Not tried and no not at all it works OK on my AMD 64, in fact it worked on AMD
64's before Intel had a 64 bit X86 on the market...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Man-wai Chang
Sent: 25 October 2007 09:45
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: [NF]
No it just has to be present on the hard disk, hence installing it twice but
only activating it once. Vista does not know that you are installing over an
un-activated copy and accepts that you are doing an upgrade.
Cheers,
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Man-wai Chang wrote:
> Anyone done it successfully? Is Vi$ta x64 for Intel motherboards only?
>
The technician from Hong Kong's distributor for Asus said the problem
was caused by the RAID -.-"
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.23.
I wanted something to rhyme with Harsh my mellow.
--- Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im not sure what to make of that. Does he mean me :)
> Allen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: 25 October 2007 22:1
On Thursday 25 October 2007 18:39, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://dedge.com/flash/hangman/hangman.swf?a=300
Hi Michael!
Could waste the whole day doing that.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.co
http://dedge.com/flash/hangman/hangman.swf?a=300
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@lea
mrgmhale wrote:
> Yep, there is always "the other side of the story", or so it seems. I am
> sorry about the personal grief. I have gone through 2 divorces in past
> years, and know the emotional and financial grief that comes with the mess.
> Uggghhh...
>
> Gil
>
Yep...this long terrible ord
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1190607457;fp;2;fpid;1
( -or- http://tinyurl.com/256d5a )
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My SQL has laid out its software road map through 2009, including
some code contributed by Google and security improvements
On Thursday 25 October 2007 11:53, Paul McNett wrote:
> > Reminds me of an old saying: "Never argue with an asshole...passers by
> > won't know which guy is the asshole."
> >
> > I'm not saying either guy is such; just that whatever you think he is,
> > others may think that of you. Keep it in p
Im not sure what to make of that. Does he mean me :)
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 25 October 2007 22:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Public letter to Steven Black
Don't let him kid you, Alan is a harsh
Don't let him kid you, Alan is a harsh old fellow.
--- Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is that like marshing a mellow ?
> Allen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Bourke
> Sent: 25 October 2007 13:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Yep neat!
On a networked app I also limit to one user accessing the data. I also use
the limit on the main tables, example only 20 customers, products, jobs etc
As it is one base class that controls all data access really easy to
implement.
but don't do what Winzip used to do, "You are now on day
That's a perfectly adequate summary. No complaints from me ;)
Michael J. Babcock, MCP wrote:
> Was reviewing this thread amongst others in the ProFox archives:
> http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/336400
>
> David Crooks (or others) -- did you find that VFP9 actually did unearth a
> problem? Your
Thanks. I always use a main.prg.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael J. Babcock,
> MCP
> Sent: 25 October 2007 18:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Passing Parameters to an Exe
>
>
> On
Michael J. Babcock, MCP wrote:
> On Thu, October 25, 2007 9:11 am, Allen wrote:
>> Well said Ed.
>> It will only incite others to take sides in a battle that does not really
>> have anything to do with them Allen
>>
>
> Reminds me of an old saying: "Never argue with an asshole...passers by
> won
On Thu, October 25, 2007 12:48 pm, John Weller wrote:
> Thanks Brian. Where do I pick it up in the exe? Do I put a PARAMETERS
> statement in the main program?
>
Yep...put it as the first line in your MAIN program. (.prg, right? If
not and you're using a SCX, I think it'll come into the form's
Thanks Brian. Where do I pick it up in the exe? Do I put a PARAMETERS
statement in the main program?
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Abbott
> Sent: 25 October 2007 17:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Yeah, but remember the parameter is/are always character type. Just add
it to the shortcut.
John Weller wrote:
> Is it possible to pass a parameter to an exe created with VFP? What I would
> like to do is have an exe with an Ini file and pass a parameter to the exe
> when it is called by a shor
Is it possible to pass a parameter to an exe created with VFP? What I would
like to do is have an exe with an Ini file and pass a parameter to the exe
when it is called by a shortcut or a batch file telling it which section of
the ini file to use.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
On Oct 25, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Michael J. Babcock, MCP wrote:
> Reminds me of an old saying: "Never argue with an
> asshole...passers by
> won't know which guy is the asshole."
Wow, I've been saying that for years whenever someone complains
about the OT idiots, and yet...
-- Ed Leafe
On Thu, October 25, 2007 10:01 am, Alan Bourke wrote:
> Yes that's what I meant.
>
>
> How about increasing the transparency of your forms depending on days
> past the trial expiration? :)
>
LOL! I love it! ;-)
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.c
On Thu, October 25, 2007 10:02 am, David Crooks wrote:
> Most products allow for a 30 day money back guarantee so why not do the
> same? The commercial product I was involved with only allowed for 10
> records to be added to the database. Any more than that then they have to
> pay, which did happ
On Thu, October 25, 2007 9:48 am, David Crooks wrote:
> I do not think an issue was discovered in VFP9, but we do fairly regular
> maintenance on the tables that it might have corrected the 'hidden' in VFP7
> issues. YMMV...
Many thanks for the quick response, David. I'm glad we frequent here..
Michael J. Babcock, MCP wrote:
> I do limit the main table's record count so that a person can only enter
> 'n' jobs into the database, and while that works, I was just considering
> other simple ideas that could be set on startup in the main program and
> never had to be worried about anywhere els
Most products allow for a 30 day money back guarantee so why not do the
same? The commercial product I was involved with only allowed for 10
records to be added to the database. Any more than that then they have
to pay, which did happen with one company that tried and a few months
(maybe a year?)
On Thu, October 25, 2007 9:50 am, Alan Bourke wrote:
> Limit the records returned by queries to 10% of the table size?
>
I don't like that because that produces incorrect results, if I understand
you correctly.
I do limit the main table's record count so that a person can only enter
'n' jobs int
Limit the records returned by queries to 10% of the table size?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searcha
On 10/25/07, Michael J. Babcock, MCP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reminds me of an old saying: "Never argue with an asshole...passers by
> won't know which guy is the asshole."
In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "Oh, that he were here to write
me down an ass!"
___
Rather than messing around with dates, why not use some of the SET
commands to throttle down performance? I was looking at SET OPTIMIZE and
thought that perhaps that was an easy way to deter folks from using a
TRIAL version forever. I don't like the idea of time bombs and was
thinking of alternat
On 10/25/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be asking too much to keep all this fruitless bickering on
> Wikipedia, since that's where it belongs? We all have the links, and
> if anyone on this list is so inclined, they can follow them and watch
> this train wreck on that si
On Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:54 AM Michael J. Babcock, MCP wrote:
>Was reviewing this thread amongst others in the ProFox archives:
>http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/336400
>David Crooks (or others) -- did you find that VFP9 actually did unearth
a problem? Your post indicates a
>false posi
On Thu, October 25, 2007 9:11 am, Allen wrote:
> Well said Ed.
> It will only incite others to take sides in a battle that does not really
> have anything to do with them Allen
>
Reminds me of an old saying: "Never argue with an asshole...passers by
won't know which guy is the asshole."
I'm not
Man-wai Chang wrote:
> I have FPW 2.5 working under XP... just wondering about its fate in
> 64-bit Vi$ta and beyond...
>
>
64-bit Windows of any flavour does not run 16-bit applications. So
you're out of luck.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.c
On Thu, October 25, 2007 9:00 am, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
> All I wanted was for VFP, when I camel-cased a PEM, to stop lower-casing
> it before storing it in/retrieving it from the .scx/.vcx file. Even if I
> manually hack the .scx/.vcx to capitalize my custom PEMs, VFP lower-cases
> them. For my pur
Was reviewing this thread amongst others in the ProFox archives:
http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/336400
David Crooks (or others) -- did you find that VFP9 actually did unearth a
problem? Your post indicates a false positive since it appeared fine with
VFP7, but I didn't see a follow up to indi
> 2.6 will work with XP/Vista now as it had a fast processor patch (it
> does have a distribution kit). Don't know about 2.5 but I guess you can
> always try it.
I have FPW 2.5 working under XP... just wondering about its fate in
64-bit Vi$ta and beyond...
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.ne
Man-wai Chang wrote:
> Anyone done it successfully? Is Vi$ta x64 for Intel motherboards only?
>
BTW, the so called Vista-Ready, is it:
a. 32-bit
b. 64-bit
c. Both
d. None of the above
?
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.23.1
/( _ )\
On 10/25/07, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well said Ed.
> It will only incite others to take sides in a battle that does not really
> have anything to do with them
> Allen
Bit sad really...time to grow up.
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@lea
Hi all
I have a very simple report with just one detail line and four fields. I want
to "suppress repeated values" for the first field in the report but when I
choose the "Print When" tab the option for "repeated values" is disabled.
If I set _REPORTBUILDER = "", then I can get around the prob
Well said Ed.
It will only incite others to take sides in a battle that does not really
have anything to do with them
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Would it be asking too much to keep all this fruitless bickering
On Oct 25, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Garrett Fitzgerald wrote:
> I'm not going to defend myself here, because it will be a case of
> he-said-he-said, especially since you can't view edit histories on his
> wiki.
You quoted carefully-selected excerpts of a what appears to be
either a private ema
> >> However, using it makes the object that contains it incompatible with
>previous VFP versions (ie., forms won't open).<<
>
>This is only if the MemberData is more than 254 characters, and only the
>class (not the entire class library) or form with the limit broken are
>unusable in VFP 8 and
Alan Bourke wrote:
> All this fighting is, like, harshing my mellow.
Cold winter day, warm cocoa with harshmellows. mmm.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of
On 10/25/07, Steven Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>*snip*
I'm not going to defend myself here, because it will be a case of
he-said-he-said, especially since you can't view edit histories on his
wiki. As he said, I didn't send him any mail (except one snarky note
about choosing to make dinner f
On Thursday 25 October 2007 07:02, MB Software Solutions General Account
wrote:
> Pete Theisen wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 October 2007 00:21, Steven Black wrote:
> >
> > Hi Steven!
> >
> > You got into it pretty good with JVP as well, if I recall correctly. You
> > don't have a short fuse, do you?
On Thursday 25 October 2007 06:47, Alan Bourke wrote:
> All this fighting is, like, harshing my mellow.
Hi Alan!
I keep marking them [OT] but "they" keep changing it back. I know, only Ted
can enforce the [OT].
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Thursday 25 October 2007 00:21, Steven Black wrote:
>
> Hi Steven!
>
> You got into it pretty good with JVP as well, if I recall correctly. You
> don't
> have a short fuse, do you?
>
Getting into it with him doesn't mean he has a short fuse at all...some
folks just l
is that like marshing a mellow ?
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 25 October 2007 13:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Public letter to Steven Black
All this fighting is, like, harshing my mellow.
No virus fou
All this fighting is, like, harshing my mellow.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: h
Thanks Lew, the screen display was set to a different theme. The settings in
VFP were at the default, on. I havent used XP till now. Much obliged
Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: check if, whether & how each is using windows
themes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI
On Thursday 25 October 2007 04:31, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Download history is an .asx file. What Linux application do you
> > > > use to open that?
> >
>
> http://filext.com/file-extension/ASX
Hi Jean!
Fantastic!
Opened fine in KMpla
Hi Pete,
I can't find the link you refer to - can you give more details please.
Probably better if you reply offline to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then we will
be safe from the OT police .
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
I could reply but its way OT and I would not see it.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ken Dibble
Sent: 25 October 2007 03:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [NF] The System Builder OEM WinXP/Vi$ta in Amazon
Gee...what's the point
And who was the predecessor to that, hhmm forgotten. In facdt the list may
still exist as far as I know.
But yes, thanks Ed.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
That's how this list came to bethanks, Darcy Whit
On 10/25/07, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Download history is an .asx file. What Linux application do you
> > > use to open that?
> --
> Regards,
>
> Pete
http://filext.com/file-extension/ASX
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe
I don't think this is necessary on a worldwide list.
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
There was no point. They just didn't know better.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.
You must *know* by now the no system is un-crackable Man-wai :-)
Given time and (the weakest link) - people, systems are cracked all the
time.
Rob.
Rob Anderson | Software Engineer | Pegasus, an Infor company | t: +44
1536 495000 | d: +44 1536 495006 | f: +44 1536 495214 |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Thursday 25 October 2007 03:29, John Weller wrote:
> Sorry Pete, I don't understand your problem.
Hi John!
On the page accessed by your link, there is a link to a "history" which is a
download file ending in .asx. I don't know what kind of file that is. If I
did know I would know what to ope
> One day your OS or other M$ product just *doesn't* work. The cure is to buy a
> new computer or at least a new version of whatever M$ wants you to buy this
> week. This can happen at any time, with or without warning.
>
> So, no need for any user option, M$ isn't about that anyway.
>
> Don't
Anyone done it successfully? Is Vi$ta x64 for Intel motherboards only?
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.23.1
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) 16:44:01 up 11 days 19:10
^ ^2 users load average: 0.00 0.00 0.00
news://news.3home.net news://
Vince Teachout wrote:
>
> Actually, will C# even build web pages?
You would be looking at ASP.NET as the technology, you can do the code
in any .Net language and inject Javascript etc as well.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Main
Sorry Pete, I don't understand your problem.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete Theisen
> Sent: 25 October 2007 02:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Vulcans (was RE: Public letter to
Vince Teachout wrote:
> Are there good solid business reasons for using C# vs PHP, or vice
> versa? Or is C# a reasonable way to go?
>
I dunno about a business reason, but IMO you will get something much
closer to the totally integrated RAD environment that you would be used
to from VFP etc
63 matches
Mail list logo
