Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Jean Laeremans
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com My Baptist friends keep trying to convince me that wine back in the day was actually Welsh's Grape Juice, as if the purpose of Jesus' first miracle

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
[mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, 5 February 2009 10:35 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Calvin gets it Thanks again for lobbing this grenade my way. I'll pull the pin out and lob it back soon. ;) - Bob I'll be waiting for it Bob. But please, do as with functions, if it is much longer than a screen then you should

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
in the US. * 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Wed, 2/4/09, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it To: ProFox Email

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Bob Calco
Mike: Please. All I get is broken-English obscenities. I fail to see any wit. Well, you're right about both the broken English and obscenities. In any case, he has engaged me more respectfully than usual on a topic of interest to me, so I can forgive even his manners. I'm pretty tolerant

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Stephen Russell
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff Flight wrote: The play book? In the rest of Christendom we just read the Bible and follow that. Semes to work pretty well. And you get a crowd of ignorant turds interpreting what has taken millenniums of highly

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Michael Madigan
Still think he's witty, Calco? * 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Thu, 2/5/09, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Michael Madigan
Are you writing this down, Calco? * 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Thu, 2/5/09, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Bob Calco
Ricardo: And you get a crowd of ignorant turds interpreting what has taken millenniums of highly educated and intelligent theologists to get right. Ah, the educated and highly intelligent folk. IMHO, they're the cause of most of the confusion about what scripture actually says. Wise in

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Bob Calco
Mike: Still think he's witty, Calco? Are you writing this down, Calco? There is no question Ricardo's got zero respect for anybody but himself in most conversations (not all, but most), and he all-too-often resorts to the interpersonal communication equivalent of wet farts and loud burps,

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Michael Madigan
LOL BTW, *coincidentally*, Sympathy for the Devil is playing on the radio as I write this ;0) - Bob ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote: Mike: Please. All I get is broken-English obscenities. I fail to see any wit. Well, you're right about both the broken English and obscenities. In any case, he has engaged me more respectfully than usual on a topic of interest to me, so I can forgive even his

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Stephen Russell wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff Flight wrote: The play book? In the rest of Christendom we just read the Bible and follow that. Semes to work pretty well. And you get a crowd of ignorant turds interpreting

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote: Ricardo: And you get a crowd of ignorant turds interpreting what has taken millenniums of highly educated and intelligent theologists to get right. Ah, the educated and highly intelligent folk. IMHO, they're the cause of most of the confusion about what

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote: Mike: Still think he's witty, Calco? Are you writing this down, Calco? There is no question Ricardo's got zero respect for anybody but himself in most conversations (not all, but most), and he all-too-often resorts to the interpersonal communication

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Bob Calco
Ricardo: LOL, the truth is I'm 12y.o. and I love burps and farts. OIC. So your wife is your pillow, the women of other men you screw with reckless abandon are your dad's socks, and your boat is one of those plastic models you can buy for under 28 Pesos at the super market in Buenos Aires. And

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-05 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote: Ricardo: LOL, the truth is I'm 12y.o. and I love burps and farts. OIC. So your wife is your pillow, the women of other men you screw with reckless abandon are your dad's socks, Nope! My wife is my right hand, the other women are my left hand. and your boat is one

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed. After all this, a closet Catholic? Or just a closet altar boy? :) - Bob Naaahh! You know the vast majority of Americans

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Michael Madigan
...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 7:12 AM Bob Calco wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Stephen Russell
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed. After all this, a closet Catholic?

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Bob Calco
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed. After all this, a closet Catholic?

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Bob Calco
way. I'll pull the pin out and lob it back soon. ;) - Bob -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:12 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it Bob Calco

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
[mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 7:12 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it Bob Calco wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Bob Calco
Thanks again for lobbing this grenade my way. I'll pull the pin out and lob it back soon. ;) - Bob I'll be waiting for it Bob. But please, do as with functions, if it is much longer than a screen then you should refactorize it. Sometimes I try to explain too much. You and Michael

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Geoff Flight
10:42 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it Bob Calco wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed. After all this, a closet Catholic? Or just a closet altar boy

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Geoff Flight
Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed. After all this, a closet Catholic

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Stephen Russell
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed.

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Geoff Flight
12:52 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Calvin gets it Thanks again for lobbing this grenade my way. I'll pull the pin out and lob it back soon. ;) - Bob I'll be waiting for it Bob. But please, do as with functions, if it is much longer than a screen then you should

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Michael Madigan
] Calvin gets it To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:22 PM Thanks again for lobbing this grenade my way. I'll pull the pin out and lob it back soon. ;) - Bob I'll be waiting for it Bob. But please, do as with functions, if it is much

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Bob Calco
: [OT] Calvin gets it Thanks for lumping me in with that douchbag. * 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Michael Madigan
...@tampabay.rr.com Subject: RE: [OT] Calvin gets it To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:52 PM LOL! You guys are poles apart on substance, and I agree with you a lot more than I agree with Ricardo, but you both like the verbal spit-ball style of debate

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2009/02/02 ...and finally concludes that he is like so many others: http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2009/02/04/ -- Ed Leafe ___ Post

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Paul Hill
://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Wed, 2/4/09, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 7:12 AM Bob Calco wrote: Ricardo: Brands? The only

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-04 Thread Michael Madigan
. * 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Wed, 2/4/09, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it To: ProFox Email

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Bob Calco
GOTCHA ! ! ! ! ! Bobby! You messed up! God did not show up in the flesh. AFAIK Jesus (let's say for a minute we accept his historical existence) never stated he was god, he said he was the son of god. And the burning bush then you should have said in the wood (besides which, the bush

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread James Roark(The Dogstar Group)
Helio Wakasugui wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: 2. God already did show up and introduce Himself, in the flesh, and continues to reveal Himself in history and creation. So He definitely exists. - Bob Really? Where? As told in

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Bob Calco
2. God already did show up and introduce Himself, in the flesh, and continues to reveal Himself in history and creation. So He definitely exists. - Bob Really? Where? As told in the bible? You're a totally deluded guy, Bob. Face it, the bible is mostly made up. There is no

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Geoff Flight
In this case AFAIK doesn’t mean much because F isn’t much of a distance. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Tuesday, 3 February 2009 8:30 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it Bob Calco

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Stephen Russell
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: Bob Calco wrote: Actually no Calvin doesn't get it. 1. Santa Clause does not exist, that's why he can't show up and introduce himself; 2. God already did show up and introduce Himself, in the flesh, and continues to

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Helio Wakasugui
What makes you think your version of religion (the christian type) is true while other versions (all the rest) are not? A voice inside your head? Yeah, definitely you're nuts. HW On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Good luck, friend. BTW, I know

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Helio Wakasugui
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: 2. God already did show up and introduce Himself, in the flesh, and continues to reveal Himself in history and creation. So He definitely exists. - Bob Really? Where? As told in the bible? You're a totally

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
, February 02, 2009 10:10 PM To: ProFox Mailing List Subject: [OT] Calvin gets it http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2009/02/02 -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread James Roark(The Dogstar Group)
James Roark(The Dogstar Group) wrote: Helio Wakasugui wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: 2. God already did show up and introduce Himself, in the flesh, and continues to reveal Himself in history and creation. So He definitely

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Tuesday, 3 February 2009 8:30 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it Bob Calco wrote: Actually no Calvin doesn't get it. 1. Santa Clause does not exist, that's why he can't show up and introduce himself; 2. God already

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Geoff Flight
Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2009 8:54 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it Geoff Flight wrote: In this case AFAIK doesn’t mean much because F isn’t much of a distance. Good

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bob Calco wrote: GOTCHA ! ! ! ! ! Bobby! You messed up! God did not show up in the flesh. AFAIK Jesus (let's say for a minute we accept his historical existence) never stated he was god, he said he was the son of god. And the burning bush then you should have said in the wood (besides

Re: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
times. The prosecution rests. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2009 8:54 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Calvin gets it Geoff Flight wrote: In this case AFAIK

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-03 Thread Bob Calco
Ricardo: Brands? The only valid Christianity is Roman Catholic, the rest are not brands, they are sects and as such to be dismissed. After all this, a closet Catholic? Or just a closet altar boy? :) - Bob ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

[OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-02 Thread Ed Leafe
http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2009/02/02 -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-02 Thread Bob Calco
use something besides the Huffing-and-puffington Post for his arguments, finally. - Bob -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:10 PM To: ProFox Mailing List Subject: [OT] Calvin gets

RE: [OT] Calvin gets it

2009-02-02 Thread Geoff Flight
: [OT] Calvin gets it Actually no Calvin doesn't get it. 1. Santa Clause does not exist, that's why he can't show up and introduce himself; 2. God already did show up and introduce Himself, in the flesh, and continues to reveal Himself in history and creation. So He definitely exists. But it's