Yes, found it now
But when I run Word, I see it under processes, but not under Services
(where I see the PID column)
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> On May 21, 2014 12:18:02 AM EDT, Sytze de Boer
> wrote:
> > My son has a 64 bit pc
> > I copied the killprg to his pc
>
On May 21, 2014 12:18:02 AM EDT, Sytze de Boer wrote:
> My son has a 64 bit pc
> I copied the killprg to his pc
> I open Word and task manager shows an Image name of winword.exe *32
> I run killprg and it kills Word
>
> What is, or how do I find the task manager PID?
>
>
In my Windows
My son has a 64 bit pc
I copied the killprg to his pc
I open Word and task manager shows an Image name of winword.exe *32
I run killprg and it kills Word
What is, or how do I find the task manager PID?
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> On May 20, 2014 11:54:34 PM EDT,
On May 20, 2014 11:54:34 PM EDT, Sytze de Boer wrote:
> Tracey, I suspect I don't understand what you're asking
> I noticed (on client pc), in Task manager, Processes, the Image name
> is
> Winword *32
> For that reason, my line in the killprg includes OR
> AT(lcProcess,UPPER(loProcess.NAME)
Tracey, I suspect I don't understand what you're asking
I noticed (on client pc), in Task manager, Processes, the Image name is
Winword *32
For that reason, my line in the killprg includes OR
AT(lcProcess,UPPER(loProcess.NAME))>0
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> On May 20,
On May 20, 2014 11:34:50 PM EDT, Sytze de Boer wrote:
> Yes it does
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tracy Pearson
> wrote:
>
> > I know you're process would open Word with the same user. Does the
> Windows
> > Task Manager show each exe was started by the same user?
> > --
Yes it does
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> I know you're process would open Word with the same user. Does the Windows
> Task Manager show each exe was started by the same user?
> --
> Tracy
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>
I know you're process would open Word with the same user. Does the Windows Task
Manager show each exe was started by the same user?
--
Tracy
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
__
The same user opens the invoice or changes the invoice, and prints/previews
the invoice.
The table or invoice is not opened by anyone else
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> Can you tell which user started the version of word that will not close?
> If it is not the same use
Can you tell which user started the version of word that will not close? If it
is not the same user, that is problematic.
--
Tracy
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
On May 20, 2014 11:12:30 PM EDT, Sytze de Boer wrote:
Tracey, I can't read your reply. I think you're on a 64 bit PC and the
message is
Sometimes the preview of the email isn't what really gets sent.
I'm on a Windows 7 64-bit computer. I have office 2007 (32-bit), and weird
closes.
--
Tracy
Sorry, Tracey, I don't understand the question.
On my pc, I can open Word and minimize Word
My killprg certainly kills it.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
>
>
> On May 20, 2014 10:22:38 PM EDT, Sytze de Boer
> wrote:
> Sorry for this VFP post
>
> I'm working with a very
On May 20, 2014 10:22:38 PM EDT, Sytze de Boer wrote:
Sorry for this VFP post
I'm working with a very old application where the client absolutely
wanted
to create/edit their invoices per a Word file (doc)
So my app opens a word document with ShellExecute, and stores the
details
per routine
Appe
Tracey, I can't read your reply. I think you're on a 64 bit PC and the
message is
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
On May 20, 2014 10:22:38 PM EDT, Sytze de Boer wrote:
>Sorry for this VFP post
>
>I'm working with a very old application where the client absolutely
>wanted
>to create/edit their invoices per a Word file (doc)
>So my app opens a word document with ShellExecute, and stores the
>details
>per routin
Sorry for this VFP post
I'm working with a very old application where the client absolutely wanted
to create/edit their invoices per a Word file (doc)
So my app opens a word document with ShellExecute, and stores the details
per routine
Append General rtfgen From &thefile Link
(where thefile may b
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:08 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 17:05, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>> There wan't enough money for resources to fund Fox anymore. You buy a
>> copy
>> and sell 100 different apps to other companies while M$ makes nothing.
>>
>
>
On Tue, May 20, 2014, at 10:05 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> There wan't enough money for resources to fund Fox anymore. You buy a
> copy
> and sell 100 different apps to other companies while M$ makes nothing.
>
You can do that with the free versions of the dev tools and SQL Server.
I don
On 2014-05-20 17:05, Stephen Russell wrote:
There wan't enough money for resources to fund Fox anymore. You buy a
copy
and sell 100 different apps to other companies while M$ makes nothing.
Exactly. Hence why they let it wither and die on the vine.
Charging people for data is good $. Jus
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:46 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> M$ probably knew that, and because he was popular with the Fox community,
> it was probably an appeasement move or something to shut them up for a
> little while longer. Simply put: they didn't want the Fox
M$ probably knew that, and because he was popular with the Fox
community, it was probably an appeasement move or something to shut them
up for a little while longer. Simply put: they didn't want the Fox to
succeed wildly...just enough but not more. See the comment about Bill
Gates losing $20
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:49 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 13:04, Alan Bourke wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014, at 03:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>>
>> Node.js looks interesting. I brought it up at a dev group meeting last
>>> year but it was shot do
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:38 PM, kamcgin...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am interested in something like this to create a UI in a browser.
>
> However, I don't think Node.js is very good for my accounts receivable
> relational database (VFP9 SP2) application. Here is what I found on this
> page: http://
On 2014-05-20 13:04, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014, at 03:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Node.js looks interesting. I brought it up at a dev group meeting
last
year but it was shot down because it was different.
Different? Half the world is using it and jquery.
Perhaps they M$
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014, at 03:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> > Node.js looks interesting. I brought it up at a dev group meeting last
> > year but it was shot down because it was different.
> >
>
> Different? Half the world is using it a
Dear Vixens and Reynards:
When I use CDO to send E-mail, the case of the attachment
filenames gets changed to upper case. I want to preserve the
case. How do I do this?
I have tried quoting the filename, but that did not work.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
I am interested in something like this to create a UI in a browser.
However, I don't think Node.js is very good for my accounts receivable
relational database (VFP9 SP2) application. Here is what I found on this
page: http://www.toptal.com/nodejs/why-the-hell-would-i-use-node-js
"Using Node.j
On Tue, May 20, 2014, at 03:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> Node.js looks interesting. I brought it up at a dev group meeting last
> year but it was shot down because it was different.
>
Different? Half the world is using it and jquery.
___
Post Me
On 2014-05-20 04:34, Peter Cushing wrote:
http://laughingsquid.com/the-expert-a-hilarious-sketch-about-the-pain-of-being-the-only-engineer-in-a-business-meeting/
HILARIOUS!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http:/
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Paul Hemans wrote:
> I have been involved recently with a lot of behaviour driven design with
> Javascript. It has made me realize that there is definitely a gap that is
> begging to be filled. In my opinion Foxpro/DBase is a database DSL and
> should stay with its
That Node.js looks really powerful Paul definitely worth looking into.
I never knew of its existence.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hemans
Sent: 20 May 2014 12:48
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: What would you like
I
Like Al says, you can change variable/object properties but not the underlying
code.
And Stephen not a wake, maybe just a little "what if..." session ... to
keep us all AWAKE!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
Sent: 20 May 20
I have been involved recently with a lot of behaviour driven design with
Javascript. It has made me realize that there is definitely a gap that is
begging to be filled. In my opinion Foxpro/DBase is a database DSL and
should stay with its strengths. So what I would like, would be to forget
about th
Is this thread a wake?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR87LsmXzBs
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Allen wrote:
> You can change properties but not code as far as I know.
> Al
>
> -Original Message-
>
> >
> > > 2. Real time debugger with the ability to change code on the fly
> > > with
You can change properties but not code as far as I know.
Al
-Original Message-
>
> > 2. Real time debugger with the ability to change code on the fly
> > without
> re-running the program
You already have that. What is the command window all about right?
_
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Bill Arnold <
billjarn...@h2officesolutions.com> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> > 2. Real time debugger with the ability to change code on the fly without
> re-running the program
>
>
>
> This would be my top pick. Under the covers it could let us make
I would like 1. As I have Asian clients. I think 2. Is possible with AFP
now. And as for 3. I would like it the other way. Use VFP, tables at least
without OLDDB or whatever the buzzword is now, in dotnet
Al
-Original Message-
1. Unicode support (for Asian users)
2. Browser-based run-tim
On 19 May 2014 22:16, Dave Crozier wrote:
> On the basis that VFP will never be updated now or taken over into the "open
> source" world
> - whatever M$ say and promise...
> What is it that you would like added into VFP that would make it once again
> into a
> market leading product?
1. Unicode
On 19 May 2014 22:16, Dave Crozier wrote:
> On the basis that VFP will never be updated now or taken over into the "open
> source" world - whatever M$ say and promise...
>
> What is it that you would like added into VFP that would make it once again
> into a market leading product?
>
> Just my 2
>
> Re "VFP is dead", what we need from MS is a declaration that VFP will
> continue to work for the life of Windows. Call this "support" or
> something else.
>
Well, it's support. Which as we know is ending. So if some update to Windows
7 or 8 down the road breaks something fundamental we bet
ROFL.
Indeed it does i have one of those meetings the 10th of june.
A+
jml
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Peter Cushing <
pcush...@whisperingsmith.com> wrote:
>
> Kind of sums it up perfectly.
>
> Peter
>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain
I don't tell them unless they ask. But my competitors know and they
certainly do tell. Along with backhanders I cannot afford. They also go on
about small companies. But they conveniently forget big ones go bust first
and are slow to respond. Maybe I should put that in my ad's.
My ex partner did so
Al,
So don't tell them ... the majority of customers don't give a stuff about
what/how it's written as long as it works.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
Sent: 20 May 2014 09:34
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: What would you like
Dave Crozier wrote:
Although having technical people act as "marketing" folk for products invariably brings in enthusiasm and obvious technical ability the best Marketing people are those who can play the business politics game and have/make contacts that are also political heavyweights.
Ah yes "
Not that the kind of dead more's the pity. The kind of dead when the
competitors make a big deal about your programs written in a dead language.
We all know VFP works fine for now on win 8.1 even. But you can't beat lies.
Al
-Original Message-
Well, it's support. Which as we know is endi
On Tue, May 20, 2014, at 08:11 AM, Bill Arnold wrote:
>
>
> Re "VFP is dead", what we need from MS is a declaration that VFP will
> continue to work for the life of Windows. Call this "support" or
> something
> else.
>
Well, it's support. Which as we know is ending. So if some update to
Window
Dave,
> 2. Real time debugger with the ability to change code on the fly without
re-running the program
This would be my top pick. Under the covers it could let us make changes to
a copy of the actual program code with an option to "save changes" when the
debugging sessi
47 matches
Mail list logo
