On 29/05/2014 09:56 AM, Peter Cushing wrote:
I have an app that does my reporting/printing and emailing out of
jobs. I developed it in VFP7 and it has been running nicely for
years. We got VFP9 for the new reporting engine so I want to run this
app in 9. Copied all the code to a new folder
Frank Cazabon wrote:
This may be the solution you need:
http://cathypountney.blogspot.com/2009/04/set-talk-appears-to-be-on-when-running.html
Excellent, that works great thanks. Like the article says you have to
work round the appstore crap.
One thing I'm not quite sure about is that the
On 29/05/2014 11:13 AM, Peter Cushing wrote:
So I have modified the class but checked my project and it is not
included. I can run the EXE not from within fox and it does not
display this error but just wondering if I'm running the wrong version
and should include C:\Program Files\Microsoft
[mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Carl Lindner
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:40 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: VFP9-Reporting
Sytze,
I ran across this problem last week. I used adir and looked for DEVICE=
in expr. Out of 500 or so reports the problem appeared in 20 or so. I
Yepper, check for contents in tag1 and tag2 of the frx file.
On 11 July 2012 16:06, Sytze de Boer sytze.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to determine if the printer environment has been saved in a
report ?
--
Regards
Sytze de Boer
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME
Thank you Desmond
I've noticed the EXPR changes if you remove the Printer Environment
By removing the TAG and TAG2 details, you haven't really removed the
Printer Environment, have you?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Desmond Lloyd desmond.ll...@gmail.comwrote:
Yepper, check for
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP9-Reporting
Thank you Desmond
I've noticed the EXPR changes if you remove the Printer Environment By
removing the TAG and TAG2 details, you haven't really removed the Printer
Environment, have you?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Desmond Lloyd
desmond.ll
Good question. Let me check. However whenever I have been having
problems with misbehaving reports removing the contents of tag1 and
tag2 have helped on numerous occasions.
Regards,
Desmond
On 11 July 2012 16:23, Sytze de Boer sytze.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Desmond
I've noticed
On 07/11/12 14:40, Carl Lindner wrote:
Sytze,
I ran across this problem last week. I used adir and looked for DEVICE=
in expr. Out of 500 or so reports the problem appeared in 20 or so. I
opened the reports and uncheched the printer environment.
Crude, but it seems to have worked with
why to have that much coding, just to get report to be ZOOMed by default ?
Here it is,
REPORT FORM your_report_file_name ALL PREVIEW NOWAIT
IF WEXIST('Report Designer')
ZOOM WINDOW 'Report Designer' MAX
ENDIF
thats all, chek this.
Ma
___
Post
mmkangod wrote:
why to have that much coding, just to get report to be ZOOMed by default ?
Here it is,
REPORT FORM your_report_file_name ALL PREVIEW NOWAIT
IF WEXIST('Report Designer')
ZOOM WINDOW 'Report Designer' MAX
ENDIF
thats all, chek this.
Ma
Agreed. Why, Garrett??
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:37, MB Software Solutions, LLC
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
mmkangod wrote:
why to have that much coding, just to get report to be ZOOMed by default ?
Agreed. Why, Garrett?? Perhaps I missed something.
As I mentioned in the initial email, I
Though I use XFRX in preference, I thought I would have a quick look at your
code
Why does my test fail on the 2nd line with loPC
S
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Garrett Fitzgerald sarekofvul...@gmail.com
wrote:
As I believe I mentioned in an earlier thread, I wanted to have a VFP9
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 16:21, Sytze de Boer sytze.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Though I use XFRX in preference, I thought I would have a quick look at your
code
Why does my test fail on the 2nd line with loPC
Because I removed the LOCAL loPC declaration at the top, forgetting
that LOCAL actually
14 matches
Mail list logo
