>
>I choose to learn to work within the confines of my condition. I can't
>imagine rolling over and turning my back on the occupation I have loved
>being involved with for over 20 years. Much less leaving my clients hanging
>in the breeze. I have more of a condition that will change how I do th
ook for help from any such
organization. Never had to consider it in the past. Thank you.
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Dibble
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
At 10:06 AM 2/2/07, you wrote:
> >> Voice recognition is getting more and more accurate by the day, but it is
> >> important to realize that (1) it's still a very tough problem to solve and
> >> (2) there are parallel efforts attacking the problem. The parallel tracks
> >> are handling (1) an unlim
hing at
65mph, a closing ...
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 1:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
>
Jeff Johnson wrote:
> We had a guy in our user group - Tim Anderson I think his name was. He
> scanned books like Code Complete. He said it didn't take long once you got
> after it. He had a kid do it for him. He reviewed the text and removed any
> diagrams that would not convert to speech. He
Aight, uv convinced me.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:03 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
john harvey wrote:
> I beg y
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
>
> >> Voice recognition is getting more and more accurate by th
john harvey wrote:
> I beg your pardon, it's properly spelled y'all.
I believe that's the singular formal. I was referring to the plural
casual form.
Sorry, if I'd been able to attach an audio clip of the message, it would
have been more obvious.
But my Windows computer says I'm pirating my ow
I beg your pardon, it's properly spelled y'all.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:07 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>> Voice recognition is getting more and more accurate by the day, but it is
>> important to realize that (1) it's still a very tough problem to solve and
>> (2) there are parallel efforts attacking the problem. The parallel tracks
>> are handling (1) an unlimited domain for a single speaker and (2
heh-heh, Ed, you especially will continue to be plagued by me!
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 8:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text softwa
Gil: Sorry to hear about your medical issues. Sounds like you have a good
approach to dealing with it. Good luck!
We had a guy in our user group - Tim Anderson I think his name was. He
scanned books like Code Complete. He said it didn't take long once you got
after it. He had a kid do it for
On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:37 AM, mrgmhale wrote:
> So, no, y'all aren't getting rid of me that easily! heh-heh...
Damn!!
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http
the first few weeks
... So, no, y'all aren't getting rid of me that easily! heh-heh...
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Weller
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 4:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
This one has been going the rounds for years! I first heard it in the days
of DOS, reputedly shouted from the audience during a demonstration of speech
controlled computers. Undoubtedly an urban myth.
Hope you are better soon and can continue with ProFox. I, for one, would
miss your very reason
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Anderson
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
>
> MB Software Solutions wrote:
> > Michael Madigan wrote:
> >
> >>
Excellent description. Thanks!
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Bernard
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
&
t; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
>
> Michael Madigan wrote
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
>
> All the automated phone systems use it, so someone's
> got to be doing something right.
>
>
ell
him.
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
>
> Vince Tea
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Speech-To-Text software opinions sought
>
>
> First, I'm sorry that you're having so much trouble and pain. Here's
> hoping for a quick and complete recovery.
>
> I can't comment on the Speech to Text programs
MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
>
>> All the automated phone systems use it, so someone's
>> got to be doing something right.
>>
>>
>>
> Good point. I've used some phone systems where the electronic operator
> was accurate about 90% of the time.
Companies are goin
OK, let me jump in here and see if I can help.
Voice recognition is getting more and more accurate by the day, but it is
important to realize that (1) it's still a very tough problem to solve and
(2) there are parallel efforts attacking the problem. The parallel tracks
are handling (1) an unlimit
Michael Madigan wrote:
> All the automated phone systems use it, so someone's
> got to be doing something right.
>
>
Good point. I've used some phone systems where the electronic operator
was accurate about 90% of the time.
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoft
All the automated phone systems use it, so someone's
got to be doing something right.
--- MB Software Solutions
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vince Teachout wrote:
> > Sorry to hear about your pain, I hope you recover
> fully, and quickly.
> >
> > I can't give you any actual usage based feedbac
Vince Teachout wrote:
> Sorry to hear about your pain, I hope you recover fully, and quickly.
>
> I can't give you any actual usage based feedback, but the last time I
> looked seriously into purchasing one of these programs (including
> Dragon), the feedback Google brought up was all negative.
Sorry to hear about your pain, I hope you recover fully, and quickly.
I can't give you any actual usage based feedback, but the last time I
looked seriously into purchasing one of these programs (including
Dragon), the feedback Google brought up was all negative. The consensus
was "it ain't th
First, I'm sorry that you're having so much trouble and pain. Here's
hoping for a quick and complete recovery.
I can't comment on the Speech to Text programs but I was just
researching the Dvorak keyboard. There is a right hand version that is
optimized for one handed typing. This might be wort
28 matches
Mail list logo
