Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-15 Thread Ted Roche
On 9/13/06, Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Next Windows After Vista Will Demand Radical Rethinking From Microsoft http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=L23HLZAEIVRZYQSNDLPCKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=192501131queryText=Windows+After+Vista http://tinyurl.com/j8vhs

RE: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-15 Thread Dave Crozier
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: 15 September 2006 14:22 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles On 9/13/06, Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Next Windows After Vista Will Demand Radical Rethinking From Microsoft http

Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-15 Thread Michael Hawksworth
Not while they have corporations with 10K+ seats saying that they couldn't cope if things aren't fully backward compatible they wont. -- Michael Hawksworth Visual Fox Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.foxpro.co.uk ___ Post Messages to:

Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-15 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
government and Health authorities. His comment recently was that whereas these orgainisations were renewing hardware every 2 years, that has now gone up to 3 years and looks like rising towards 4. I have four servers in the basement. 3 of them are seven years old. The fourth is 4 years old.

Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-15 Thread Ed Leafe
On Sep 15, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Michael Hawksworth wrote: Not while they have corporations with 10K+ seats saying that they couldn't cope if things aren't fully backward compatible they wont. Wasn't that why they bought Virtual PC? The idea was that anything that wouldn't run in the new

RE: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-15 Thread mrgmhale
circumstances. And once heading back home, I wish you a safe journey. Gil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

RE: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-14 Thread Hal Kaplan
= -Original Message- = From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Anderson = Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 20:33 = To: ProFox Email List = Subject: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles =  =  = Google Revealed: The IT Strategy That Makes It Work =  = http

Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-14 Thread Bill Anderson
Hal Kaplan wrote: See? It's starting already. Even though it hasn't RTM'd, Vista's successor is now the topic of discussion. BTW, the code name for that piece of vaporware is BULL DURHAM Happened recently with VS2005. MSFT loudly trumpeted LINQ, which wasn't due until the 3.0 timeframe.

[NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-13 Thread Bill Anderson
Google Revealed: The IT Strategy That Makes It Work http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=L23HLZAEIVRZYQSNDLPCKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=192300292queryText=google+revealed http://tinyurl.com/krxj5 The Next Windows After Vista Will Demand Radical Rethinking From Microsoft

Re: [NF] -- Good InformationWeek articles

2006-09-13 Thread MB Software Solutions
Bill Anderson wrote: Google Revealed: The IT Strategy That Makes It Work http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=L23HLZAEIVRZYQSNDLPCKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=192300292queryText=google+revealed http://tinyurl.com/krxj5 Liked this one: [He then takes a jab at