On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote:
Perhaps if you live in a dictatorship such as Australia or anywhere in
the UK, but we have freedom of the press here. Thus, underwear pictures
per se are not banned. It is tasteless, however.
A bare breast otoh
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net
wrote:
Perhaps if you live in a dictatorship such as Australia or anywhere in
the UK, but we have freedom of the press here. Thus
I am all for banning fun in Kangaroo Country.
- Original Message -
From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au
To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 12:51 AM
Subject: RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
REAL
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net
wrote:
Perhaps if you live in a dictatorship
Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
I am all for banning fun in Kangaroo Country.
- Original Message -
From: Geoff Flight data...@adam.com.au
To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 12:51 AM
1. I photograph many times where the sound of a camera is inappropriate.
Concerts, weddings, etc.
2. Covering the speaker on the camera will circumvent any laws.
3. What's wrong with upskirt photos? LOL
*
1/20/2013 Eviction Notice
Michael Madigan wrote:
1. I photograph many times where the sound of a camera is inappropriate.
Concerts, weddings, etc.
2. Covering the speaker on the camera will circumvent any laws.
3. What's wrong with upskirt photos? LOL
Hi Michael!
If the skirt wearer has clean underwear on
:23 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Michael Madigan wrote:
1. I photograph many times where the sound of a camera is inappropriate.
Concerts, weddings, etc.
2. Covering the speaker on the camera will circumvent any
Geoff Flight wrote:
Breaching privacy but not being identifiable is hardly ok. Some things are
just wrong - such as this. The camera sound idea tho is just absurd.
Hi Geoff!
Perhaps if you live in a dictatorship such as Australia or anywhere in
the UK, but we have freedom of the press here.
...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 9:42 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Breaching privacy but not being identifiable is hardly ok. Some things are
just wrong
: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 6:03 PM
Breaching privacy but not being identifiable is hardly ok.
Some things are
just wrong - such as this. The camera sound idea tho is
just
Geoff Flight wrote:
Hi Geoff!
It certainly doesn't take anything to get you into ad hominem outrage.
Australia, and any country that bans private ownership of handguns by
law-abiding citizens, is a dictatorship. It may be dictatorship by
committee, but it is dictatorship nevertheless.
It is
, 28 January 2009 10:17 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Hi Geoff!
It certainly doesn't take anything to get you into ad hominem outrage.
Australia, and any country that bans private ownership
Geoff Flight wrote:
Like so many gun-loving Americans you get in some sort of frenzy at the
thought of a country that bans them. And then you look at the 50,000 gun
deaths in your country and the 100 in ours.
Hi Geoff!
http://www.tincher.to/myths.htm
--
Regards,
Pete
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote:
1. I photograph many times where the sound of a camera is inappropriate.
Concerts, weddings, etc.
2. Covering the speaker on the camera will circumvent any laws.
3. What's wrong with upskirt photos? LOL
: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Like so many gun-loving Americans you get in some sort of frenzy at the
thought of a country that bans them. And then you look at the 50,000 gun
deaths in your country and the 100 in ours.
Hi Geoff
[mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 11:13 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to
congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Like so many gun-loving Americans you get in some sort
Geoff Flight wrote:
You just keep believing that and in the meantime 50,000 each year die from
guns while very few do here.
Hi Geoff!
Both are myths, but you didn't read the link, did you. The 50 k figure
includes every conceivable death - crooks killing victims, crooks
killing cops,
Michael Madigan wrote:
I know you love pulling facts out of your ass, but it's more like 29,000
deaths. And, 16,000+ are suicides, so I guess you'd prefer that they drink
poison or stick their head in the oven.
There are only 11,624 homicides by gun.
of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Michael Madigan wrote:
I know you love pulling facts out of your ass, but it's more like 29,000
deaths. And, 16,000+ are suicides, so I guess you'd prefer that they drink
poison or stick their head in the oven.
There are only 11,624 homicides
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
I know you love pulling facts out of your ass, but it's more like 29,000
deaths. And, 16,000+ are suicides, so I guess you'd prefer that they drink
poison or stick their head in the oven
Geoff Flight wrote:
When pete quoted the NRA as the 'gold-standard' in
statistics regarding gun deaths you know that his credibility
Hi Geoff!
NRA IS the gold standard, if you don't recognize that then you have the
problem, not anyone else.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
a figure
to prove a point...
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 2:57 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Like so many gun-loving Americans you get in some sort of frenzy at the
thought of a country that bans them. And then you look at the 50,000 gun
Hi Geoff!
OK, this doesn't break out the suicides, cops killing crooks, crooks
killing each other and crooks killing victims but
...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 3:07 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Like so many gun-loving Americans you get in some sort of frenzy
Pete Theisen wrote:
Geoff Flight wrote:
When pete quoted the NRA as the 'gold-standard' in
statistics regarding gun deaths you know that his credibility
Hi Geoff!
NRA IS the gold standard, if you don't recognize that then you have the
problem, not anyone else.
Here you go! More data
law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Pete Theisen wrote:
Geoff Flight wrote:
When pete quoted the NRA as the 'gold-standard' in
statistics regarding gun deaths you know that his credibility
Hi Geoff!
NRA IS the gold standard, if you don't recognize that then you have
] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 3:14 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Pete Theisen wrote:
Geoff Flight wrote:
When pete quoted the NRA as the 'gold-standard' in
statistics regarding gun deaths
Geoff Flight wrote:
Lets assume I was wrong and 30,000 is the correct figure. How does that in
any way change the force of my argument? THIRTY THOUSAND people killed by
guns. And you don't see a problem? Ignoring crime related gun deaths is
absurd! One of the major arguments about guns is that
Geoff Flight wrote:
Which part of the NRA being an untrsustworthy supplier of stats do you have
troube with?
Hi Geoff!
As far as I can see you have been quoting some anti-gun source that is
just as biased as you claim the NRA is.
When pete quoted the NRA as the 'gold-standard' in
Geoff Flight wrote:
These table for all of USA tells me there were 30,364 firearm deaths, 32,637
suicides PLUS 18,124 homicides. It doesn't seem to give a breakdown of gun
related deaths into accident homicide and suicide.
Hi Geoff!
How about this?
-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 3:30 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Lets assume I was wrong and 30,000
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
These table for all of USA tells me there were 30,364 firearm deaths,
32,637
suicides PLUS 18,124 homicides. It doesn't seem to give a breakdown of gun
related deaths into accident homicide
Geoff Flight wrote:
You are starting with the 'specious interpretation' phase of statistics
which places like NRA do. Deaths of criminals don't count (in your view) and
are therefore conveniently ignored. Suicides are ignored because they 'don't
matter' and so on it goes. And even with that
: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 3:37 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
These table for all of USA tells me there were 30,364 firearm deaths,
32,637
suicides PLUS 18,124 homicides. It doesn't seem
Geoff Flight wrote:
Link doesn't work but at risk of being repetitive, using the NRA sit hardly
gives the figures independent support.
Hi Geoff!
The independent sites are all anti-gun - just as biased as you claim
the NRA to be.
Oh, well, bed time. We will pursue this later.
--
Regards,
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
You are starting with the 'specious interpretation' phase of statistics
which places like NRA do. Deaths of criminals don't count (in your view)
and
are therefore conveniently ignored
List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Link doesn't work but at risk of being repetitive, using the NRA sit
hardly
gives the figures independent support.
Hi Geoff!
The independent sites are all anti-gun - just as biased as you
Flight data...@adam.com.au
Subject: RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 11:21 PM
Only a gun-lover could describe 11,624 homicides using the
word 'only'. What
you have done
data...@adam.com.au
Subject: RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 11:23 PM
And we have 100 and that includes ALL gun deaths. USA is
15 times our
population size and close to 500
, 28 January 2009 3:56 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Geoff Flight wrote:
Link doesn't work
http://tinyurl.com/d6gfms
but at risk of being repetitive, using the NRA sit hardly
gives the figures independent support
and
everyone enjoys.
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Michael Madigan
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 4:17 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)
New York
Who cares
42 matches
Mail list logo
