On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Gene - agreed. Although, now according to Ted - we are NOT so Unusual!
> :-)
I think I am being misquoted out of context!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.
, 2016 4:16 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
At 11:30 2016-11-04, Ted Roche wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
[snip]
> > Myself - never really worked within Frameworks. They just weren't
> used on t
Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 7:30 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original Codebook
book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city), Massachusetts.
Imag
At 07:40 2016-11-07, Dave Crozier wrote:
Frameworks are ok but only when you want to do the things that the
framework allows.
And at that point, you may be so deep in that it is made
difficult to break out.
This applies more generally to the approach one takes to one's
app. Some
At 11:30 2016-11-04, Ted Roche wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
[snip]
> Myself - never really worked within Frameworks. They just weren't
used on the various jobs I worked at. I did work on this one system
- where they guy had created Classes - and I used his exist
+1
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> Jean Laeremans
> Sent: 07 November 2016 15:57
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
&
2016 18:00
Para: profox@leafe.com
Asunto: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
Build my own set of custom classes (not worthy of calling a 'framework'
) but works for all my in-house projects.
Spend lot of time building a Data layer on the premise that I will
change the backen
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
> I also find that a set of classes, well written and tested are the best
> way to generate an application and they are easily updateable/modified
> using either a bae class update or using subclassing.
> -
Isn't that what a fram
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Frameworks are ok but only when you want to do the things that the framework
> allows.
What was it you wanted to do that the framework wouldn't?
> I also find that a set of classes, well written and tested are the best way
> to generate an
-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 3:31 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
++1
-Mensaje original-
De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Jean Laeremans
Enviado el: lunes, 07 de noviembre de 2016 16:57
Para: ProFox Email List
Asunto: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
+1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Dave Crozier wrote
teable/modified
> using either a bae class update or using subclassing.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
> Sent: 07 November 2016 15:25
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: Friday Poll: What fra
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: 07 November 2016 15:25
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
Hey Ted - I hear ya - as I can also type fast. Learned touch-typing back in my
Jr. year in high
2-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 3:31 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt We
Me too.
-Lew Schwartz
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote:
> Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was willing
> to pay.
>
> Laurie
>
> On 4 November 2016 at 14:29, Ted Roche wrote:
>
> > I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
Thanks Ed, didn't know that.
Laurie
On 5 November 2016 at 13:21, Edward Leafe wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote:
>
> > Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was
> willing
> > to pay.
>
> Codebook was (still is) free.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[
On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote:
> Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was willing
> to pay.
Codebook was (still is) free.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: ht
Actually, it is just a very simple one, so simple that I dunno whether
it's a framework or not. :)
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> So, what framework(s) do you work with, and why (or why not)?
_x_ Built my own
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9
On 2016-11-04 18:36, Bill Anderson wrote:
To me this comes off a bit of "Floor Wax/Dessert Topping", except for
one important feature -- it works.
BWAHAHAHAHA LOVE THAT SNL SKIT!!!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscri
On 2016-11-04 10:29, Ted Roche wrote:
So, what framework(s) do you work with, and why (or why not)?
__ Built my own
Rolled my own years ago. Built on the logical n-tier concept. Been
serving MBSS very well since 2004!
___
Post Messages to: ProF
Ted,
Fox Express is my preferred framework. Grokking this framework is a great
educational experience.
I end up on a lot of VMP projects, so I know it's a popular framework,
probably the most popular VFP framework out there. I think of it as a
hybrid framework, a mix of RAD and OO. To me this com
s buy that framework for the projects that I've worked
on.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 10:30 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
So, what fram
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Ted - You must have a Lot of extra time on your hands - what with creating
> all these Polls!
I type fast. And it's not like I haven't thought about this stuff for 25 years.
And my commute averages around zero minutes.
> Myself - never reall
o: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original Codebook book,
sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city), Massachusetts.
Imagine starting an application and not having to worry about how t
Codemine
Gojko B.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archi
Codemine
Gojko B.
At 15:29 4.11.2016, you wrote:
I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city),
Massachusetts.
Imagine starting an application and not having to worry about how to
get the menu working (Help, A
At 07:29 2016-11-04, Ted Roche wrote:
[snip]
So, what framework(s) do you work with, and why (or why not)?
__ Built my own
It is this or nothing.
My boss has a way of asking for things that break my
paradigm. I would rather be trying to rework my code than someone else's.
Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was willing
to pay.
Laurie
On 4 November 2016 at 14:29, Ted Roche wrote:
> I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
> Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city),
> Massachusetts.
>
>
I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city),
Massachusetts.
Imagine starting an application and not having to worry about how to
get the menu working (Help, About, Copy/Cut/Paste, Print settings) and
getting ba
29 matches
Mail list logo
