Re: [PEDA] Giving DXP another try...

2004-08-03 Thread Hamid Wasti
Jim Monroe wrote: I sure wish someone could point out some PCB layout productivity enhancements that I might have missed. Bit it looks so pretty. Is that not enough for you? It has lots and lots of frills that should make you feel better and that should enhance your productivity. And

Re: [PEDA] Giving DXP another try...

2004-07-15 Thread Hamid Wasti
You are facing a learning curve when you move to DXP or to 2004 (the magnitude of the learning curve is in dispute, but everyone except Altium agrees that it is there). Why waste your time learning an orphaned product? You get 2004 for free if you bought or downgraded to DXP. If you have

Re: [PEDA] Recommendations please! -- DXP2004 - PADS - Expedition

2004-06-28 Thread Hamid Wasti
Protel Hell wrote: If your people are familiar with Protel and the staff is stable you might want to stick with Protel. Did you have a change of heart Protel Hell or do I need a new prescription for my glasses? Hamid * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To

Re: [PEDA] Recommendations please! -- DXP2004 - PADS - Expedition

2004-06-27 Thread Hamid Wasti
Tom Hausherr wrote: Tip - if you go directly to Mentor, they will not mention PADS, but will focus only on their Expedition tools. They will not even tell you that PADS exists. In order to get any information about PADS you must speak to a PADS reseller (who work outside the Mentor organization).

Re: [PEDA] Is Protel 99SE to 2004 upgrade a good idea yet?

2004-05-31 Thread Hamid Wasti
Jim Monroe wrote: I am amazed that more than 2 years after DXP's debut its still lacking in such a way. [Regarding global edits] Jim, I am amazed that you are amazed. Step back and see what kind of thinking went into making the change. Someone at a reasonably high level decided (or was

Re: [PEDA] Is Protel 99SE to 2004 upgrade a good idea yet?

2004-05-30 Thread Hamid Wasti
John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote: For things like this I have just used the list panel as I found it easier than FSO. In my favourites I keep some things like IsDesignator And HasFootprint('0603') IsDesignator And HasFootprint('0805') Then all I need do is edit selected columns and the change is

Re: [PEDA] TO-263 and TO-220 footprints?

2004-05-17 Thread Hamid Wasti
John A. Ross [Design] wrote: Personally I never liked to use footprints I have not optimised for the process they will go through, but that's me. Actually, let me put it a different way: Can you afford to use a footprint out of a library? If the footprint is incorrect, you can easily loose

Re: [PEDA] OT: Mentor PADS comparison

2004-05-17 Thread Hamid Wasti
Jeff Condit wrote: However, I need to keep some local and some global. This can be done with ports, but this use conflicts with some customers restriction of using ports for identifying busses only. What about upgrading your customers instead? A customer that thinks that having all nets global