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Thank-you to all who've responded to my query so far... as an adendum to my previous post I did notice a tremendous amount of HD activity while PM V. 5.1b3 demo is running or idle. I think this explains the high

Re: CPU Usage query_PowerMail V. 5.1b3 demo

2004-10-19 Thread alan
On a much faster machine (2 x 2.0 GHz G5) I get 0.2-0.5% usage (out of 200%) when PM is in the background. OSX 10.3.latest. A John Leiher at Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:53:20 -0400 said: I'm investigating the possibility of upgrading PM from V. 4.1.2 to version 5. I downloaded the 5.1b3 demo this

Re: CPU Usage query_PowerMail V. 5.1b3 demo

2004-10-19 Thread Jim Pistrang
Hi John, One problem I do notice however is the excessive CPU usage with this demo.. Activity Monitor indicates 45 to 55% CPU usage when Powermail V.5 is idle. I'm running 5.1b1 and seeing between .9 and 1.5 when PM is idle and in the background. As I type this, I see levels between 5 and 10.

CPU Usage query_PowerMail V. 5.1b3 demo

2004-10-19 Thread John Leiher
I'm investigating the possibility of upgrading PM from V. 4.1.2 to version 5. I downloaded the 5.1b3 demo this morning and since I had already tried out a demo 5xxx when it had first been released some months ago, the demo has expired. No problem with that however, my impressions of the original

DATABASE error

2004-10-19 Thread maf291
Hi -- I'm a registered user of PM 5.0.2, and have been very happy until recently... I can not use the program now because every time I start it, I get a message rebuilding indices... so I wait until just before it is finished I get Database error more details... provides the following

Re: deleting accounts existing in recieved email messages?

2004-10-19 Thread Mikael Byström
PowerMail Engineering said: What happens if I delete an account for which I have recieved and keep messages in my DB? Is it reassigned or are the messages orphaned? This was a great problem in Emailer, when it came to exporting, so I'd prefer to know. Nothing wrong. This was a bit too cryptic