Hello *,
here it is an idea of mine I've started to discuss with Sophie:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg06252.html
It's still in a very raw and theoretical form and it likely has to be
refined a lot.
The main purpose of such a proposal is to increase efficiency
Gianluca,
On 15/05/2011 13:27, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Hello *,
here it is an idea of mine I've started to discuss with Sophie:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg06252.html
It's still in a very raw and theoretical form and it likely has to be
refined a lot.
The mai
Sophie Gautier wrote:
So that could be a task for somebody who has recurrent time slots
available to [partly] manage the tasks planning. If the tool really
provide efficiency in time management, we should be able to avoid
harassing volunteers already overwhelmed.
Are we talking about "coordinat
Hi Gianluca,
On 16/05/2011 10:32, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
So that could be a task for somebody who has recurrent time slots
available to [partly] manage the tasks planning. If the tool really
provide efficiency in time management, we should be able to avoid
harassing volun
Sophie Gautier wrote:
Yes. I'm more for a wiki than a bugzilla, unless you know one that has a
very nice interface and is not frightening for non technical contributors.
Sincerely, I hate bugzilla. :)
For non technical people it's a real barrier for contribution, IMO.
However, summing up this
On 16/05/2011 15:54, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
Yes. I'm more for a wiki than a bugzilla, unless you know one that has a
very nice interface and is not frightening for non technical
contributors.
Sincerely, I hate bugzilla. :)
it's a good tool, but only a tool dedicated to
Hello there,
2011/5/16 Sophie Gautier
> On 16/05/2011 15:54, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
>
>> Sophie Gautier wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. I'm more for a wiki than a bugzilla, unless you know one that has a
>>> very nice interface and is not frightening for non technical
>>> contributors.
>>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
Sophie Gautier wrote:
I'm not sure you will have feedback before having done something, see
we're only two in the conversation for now. So lets implement a first
draft and a description of the process, we may get more feedback later.
OK, no problem.
So let's refine what we were discussing so
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
So, I find this to be a very good idea:-) What should be done, at this
stage? Write a proposal on the wiki? discuss it here? It obviously needs to
go somewhere:)
I've just sent a more detailed work flow idea in another message.
Please, have a look at it.
Regards,
G
On 17/05/2011 11:11, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
I'm not sure you will have feedback before having done something, see
we're only two in the conversation for now. So lets implement a first
draft and a description of the process, we may get more feedback later.
OK, no problem
Sophie Gautier wrote:
So let's refine what we were discussing so far. BTW, is there already
any official or unofficial draft document that can be used for proposal
like this, so that there is a homogeneous approval/rejection process for
project proposals?
No, I don't think so.
OK.
Just let
On 18/05/2011 10:04, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
So let's refine what we were discussing so far. BTW, is there already
any official or unofficial draft document that can be used for proposal
like this, so that there is a homogeneous approval/rejection process for
project propo
Sophie Gautier wrote:
A wiki is done to handle mistakes by design: you can always undo your
final action :)
If it's only the development of the tool, it should be placed under the
LibreOffice Wiki section I think:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki
Later, the tool itself,
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Any hint?
Autohint: wait, wait again and then it will work. ;-)
Now I can edit the wiki.
I hope to be able to put online a draft page (proposed tool, purposes,
work flow, and so on) within tomorrow.
If you or somebody else wants to start it before that date, please
Sophie Gautier wrote:
If it's only the development of the tool, it should be placed under the
LibreOffice Wiki section I think:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki
Later, the tool itself, if it must be visible when arriving on the wiki,
the Start page is the best to place
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
2) more info about the "formal" approval/rejection of the proposal. If
there is already a process, that's good. If there is not, we may create
it now.
I forgot writing that the process includes, for me, a longer open
discussion about the draft of the proposal. :)
Ciao
Hi Gianluca,
On 19/05/2011 12:42, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sophie Gautier wrote:
If it's only the development of the tool, it should be placed under the
LibreOffice Wiki section I think:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki
Later, the tool itself, if it must be visible when
Sorry if two copies of this message pass through, but it seems to me that
my first message was eaten from the mailing list bot. :)
Here is the orginal message:
In data 21 maggio 2011 alle ore 17:14:37, Sophie Gautier
ha scritto:
Hi Gianluca,
On 19/05/2011 12:42, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sop
Hi Gianluca,
On 21/05/2011 19:23, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Sorry if two copies of this message pass through, but it seems to me
that my first message was eaten from the mailing list bot. :)
Here is the orginal message:
In data 21 maggio 2011 alle ore 17:14:37, Sophie Gautier
ha scritto:
Hi Gi
In data 22 maggio 2011 alle ore 18:34:41, Sophie Gautier
ha scritto:
It's ok, I've understand, but for me there is no need of a formal
process, just a need of motivate people to participate.
OK, I've to start the recruiting campaign, then. :)
I'll start with the website ML and other local I
Hi Gianluca,
On 23/05/2011 09:31, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
In data 22 maggio 2011 alle ore 18:34:41, Sophie Gautier
ha scritto:
It's ok, I've understand, but for me there is no need of a formal
process, just a need of motivate people to participate.
OK, I've to start the recruiting campaign,
In data 23 maggio 2011 alle ore 09:40:44, Sophie Gautier
ha scritto:
Just a word on this, be careful that people will always come with his
best tool and will try to promote it, so you may end up with 10 people =
10 tools
Well, that's the price for a open discussion. ;)
However, what I'm
22 matches
Mail list logo
