I agree about the attachments folder.
Couldn't PowerMail place attachments for messages in separate folders for
each message? Becky2 for Windows does this, and is one of the reasons I
use it as my e-mail application on my Windows PC. It is very convenient
when you receive half a dozen
I will not debate eventual OSX folder limitations, tech stuff of which I
don't know too much, but for the record I must say this:
Please DO NOT confirm to the norm* mentioned below. The PowerMail
attachment behaviour is the first and very reason why I went back to
PowerMail after a year with
I hear you on this one. The attachments folder is a nice concept, but
since I just switched over I have well over 3000 items and renders using
it via the finder very difficult. I have already run through and killed
many similar and obvious dupes thanks to rounds of revisions on work for
clients
Received from: Bob Seaner
At: 8:20 pm (GMT) on Tue, Mar 18, 2003
If I move my users over to PowerMail, it will take no time
at all for them to have attachments numbering in the thousands. And
since filed messages are an ever increasing quantity, (for all practical
purposes, I don't live in an
I'd like to elicit the list's thoughts regarding the PowerMail (under OS
X) requirement that attachments stay in one folder in order for the email
that contained the attachment to maintain reference. The Finder under OS
9 encountered extreme difficulty managing directories that contained
large
5 matches
Mail list logo
