From VFP Help!
/FSEEK( ) returns the number of bytes the file pointer is positioned
from the beginning of the file. The file pointer can also be moved with
FREAD( ) and FWRITE( )./
So you can't use FSEEK on a file 2GB (?4Gb) because the return value
would cause an error.
iirc FREAD and FWRITE
Andy
You can use the API for this easily. Just need to handle the High Byte / Low
Byte addressing. VFP has no issue with it and handles multi - terabyte files
if one is inclined to play with files that large. I've tested with files up
to 300Gb and no issue.
-Original Message-
From:
I'm not sure if this can be of any help.
Have you tried Google remote desktop?
It does not need any twicking with W7, just install it in your machine
and theirs and you get in with no hassles. The only drawback so far is
it does not have file transfer.
But I resolved that by installing
Jeff
---
Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
www.arelationshipmanager.com
On 11/08/2013 04:45 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:
Ted: I only tried about 250 suggestions and worked on it for about
Interesting. I will look at this, but I really need to get RDT working.
Thanks!
Jeff
---
Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
www.arelationshipmanager.com
On 11/09/2013 06:55 AM, Rafael Copquin wrote:
I'm not sure if this can be of any help.
Have you
I deleted a load of messages so not sure if anyone responded with ports on a
NAT/Firewall.
TCP and UTP port 3389 is what I had open. I closed it because of hackers.
Al
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Johnson
Sent: 09 November
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Rafael Copquin wrote:
I'm not sure if this can be of any help.
Have you tried Google remote desktop?
For clarity, it's Chrome Remote Desktop and both ends need to be running
Chrome as the browser.
___
Post Messages
We had a computer freeze during the night (it gets cold in the SF Bay
Area), and the worker was doing data enter into a dbf using foxpro/dos
2.6, under program control. I flush the buffer after every record
entered, due to some 'segment errors' of yesteryear. Now we cannot get
back into the
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:42 AM, John R. Sowden
jsow...@americansentry.net wrote:
We had a computer freeze during the night (it gets cold in the SF Bay Area),
and the worker was doing data enter into a dbf using foxpro/dos 2.6, under
program control. I flush the buffer after every record
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013, at 06:53 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:42 AM, John R. Sowden
jsow...@americansentry.net wrote:
Now we cannot get back into the dbf because
it comes up as a 'not a dbf' error.
I hope it ain't Cryptolocker ...
If you have VFP you set tablevalidate to 0 and try to open the table
If you can, append an empty record, delete it, pack the table and
recreate the index.
I do that with old fox dos tables and it usually works
Rafael Copquin
El 09/11/2013 15:42, John R. Sowden escribió:
We had a computer
May be it is due to a wrong record number in theheader of the file. I don't
rememberin wich bytes it is (and it is in a 'reverse mode' ?) and try to add 1
to it (or minus 1).
When the computer freeze, may be the 'last' record was added but it has no time
to update the header.
HTH
The Foxil
Collapse imageTable Header Record Structure
Byte offset Description
0
*File type:*
0x02 FoxBASE / dBase II
0x03 FoxBASE+ / FoxPro /dBase III PLUS / dBase IV, no memo
0x30 Visual FoxPro
0x31 Visual FoxPro, autoincrement enabled
0x32 Visual FoxPro, Varchar, Varbinary, or
03 0D 0B 09 04 19 00 00-21 01 4B 00 00 00 00 00
03 : foxpro dbf without memo
0D 0B 09 : last update november, 9th 2013
04 19 00 00 : number of records : 4868
Try to write 05 or 03 instead of 04 in byte n° 4 (beginning with 0)
HTH
The Foxil
___
I have used the recovery tools from abri for years.
http://www.abri.com/
jerry
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jean MAURICE
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 1:20 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Foxpro/DOS not a dbf file error
On 11/09/2013 11:09 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013, at 06:53 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:42 AM, John R. Sowden
jsow...@americansentry.net wrote:
Now we cannot get back into the dbf because
it comes up as a 'not a dbf' error.
I hope it ain't Cryptolocker ...
On 11/09/2013 11:09 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013, at 06:53 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:42 AM, John R. Sowden
jsow...@americansentry.net wrote:
Now we cannot get back into the dbf because
it comes up as a 'not a dbf' error.
I hope it ain't Cryptolocker ...
Thanks Alan. At least we know it is secure!
Jeff
---
Jeff Johnson
j...@san-dc.com
(623) 582-0323
www.san-dc.com
www.arelationshipmanager.com
On 11/09/2013 11:26 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Rafael Copquin wrote:
I'm not sure if this can be of any
I find the popup for the select (SQL) command most annoying. It often
covers what I'm trying to type. How could I turn this off?
Mike
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
On 11/09/2013 11:25 AM, Jean MAURICE wrote:
03 0D 0B 09 04 19 00 00-21 01 4B 00 00 00 00 00
03 : foxpro dbf without memo
0D 0B 09 : last update november, 9th 2013
04 19 00 00 : number of records : 4868
Try to write 05 or 03 instead of 04 in byte n° 4 (beginning with 0)
HTH
The Foxil
Thank you all for your input. Sorry for the delay, had to repair my
wife's car. Anyway I needed a hex editor that would work on fat32.
Found uhex.zip. It is part of the freedos family of programs. Per
suggestion, I changed the 5th byte (byte 4) from 04 to 05 assuming that
the added record
I am glad to see that 'old science' is still alive !
04 19 00 00 : number of records : 4868
I made a mistake, 19 is hexadecimal so number of records should be 8404 ...
Regards
The Foxil
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
22 matches
Mail list logo
